Home > Bolts > Friday Bolts – 10.7.11

Friday Bolts – 10.7.11

Interesting point from Henry Abbott of TrueHoop: “Lost in the shuffle of 50/50 revenue talk: League offered players the right to get out of a deal after seven years. I’m told both sides would have the right to opt out at that point. If we assume that in seven years the league will have incredible national TV deals and a swelling global audience, that’s a big concession. The union has been adamantly against players missing out on what could be fat revenue years, just as the league has been looking forward to that exact thing.”

Via NewsOK, OKC moved up in Sporting News’ top sports cities: “But Oklahoma City’s stock as a sports city continues to rise. OKC has climbed to No. 26, up six spots from last year, in the latest Sporting News Best Sports Cities rankings. The rankings define Oklahoma City as the OKC metro area, which includes Norman. Stillwater ranks 64th, up five spots from last year. Tulsa ranks 84th, up from 108th last year.”

Sam Amick of SI.com: “Two sources who have been briefed on the situation said that while no meetings are scheduled, the two sides are likely to resume talks in some form on Sunday and Monday and make one last push to get a deal done before the deadline. It remains to be seen whether Stern’s 50-50 offer is still there for the taking, or whether the players who earned 57 percent of BRI in the old deal are prepared to ignore the advice of the aforementioned agents by going below the 52 percent mark.”

This Hank Williams debate featuring Bomani Jones was fairly insane.

If you missed it, here’s Blake Griffin naked.

Ethan Sherwood Strauss wonders if anyone REALLY cares about the arena workers: “When you rip squabbling players/owners for slightly lessening SMG profits, you hurtle down a slope more slippery than K2 + WD40. By this logic, I’m hurting families by not buying up various fried foods whenever I walk into Oracle. Extending this logic, any striking employee or locking employer should be castigated, based solely on the negative Butterfly Effect consequences of a work stoppage. As in, autoworkers should never strike because they might deprive order takers at fast food drive-thru windows.”

A pretty great point from agent Keith Glass: “We’re in tough economic times, isn’t that the owners’ argument?” Glass says. “Okay, so where is the rollback for the fans? Where is the rollback for ticket prices, hot dogs, beer and parking? Where is the union and where is the league on this? Shouldn’t they be worried about the people that actually pay the freight? But fans are in the middle of this, too. If you keep bitching about this I don’t want to see you in February paying $140 for a ticket. It is across-the-board insanity.”

Adam Morrison got ejected for getting in a shoving match in Russia, or wherever he’s playing. I only link to this because the video’s amazing.

Share:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • del.icio.us
  • Fark
  • StumbleUpon

Bolts

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest

The author of the article would probably count himself as the exception, one of the obsessed. Most Chinese probably haven't allowed themselves to become obsessed with this western activity, yet. But a lot of their young will probably still follow Kobe and a few others some, perhaps Durant.

@ Crow

The tone of that article came across rather funny to me. Basically it said "Yeah, we Chinese don't care so much about the NBA anymore, so please start the season NOW DAMMIT, PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE!

Ozarkhick, Did you see this story?

http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?oe=ut...

If you looked for it in the regular way you wouldn't find it. http://sheridanhoops.com/2011/10/05/weijia-column-...

It strangely disappeared. Could be for several reasons but I'm guessing someone leaned on the author and / or the site. Main guess? Initials D.S.

To be clear: The league wants to get that TV deal before it has to renegotiate a new CBA ("the next one, after this one").

Emcee_Matt, I think you are on the right track that the revenue split won't be a simple number for the whole deal. Both sides introduced the idea of a range with a floor and a max within a season. The final deal might have both a range within a season and that range might slide up or down across the seasons. Another blogger suggested it slide based on actual owner profitability. I think that in particular and sliding in general might be good if they agree on the criteria. A simple number will be too easy to cast as one side winning and one losing now. A complicated system will have pluses and minuses for the sides and it will be harder to say it is a loss or "crave" by one side so I think that will be the way they strike a deal that they can actually sell to both sets of clients.

The new TV deal "if" as lucrative as expected would change the revenue / other administrative expense ratio (everything but player salary) and it could make it easier for the owners to be profitable and profitable at a higher player % of BRI than now. The league wants to get that TV deal before it has to renegotiate a new CBA. If I was working for the players I wouldn't do that for more than 1 year and I wouldn't do it even for a year unless the owners made it worthwhile in other parts of the deal.

Question for the Chinese fans - which would you say has the larger fan base in China, European Association Football, or the NBA?

Also, would you say there is a difference between the Football(Soccer) fans and the NBA fans in terms of age, education, income, etc?

I've just been thinking about the future revenue outlook as it relates the the lockout, and how the Chinese market might effect it.

Okay... Let me ask this and see what people think. If I am wrong, I really want to know what I am missing.

My Proposed deal: Sign a 10-year CBA with a 7th-year opt out for both parties. Start the deal at 50-50 (which allows the owners to recoup their supposed "losses" from the past few seasons) and then over the course of this 10-year CBA the players will eventually make their way back up to 53% (Allowing them to be in a bargaining posistion for the next CBA dealings in 2021.) Also, guarantee the players that if they take a 50-50 split RIGHT NOW, that they are entitled to an extra 3% of the TV revenue when it comes in 4 years... which in all would mean that they owners don't lose anymore money, by the time they would even start to be on the negative side of a 53-47 split they would recoup with TV deals...

am I missing anything in this?? or is this just total crap?

Well also the "tough times" talking point is demonstrably bull shit by virtue of the attendence and ratings numbers. Both of which have been great the last several years.

The "tough economic times" issue is still trumped by the "supply and demand" issue.

If someone, or several someones, give up their tickets because the tough economic times have changed their ability to afford them, someone else will be there to buy them up again.

Tough economic times only changes the lifestyle of the middle class, and it only hurts the lower class. Very few in the lower class have expendable income to buy tickets anyway, but the ones they do buy are also the tickets that are the easiest to sell.

It's pretty clear they don't do drug testing in the Serbian league. Adam Morrison has suddenly switched from doughy diabetic to professional wrestler physique. And he flies into sudden fits of rage.

Morrison plays in Serbia for Red Star. This game was against "my team" Bayern Munich ;-)

That's a great point. If the argument is times are tough the players need to take less, shouldn't the conclusion of that be, "so we can lower ticket prices and stimulate demand for more ticket sales." Of course we don't hear that.