Home > News > Thunder releases statement cutting ties with Nate Robinson

Thunder releases statement cutting ties with Nate Robinson

Via a press release from the Thunder:

β€œIn collaboration with Nate Robinson and his representatives, we have mutually agreed to continue working toward clarifying his future status with the Thunder. Nate is an accomplished player, but with the current composition of our roster, it will be unlikely he will have an opportunity to contribute on a nightly basis.

Given the compressed period of time that we have been given to work through the current situation, it has been decided that Nate will not attend training camp while we work with his representatives to resolve the situation. We will not be commenting on this subject further but will provide notification when a resolution is reached.”

Share:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • del.icio.us
  • Fark
  • StumbleUpon

News

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest
KennethLamb 5 pts

the thunder definitely could use his scoring talents especially off the bench….the dudes put up 40 off the bench multiple times in his career…hes raw…the first time doc rivers gave him extended minutes in a playoff game was the game when scored like 12 points in like 6 mins to send the celtics to the nba finals and turned the game into the blowout…no big deal…hes also scored 41 off the bench after sitting for 14 games straight in the doghosue, put the team on his back in the 4th quarter and OT….no seriously ive watched postgames with people saying nate rob literally had a jordan like performance, no one could stop him….but dont worry, lets just think hes this overrated dunk guy and hate for literally no reason….the dude is not even that incosistent when he got minutes in new york he was literally dirty averaging 17 a game…that year the knicks had 30 something wins and nate rob had a plus minus when he was on the court that was in the positive…the only one on the team and had the best plus minus by far….how can he see minutes of anysort behind ray allen and rondo, he could hit 5 shots and theyd still gotta put rondo back in cuz its rondo, but yet he was a major contributor in the playoffs…say what you want about his incosistency and at times poor decision making but its just microscoped cuz hes small…dude can go off hes by far the second most talented scorer on this team…and clutch as fuck….and if he could win boston a game actually 2 (one against the lakers, the shrek donkey game) i think he could have won us a game…but wait….eric maynor? is that a joke and cook and shefalashofa? ppl late hate get into the way of seeing basketball and recognizing talent….its unreal

OkcBaby 171 pts

KennethLamb You are a joke and in fantasy land. Good Luck on your next team. Following Nate.

DXL 30 pts

Buyout Robinson, cut Vaden, I think it's really important to get as far below the cap as possible to bid on amnesty candidates. Richard Jefferson or Chauncy Billups for $2 or $3 million per year? Sign us up.

finish1ine 9 pts

DXL we dont have many minutes for those guys.

DXL 30 pts

finish1ine Of course we do! RJ is better than Thabo and Billups is certainly better than Maynor. For low salaries those are no-brainer signings. Also just to keep them away from Miami and other capped-out contenders.

shiki 67 pts

Lopez+2 picks=Howard?I hope it is not true

anonymous12345 87 pts

shiki They also have to take on Hedo's contract I believe

diddoff 96 pts

shiki Playing the season opener against Howard-less Magic would be awesome!

supreethm92 14 pts

diddoffshiki It'll be a hell of a lot less fun to watch us smoke the Magic without Howard. It's not like they have enough talent even with Howard to beat us at home. It'll make it a lot more worthwhile for fans like me who want to see how festive the Thunder get on opening night after this miserable lockout if I get to watch a fun, competitive game

C_Dub 150 pts

shiki Forgot to throw in lottery tickets for the Magic, because that's what they'd be playing for if this trade goes down.

cemitten 13 pts

I guess I never understood the nate love by our fanbase. He didn't contribute anything other than jumping around on the sideline. If you want a fan look at any of the 13000 people sitting around the court...

JimboSlice 198 pts

cemitten I think what the love is, at least for me, is this guy was no "bench bum" like most guys who are in his situation (*cough cough* Byron Mullens *cough cough*). The guy was a productive player, who was playing relatively big roles, who got abruptly traded to a team where he didn't play at all, and he took it right in stride. You have to appreciate that at least a little bit, even if his sideline antics don't do anything more for you.

Keith00 42 pts

JimboSlicecemitten Actually, he was a bench bum. Couldn't shoot, couldn't defend, and didn't pass. I think everyone wants to remember Nate as the guy who dropped 30 one night for the Celtics, but he's not. He's a chucker with no defensive or PG skills. He's Byron Mullens with a useless highlight reel, not anything close to a productive player.

JimboSlice 198 pts

Keith00cemitten I wouldn't say all that. If you look at his advanced stats and stats per 36 min for boston in 09-10, especially the playoffs, he was one of their more productive players outside the Big 3. And going back before that, he averaged 17.2 points a game with a 2:1 assist to turnover ratio in 08-09 with the Knicks. From the eye test for us, yes, he was a bench bum, but his career production tends to show otherwise.

Keith00 42 pts

JimboSlicecemitten He was a bum for us, which is the only thing that matters. And even career, he has below average efficiency, terrible defense, and the eye test shows him obviously thinking himself better than he is (way too high usage whenever he is on the court). I'm in the same boat as cemitten, I just don't see why people liked him so much. It's one thing to support him because he's on the team, it's another to give him props for things he doesn't do.

f5alcon 273 pts

Keith00JimboSlicecemitten if you look at his best season for the knicks he had 17.2ppg 4.1apg 3.9 rpg on 29mpg with 13.9 fga/g with a ts% of 55%

I do not see how somebody with 14 fga/g in their highest fga season is a chucker.If he is then so is westbrook as westbrook had more fga/g and a lower ts%.

JimboSlice 198 pts

Keith00cemitten but he was a "bum" for us because of the situation he came into. As f5alcon pointed out, his numbers don't say chucker at all. That's just the perception since he played a total of 30 minutes in a Thunder jersey, and still even in that period averaged 1.5 assists to 0.5 turns. Not only that, but his per 36 minute averages were STILL strong even in the terrible role he played ( 4th on the team in scoring, 7.2 assists to 2.4 turns- of note Maynor was only 7.1 to 2.3 per 36 best on the team).

My point is, this is a completely legitemate player who deserved minutes and could have easily whined and made a huge stink about the way he was used here, but showed OKC nothing but love and appreciation despite his tough situation. If anything, he deserves far more love than any of the other benchwarmers we've cheered on.

ThunderChick2010 207 pts

cemitten I'm thinking you're not a native Oklahoman. We embrace everyone like they're family and love 'em up while they're here. After all, everyone is temporary on the team to some degree. (BTW. . . there are 18,203 of us sitting around the court!) :)

cemitten 13 pts

ThunderChick2010 Unless you're on the OU football team and lose... Sorry, had to throw that in. Lived here all my life and understand Oklahoman's tendency. The difference is players like Ivey, Livingston, and the multitude of other short term bench guys on this team never got the same love as Nate has. I have nothing against Nate. Wish he could have been product here and wish him the best wherever he lands. It's just interesting that everybody developed such a love for a bench player who really did nothing for us on the court.

supreethm92 14 pts

cemittenThunderChick2010 Nate got so much love because he's high energy. Even if he wasn't contributing on the court he was showing a ton of love to the OKC crowd and to every player on the team. Everybody loves having a guy like that on their team. He's rowdy and crazy and super likeable because he's the diminutive point guard who happens to be a 3-time Dunk Content Champion. He has a reputation of being a lot of fun and a total goof ball. I loved having him in OKC even if he isn't gonna be here any more.

TaoMaas 58 pts

cemitten Nate contributed to the Thunder before even arriving. When Kendrick Perkins was upset about being traded, Nate helped assure him by letting him know that he'd be there with him. Kendrick could have been totally pissed off when he arrived...or open to something new. I think Nate helped open the door to the Thunder.

Grolgar 142 pts

How come we only have 13,000 at the game? Are we playing Centenary?

anonymous12345 87 pts

I fully expect Darnell to still wish for Nate to be put in during the 3rd quarter in his game recaps

diddoff 96 pts

Can anyone explain me Tony Allen's tweet:

RT @aa000G9: @okcthunder @NBA #ThunderTrainingCamp”

DizzDai 21 pts

diddoff@nba Sounds like the rumor is we traded Thabo for Tony Allen.

cemitten 13 pts

DizzDaididdoff@nba Please be serious about this.....

Old Man Game 192 pts

cemittenDizzDaididdoff Holy shit that would be awesome.

DizzDai 21 pts

I haven't seen anything serious. Just a few random tweets. I think it is likely just a rumor.

anonymous12345 87 pts

DizzDaididdoff I see no reason for the Grizz to do this trade. It doesn't save them any money

JimboSlice 198 pts

DizzDaididdoff@nba I would crap myself and do an irish jig if this were true

fearthebeard 6 pts

diddoff@nba please be true. please be true.

fearthebeard 6 pts

diddoff i asked Tony via Twitter if he was coming to OKC, to which he replied "Naw". too good to be true i guess.

diddoff 96 pts

fearthebeard Nevermind. Thinking about it for some hours was great.

JimboSlice 198 pts

fearthebearddiddoff dangit. researching this rumor this morning made me late for work. and for nothing!

C_Dub 150 pts

diddoff@nba Can we PLEASE get Tony Allen. One of the few non Thunder players I follow on Twitter, and he's one of the guys that would exponentially help KD by not being in his way lol.

btw, sad day in a way...Brandon Roy retiring due to bad knees. From 2006 to 2009 he was a superstar in the making and then like that, he's done. Pretty bad deal for PDX. As if they didn't have enough injuries destroying their franchise, just goes to show how lucky we've been.

DizzDai 21 pts

Any news on a Westbrook extension. It should be done by now, right? Making me nervous.

JimboSlice 198 pts

DizzDai Don't think they could officially break news of signings til about 8 minutes ago. Don't worry, we should hear something very soon.

bigturd 6 pts

In light of the amnesty, hopefully Presti will bid $1 on Chauncey then ship him out with rights to Yotem Halparen / Peter Fehse(?) for a late first rounder. There's definitely some amnesty opportunities with being just slightly under the cap as a competitive team alongside most teams under the cap that are rebuilding and have no interest in bidding on vets.

bigturd 6 pts

The big question is the stretch provision and what we could do with it. Works well with vets, but really the only vet I see as a part of the future is Nick and his contract on the books is already diluted enough that the 40% doesnt really make much of a cap difference.

On another note: Have to feel good about all this western conference chaos with the thunder roster essentially intact. Aside from all the damage the league may take that is...

GeoLogger 29 pts

Darnell Mayberry posted : The Thunder could hold onto its one-time amnesty option to use on a larger deal later so long as it was signed prior to July 1, 2011.

I don't know who we signed prior to July 1, 2011 that we would ever use the amnesty on.

KD35Russ0 6 pts

GeoLogger Potentially could save it for someone we trade for...maybe in the case we make a bad trade (not likely)...or in the case we make a trade where we have to take a bad contract back and then could just amnesty that bad contract.

GeoLogger 29 pts

KD35Russ0 So what is the bit about signed before July 1 2011 about? I hadn't noticed that before

bigturd 6 pts

GeoLoggerKD35Russ0 Doesn't count on a trade. Has to be an existing contract signed prior to that time by the team that signed it. Essentially it is worth protection on the Perkins deal and that's it. Which with his injury history and games logged could end up being a little something, but likely not used.

f5alcon 273 pts

it could be used on perkins to give us the room to resign ibaka nd harden if somebody tries to max them both.

KD35Russ0 6 pts

bigturdGeoLogger Didn't know that it couldn't be used on a traded player. Thought it was just for any deal prior to this CBA. Interesting, thanks

justin_mia 410 pts

I think he is useful depth, or injury insurance. I hope he agrees to a buyout, wouldn't want to just waive him for nothing.

Thunderstruck_24 6 pts

Sad, but necessary. Will miss seeing you on the bench Nate!