Home > Commentary > Lockout optimism turns to doom and gloom

Lockout optimism turns to doom and gloom

Those past six days were fun. After months of darkness and doom and gloom rhetoric from both players and owners, there was finally a little reason for optimism. And it wasn’t just in the form of Roger Mason’s non-tweet. Pretty much everywhere you looked, there was reason to believe an NBA season could be starting on time.

The turn of the calendar to September ramped up the pressure to get a deal done. Backs are to the wall in terms of getting training camps and preseason in. Whether it was just unbridled optimism from the media or there was good reason for it, the buildup to Tuesday’s labor meeting in New York had people believing in something good. We all waited for reps to emerge and proudly proclaim, “Looking like a season! HOW U!!!”

Alas, that didn’t happen. In fact, quite the opposite. David Stern put it this way: “We did not have a great day.” Ken Berger of CBSSports.com has been all over the labor negotiations and he passed along some pretty unsettling news. A sampling:



A bombshell indeed. One that just obliterated my upbeat outlook of the 2011-12 season. So much for hacked tweets and Derek Fisher texting players to get ready for a season. So much for no more doom and gloom or pessimistic rhetoric. So much for November and December basketball, potentially.

Now of course, this is one side of the story. The league has a different view of it all, but the players aren’t shy about being downtrodden about the chances of a deal. But I wouldn’t expect a different story from the league, except they’re just going to flip the script and put it on the players. They may have bigger problems though. Consider this:


Division of interest, eh? The story from the league has always been that the owners are more unified than ever and while you have to consider the source — Billy Hunter isn’t exactly on the owners side here — it makes sense for some of the owners to dislike this incredibly stubborn, hardline stance. For example, an owner like Clay Bennett is captaining a successful small market team that has a fanbase absolutely nuts for its team.

And if you start punching those fans in the face, you don’t know what the consequences could be. I’m speculating, but I would assume someone like Bennett is saying, “OK guys, I rode with you to here, but we need to get something done.” Then the big hitters like James Dolan and Mark Cuban come in and shoot it all down. At least that’s how I’m picturing it.

Don’t give up completely. There’s naturally going to be some tough negotiating to be done. The two sides were miles apart when they started and the calendar saying September isn’t going to just automatically close that gap. It’s called bargaining. Negotiating. It’s all part of it. Here I go trying to talk myself into it again, but there’s still time to get something done. But future sessions will have to be much more productive than this. Otherwise, this sums it up all too well:

I remember a wise (fictional) person say one time, “The night is darkest just before the dawn.” Boy I hope so. Because it’s pretty dark out right now.

Share:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • del.icio.us
  • Fark
  • StumbleUpon

Commentary

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest

I blame David Khan and Darko Milicic

You guys are in a cavalier mood today.

If we lose an entire season, what's the big deal? They'll get a new CBA that's good for about 10 years or so. You all act like watching basketball cures cancer or something. When it's on, watch it. When it isn't, watch breaking bad.

And if you boycott the product, that's fine. But there will be another fan right there to pick up where you left off.

Hockey didn't take a hit of any significance in the areas of the world that appreciate the sport. The NBA will still have marketable stars and the best basketball product in the world to offer even if they lose an entire season - which they won't. They'll lose a few games and we'll be playing ball by Christmas. But even if they did, I don't see America being so idealistic that it boycotts the league into any kind of remorse.

I don't care if it's 56 or 62 games this year, I just want a season....any kind of feasible season.

C_Dub :Yeah and the NHL is dead in most people’s eyes because of it. Nobody even wants to televise their games anymore and I can’t believe the NBA wants to go down the same road.

That may be the perception, but it isn't reality. NHL owners are the happiest they've ever been and by their own admission are better off financially after losing an entire season to get the deal they wanted. The only markets that have forgot about hockey are the ones that couldn't support it to begin with. Certainly the TV deals aren't what they were, but they are coming back and unfortunately I think the NBA owners are looking at the NHL as more of a model rather than the cautionary tale we're making it out to be.

This article pisses me off. It also has allowed me the opportunity to think about my feelings of the NBA, and I've come to this conclusion:
IF the NBA does not start this season on time and it ends up effecting the hard working people who work to make the NBA experience enjoyable for those of us who attend the games, then I will chose to boycott the remainder of the season even if the NBA chooses to play half a season. If they want to play with people's lively-hoods and keep their game to themselves, then they can keep it. I love watching and cheering my Thunder, but the Thunder is guilty by association with this lock out. If the league and the players are willing to hurt the fans that make this whole thing possible, then why should we reward them by returning to games when the lock out is over? So, this is my stance: If they want to lock out the season, go for it. If you think Im coming back for half a season, forget it. I know I am just one fan, one die hard fan at that, but this is messed up.
I wish there were many others who would stand by me in boycotting the product if this company and its employees are willing to allow thousands of hard working people to be out of work, and effecting the very communities that support these organizations.

they might get their 30% reduction in costs if they lockout a full year but they migh tlose even more in revenue as fans go away.

If anything, wouldn't the Dolans and the Cubans be the ones to give itn first? As the owners of big money teams, the current system suits them well. I would think it would be the Heisleys, the Kohls, and the Leonsises that would be opposing Bennett.

Anyways the point is that this royally sucks.

Yeah and the NHL is dead in most people's eyes because of it. Nobody even wants to televise their games anymore and I can't believe the NBA wants to go down the same road.

Boooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

I don't expect to see any major movement until games are missed. But I felt this way all along, so I guess this news isn't disappointing because it isn't a surprise to me.

I like how Adrian Wojnarowski put it...

@WojYahooNBA
No one could truly believe the NBA would back away from harsh changes before the players started missing checks, before pain was doled out.

Union and agents always knew NBA was going distance for hard cap. They want this to look like NHL. And hockey lost a full season getting it.

lol.............the NBA going to keep itself locked out as more and more fans continue to flock to the NFL, who wrapped up their lockout in a timely fashion and are now playing games.

I NEEEEEEED more Thunder basketball, the owners should get off their high horses and pony up.