Home > Commentary > For the players, it’s become an emotional issue

For the players, it’s become an emotional issue

Patrick McDermott/NBAE/Getty Images

When Billy Hunter, Derek Fisher and 60 some-odd players stood behind a podium Monday afternoon after a players’ meeting, most expected them to announce they’d be putting the league’s proposal to a vote. Or at least, announce they’re making a counter.

But that didn’t happen. Instead, it was doomsday.

I think you, probably like me, were left wondering one thing: Why? What are the players thinking? The chances of them actually winning a lawsuit are slim. The chances of them recouping their losses in a new collective bargaining agreement are probably even slimmer. And yet instead of pushing forward and trying to push the pressure back on the league and owners to accept their revised deal, they decided to blow it up. They didn’t even try and mask it. During their press conference they even said that. They wanted to completely detonate the current negotiations.

Again: Why?

Because players are emotional. This isn’t a negotiation anymore. It’s a fight. The owners have always tried to approach this as a business deal and the players met them on that — until now. Consider this quote from Kevin Durant over the weekend:

“I know we get paid handsomely but we deserve to fight for something that’s right,” he told HoopsWorld. “We feel that they’re trying to strong-arm us and back us into a corner just to accept the deal. Of course they’re going to bluff and show the fans, try to put the fans against us like they’re the good guys and we’re the bad guys.

“I think getting what you deserve and fighting for something you believe is right is something all the players really care about,” he continued.  “Of course we enjoy the fans, we like the fans that come and support us.  They’re the reason why we’re playing this game, the reason why we continue to play this game but at some point you have to fight for what’s right and we can’t get bullied.”

That, says it all. In a game setting, if Nene throws a shoulder into Kendrick Perkins, Perkins is not only going to shove him back, but Durant and the rest of the team is going to back up their teammate. It’s just their nature. That’s what’s happening here. David Stern just gave Derek Fisher an elbow. And here come his teammates.

Billy Hunter said on a podcast that this has become a “moral” issue for the players. At the time, it just seemed like talk to try and scare the league. But clearly it’s not. This is an emotional thing. And players are extremely emotional. They live off it. It’s what drives them. They’re competitive, emotional and passionate. Prideful.

So why would we expect anything less from them now, especially after they were backed into a corner by David Stern’s ultimatum? The players wanted to stand and fight instead of just taking their medicine from the rich guys running the league.

I think Jerry Stackhouse said it well while ripping Derek Fisher. “Players are emotional. Players get emotional,” he said. “So no, I don’t necessarily, particularly want Derek Fisher or any of the executive committee negotiating a contract for me.”

I mean, Hunter actually called the hard salary cap a “blood issue,” meaning, I guess, that the players would rather die than give in to that. That’s what the owners are negotiating against. It’s nothing really all that new to them as they’ve haggled over contracts and extensions with players for years, but now the players are collectively fighting. At least that’s the appearance.

I understand taking a stand for what you think is right. A tip of the cap to that. But this isn’t a fight against poverty or injustice to children or something. This is about business. A $4 billion one, in fact. One in which the employees are paid more than $5 million per year annually on average.

At some point, the players are going to have to approach it that way. I’m all for doing what you think is right. If the players were being greedy, they would’ve just accepted this deal, cashed their paychecks and forgot all about it. But instead, they’re sacrificing for future generations of players. They’re taking a hit not for themselves necessarily, but to one, set a new precedent that says the players won’t be bullied and two, give the future players of the NBA a decent system to play in.

But this is a business decision. And sometimes, looking it as a moral dilemma isn’t what’s wise. Because in the end, players typically end up getting screwed in these situations. It’s a bad idea to operate in this atmosphere running on emotion. You have to always keep your head and make sure every move makes sense not just in terms of saving face, but also actual dollars and cents. You can’t let pride interrupt what’s wise. That’s a challenge every busisnessperson has to face on a daily basis.

This court battle is exactly what David Stern called it: It’s a tactic. Nothing more. The players want a deal. The owners want a deal. Nobody wants to go to court and actually sue for damages. That’s not the plan here, though if both sides remain stubborn, it will be. What both sides want is to get back to playing basketball. It’s just all about playing cards right now and throwing out bets that hopefully force the other side to give a little. They very well may have pushed all-in there and could lose every chip they have, but they’re not going to fold. They’re going to go down in a blaze.

Why didn’t the players just take the deal and move on? It’s the best deal they’ll probably get and despite it not being fair one bit, it might not matter. The reason is because that’s not how they’re bred. That’s not what’s in them. They aren’t just going to give up. You back a professional athlete into a corner and tell him he has to lose and he’s going to fight back. It’s like Walter White in Breaking Bad. The players are trying to tell the league, “I am the one who knocks.” It’s all about grabbing the upper hand.

Don’t wonder why the players didn’t just take the NBA’s offer. Because the reason should be obvious. It’s just not what they do.

Share:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • del.icio.us
  • Fark
  • StumbleUpon

Commentary

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest
Jax Raging Bile Duct 135 pts

When you take the business ramifications of this tactic out of the equation, I like what the players have done. Compare what the players got in 1999 with what they were about to get in 2011, and it's hard not to feel like you're getting screwed. It's like the owners are 'the man', or 'the machine' if you prefer. Heck, in this micro-situation, the players are the 99% and the owners are the 1%. It's in my nature to resent 'the man' and to rage against 'the machine', so I totally get where the players are coming from.

And I dont' mind the attitude that says "So you're going to make me bleed, huh? Alright. I get it. Fine. Let's do that. But when we're done, and I'm bleeding, you aren't going to look so good yourself; and the next time we go toe to toe you'll remember that I wasn't a pushover and you'll think twice about starting something."

The fans are just the casualties of war, but you can't avoid the war for the sake of the casualties. If you do that then the owners get what they want without a fight, and if they can get what they want without a fight, then what will they try to take next time? Give them an inch and they'll take a mile.

But sure, factor in the business ramifications and this is a Pyrrhic victory best case for the players, but more likely just an out and out loss. I guess all I'm saying is that aside from that, I can totally relate to how the players are approaching this.

So like, down with the man and stuff.

Daniel Hawaii 208 pts

Nice article Royce. I agree with pretty much everything. Very well written.

JimboSlice 198 pts

The number one rule in any combat, battle, debate, or competition is to control your emotions and not make decisions based on them. The players definitely broke that rule. Had they offered a counter for the owners to vote on, we may have not only seen a season, but we would have seen one in which the system issues were at least somewhat fair to the players. Instead, we get this. I'm extremely disappointed that the same players who have so masterfully harnessed their emotions and focused them into becoming amazing athletes, have now lost control of them and in essence, lost the game.

Old Man Game 192 pts

The chances of the players lawsuits succeeding are slight but only because this is likely to settle well before that. The Owners will string out the litigation with procedural maneuvers and basically wait them out. But by the letter of the law the players chances of winning are actually very good. Look at it this way, their attorney David Boies is one of the 4 or 5 most highly regarded attorneys in the entire country. This isn't some small town lawyer or ambulance chaser just blowing smoke. The Owners are engaged in price fixing and a group boycott that is plainly barred by antitrust laws. You think the Owners want to risk setting a legal precedent that could end up eliminating the salary cap forever? How would Sacto, and Milwaukee and for that matter OKC like to bid for talent in an unrestrained market? This litigation could end the NBA as we know it and that's why I guarantee you the Owners are taking this very seriously.

ThunderChick2010 207 pts

thecommenterformerlyknownasThomas It will be interesting to see what comes out of the owners talking tomorrow to discuss their strategy/response. I'm keeping my fingers crossed that someone with a basketball heart will push to reopen negotiations even if it is through the lawyers.

f5alcon 273 pts

i do not think i would classify the players chances that high, it did not work for the nflpa, the court affirmed lockouts are legal there, and that precedent will almost certainly be used to rule against the players here. The fact that the owners want 53/47 but offered 50/50 is probably going to be enough to show that they tried to work with players. Also disbanding the union as a legal tactic is frowned on and works against the players. It really is a longshot for the players to win.

f5alcon 273 pts

when this is all over the players are going to wish they accepted a 50/50 deal, i fear for them it will be 55/45 or 60/40 in the owners favor by the end.

ThunderChick2010 207 pts

We watch the players precisely because they ARE so passionate. On the court, that's great; in business dealings, not so much. It's become an emotional issue for us fans too. . . .

Clark Matthews 8 pts

I usually have something to add, but you said it all. Nice work, Royce.

Royce Young 72 pts moderator

Clark Matthews Well now that's saying something right there...

diddoff 96 pts

I'm sure Rondo won't have any problems during the lockout. The Winslows will help him out.