Home > Commentary > Wing options aplenty for the Thunder, if they want one

Wing options aplenty for the Thunder, if they want one

Brian Babeneau/NBAE/Getty Images

Prior to the draft, it was pretty much agreed upon that if the Thunder needed anything, it would probably be a capable wing to spell Kevin Durant when needed. Preferably a player with some defensive chops and the ability to drill an open shot.

Why? Mainly because with the high probability of James Harden moving into the starting five, the bench loses a little bit of firepower. Reggie Jackson certainly might alleviate some of that as a combo scoring guard, and Thabo can slide over to a natural backup of Durant, which might be better suited for him (10-15 minutes a game for Thabo makes a lot more sense than 25-30).

That’s the probable scenario and truly, the Thunder standard operating procedure. Don’t overextend on a veteran that may or may not help. Instead, bring in a talented but raw player, put him in the program and watch him grow into the piece you need. That’s the idea with Jackson and with his ability, I’m confident he could become a bit of a Russell Lite off the bench and help replace Harden’s scoring punch.

Still, it’s likely there will be a roster spot available (Oklahoma City’s full at 15 right now, but Royal Ivey isn’t guaranteed and there hasn’t been a resolution on Daequan Cook yet) and the Thunder will have some cap space — I think. (You know, that whole CBA thing could affect that.) If Cook stays with the team there might not be a lot of cash to spend, but there will be some at least, if Presti is willing.

I really don’t think the Thunder are all that interested in adding a wing, especially since they passed over Jordan Hamilton in the draft, who seemed like a fit there. Really, Sam Presti is probably fine with kind using Thabo and Cook — again, assuming he’s back — as Durant’s makeshift backup.

But, if Presti were interested in adding a little wing help that could score and shoot in stretches, there are options. Zach Lowe of SI.com put together his top 20 free agent wings yesterday and picking through his list, I found five guys kind of interesting. (By no means is this an endorsement of these guys, just something to talk/think about.)

Shane Battier

Well, I guess I’ve already sort of covered this, but to summarize once again: Battier is a terrific teammate, a quality defender, an OK shooter and by having him on the team, he can’t defend Kevin Durant anywhere except for practice, which is probably a good thing in the long run.

Mike Dunleavy

Never really thought of him as a fit, but really, it’s not a horrible thought. His last contract had him making $10.5 million in his last season (can you see why owners were losing money now?), but there’s no way he’s going to make near that much this time around. He’s a really good shooter, moves well off the ball, scores all over the floor and while not a great defender, he certainly tries.

I think he’s going to be hunting for more than the Thunder want to pay, but he’s going to take a paycut and to play on a contender like OKC, he might be willing. His issue could be minutes, but he’s versatile and can play both the 2 and the 3. I see him as a potential fit, honestly.

DeShawn Stevenson

In terms of the so-called Thunder “culture” he couldn’t be more of a non-fit. But he plays defense and shoots the 3. He’s basically just a little more qualified Thabo in some ways. Not really a great fit, but he could be really affordable.

Anthony Parker

He’s sort of the token veteran wing player. He’s always decent, never bad and handles his job well. He’s old at 36, but still performed relatively well in Cleveland last year. He can hit an open 3 and while his defense isn’t as good as it used to be, he’s still a hard worker. I don’t think he provides anything all that different or better than Thabo though.

Tracy McGrady

Yep, seriously. In all reality, McGrady could be a really interesting fit behind KD. He showed in Detroit that not only was he willing to accept a bench role, but he also showcased the ability to run point, play off the ball and even defend (according to Synergy, his one-on-one defensive numbers were surprisingly good).

He’s never been out of the first round of the playoffs and at 32, his window of opportunity is closing. A young team like the Thunder could energize him and give him a decent shot at a little glory. Plus, he’d be cheap. He made just $1.3 million last season in Detroit and would only require a similar number again.

The more I think about it, McGrady seems like a really interesting idea. You run a slight risk of him remember how good he used to be and trying to overstep his role, because he’d be playing an extremely minor one with the Thunder, but in having a versatile wing player that can score and shoot, McGrady works well. And the price will certainly be right.

Share:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • del.icio.us
  • Fark
  • StumbleUpon

Commentary

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest

J-Rich: “I’ve been blessed by God to play in the NBA for a lot of money. I’d like to go someplace that has a chance to win a championship.”

T-mac would be really good for us if e was willing to accept harden's role from last year off the bench. I would support picking him up if presti got a chance to meet with him 1-on-1 to make sure he was in it for the right reasons. Plus, how can anyone not want a chance to see something like this in thunder blue?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ceLlz7dOOvY&fea...

McGrady, while an amazing Talent, has no place on this team. I think hes a bit of a head case and cannot forsee him embracing the role as a fifth option.

Battier's aging and a slight step up from Thabo.

No on on this list appeals to me

If you think T-mac has gotten fat now, wait till he shows up after the lockout

@ Michael
Last season Carter had 3.1 asts in 30mins.This year is 2 in 27 mins.But he changed team and played with Nash.He is always a SG and has 4.2 Asts in his career.It is decent for a SG.

T-mac played for a very chaos team.Stuckey is not a good PG.So they need T-mac to play PG to run their offense.T-mac has 4.7 asts in career,a little better than Carter.

And we have Maynor,so I think “creates opportunities for himself” is more important than "for others".Carter is better than T-mac as a scorer now.

But Carter never shows he can play well as a role player,and he must want more than T-mac

I dont see Cook as a KD replacement and only Thabo when we are desperate

Cook spread the floor for the starters because the lacked at that. Not so much now that Harden will start.

I think Cooks place on the team is as a specialist with the 1st team, not so much a rotation replacement for KD. Brooks utilized him really well, bringing him in for 2-5 minutes with westbrook and kd on the floor in some manner and finding him for a wide open three.

Even if you dont think RJ would play. We still have Cook and Thabo. KD replacement is more detrimental to the team. Heaven forbid injury.

What about bringing up lat will from tulsa? though he doesnt have much offense, he rebounds well.

@ Bryson
lol your right that was terrible.

@ okc baby
I didn't mean in terms of position, more in what they bring to the floor. I don't think RJ, despite his clear talent and highlight reel will be ready to replace what Harden did off the bench. I'd prefer to see at least for this year, 5.Maynor 4/3. T-Mac. 3.4. Thabo. T-Mac is capable of playing all three positions with his handles and passing/vision.

Saying all this i doubt the thunder will bother getting any free agents :)

^

That was a joke...I don't really know why I said it, very bad joke.

Reggie Jackson is awful. Just gonna put that out there right now. I do not want him on our team.

Cook, Thabo, RJ could play the 2. Id rather look for a backup 3

Michael :I think what we really need isn’t a replacement for KD, its a replacement for Harden. Thabo can fill the hole of kd’s 8min he’s off, but what our team will really be missing (unless r. jackson can bring it in his 1st year) is a guy coming of the bench who can create plays and scoring opportunities for himself and others. I think in this case T-Mac is the best fit player wise, and although it’s still a slight gamble, if you let him take ownership and responsibility for the 2nd unit i think the ego he has left will be satisfied.

T mac plays a total different position:)

@ shiki
fits well in the "creates opportunities for himself" way, not so much the creates for the "and others" way Beardalicious does. That's where i like T-Mac 3.5 assists in 23 min a game isn't bad. Especially compared to VC's 1.6 in 27 min

Might sound stupid but i would gladly give up thabo, cook, and regg if it meant getting T-Mac and letting his ego be satisfied by being the bench leader, okay maybe not regg but the other two. Sign Stevenson. Like an earlier poster said, i also have never heard a bad comment about D Steve, and it shows alot that he aloud the likes of Jason Terry of all people to eat his minutes. Vince, Sam Presti, and the Basketball gods will never let T-Mac, and Mr.Whirlwind 360 get on the same team toghether to be scoring threats off the bench playing minor minutes, without letting their egos get in the way. I would dream of that because that will instantly make the best scoring bench in the league but that will NEVER EVER EVER HAPPEn.

Too bad Rip Hamilton makes so much. I'm sure Detroit would love to get rid of him. He's on the backside of his career, has some left in the tank and would fit the team first requirement.

I'd only sign off on t-Mac if we allowed his career to come full circle by bringing in vince-sanity to let the cousins win their ring together

By the way Royce, why wouldn't Stevenson fit the "Thunder culture?" He seems like a good guy to me. I haven't heard of him causing any problems with the Mavs or anything. He seemed okay knowing Jason Terry would come in for him and get the lion's share of the minutes at the 2. Seems like a team-oriented player to me.

If I had to choose from Royce's list, I'd honestly pick DeShawn Stevenson. He can play defense and unlike Thabo, MAKES his open 3's. He also wouldn't cost as much as some of those other names.

If Brooks is insistent on keeping Harden as our 6th man, Stevenson would be a perfect fit for our starting lineup. That would kind of squeeze out Reggie Jackson though.

I think what we really need isn't a replacement for KD, its a replacement for Harden. Thabo can fill the hole of kd's 8min he's off, but what our team will really be missing (unless r. jackson can bring it in his 1st year) is a guy coming of the bench who can create plays and scoring opportunities for himself and others. I think in this case T-Mac is the best fit player wise, and although it's still a slight gamble, if you let him take ownership and responsibility for the 2nd unit i think the ego he has left will be satisfied.

Hill is by far the best choice.. I still want to keep cook tho

Not really we just need a solid 3 to back up KD for 10-12 minutes. Harden sucked last year at the beginning and we were alright. If Hardens O was good enough for the bench he should spark the team enough to blow teams out in the first quarter.

T-Mac is washed up and a team killer. I wouldn't touch him. Stevenson would barely even be an upgrade over Thabo. Honestly, I would prefer Dunleavy over anyone else mentioned in this bunch. We need offense if James is moving to the starting lineup.

Like them names. Grant Hill is another. Would be an improvement to what we got. Hopefully we make some kind of move for next year.

I like the conversation taking place here.

@ justin
A lot of the 'fountain of youth' mystique surrounding Phoenix has to be overblown, right? I mean, I'm sure they have a great training staff, but a lot of their prior success-rate has to be luck. Any contract for a 38yo is gonna carry a ton of risk, but who cares if it's a one year deal? I'd actually be more concerned about Hill's efficiency numbers taking a dive after removing Nash (though you could make the argument that Williams might have benefitted similarly from D'Antoni, and at least Hill plays solid d).

Sammy :@ justin You’d rather have Reggie Williams for 3y/$10m than Grant Hill on 1y/$6m?

I don't think Grant Hill lasts another year away from Phoenix...

I wouldn't pin much on the team passing on Hamilton. Scouting reports on him suggested he was not the kind of clubhouse presence that Presti requires from players.

@ justin
You'd rather have Reggie Williams for 3y/$10m than Grant Hill on 1y/$6m?

Jax Raging Bile Duct :Abandon all hope, ye who enter here.

Wow, T-Mac's Rockets stint really scarred you. Noted. Moving on.

Abandon all hope, ye who enter here.

@ justin I wouldnt put T-Mac on the same list as Iverson, Marberry,B. Diddy, or any of the other cancers. T-Mac was a part of teams that werent true championship contenders, and he had to shoulder the load majority of the time. I am almost certain he could get the ego in check if he fell in line with the Thunder. He would know that this is KD's team, and the team is a family.

Wasn't McGrady part of the Jon Kuester sit-out in Detroit and he was laughing at him from the bench? McGrady's a perfect fit talent and experience wise and I wouldn't mind him if I didn't believe he'd wreak havoc in the locker room. I'm usually not someone who pays too much mind to chemistry but McGrady is one of those guys who can destroy a team.

@ justin

I cant defend him according to that video. Obviously, it looks bad. Then again, it would be unfair to judge him according to the video because I dont know what happened before or during that game. I will say something though, that video makes my opinion of him look bad now.
That being said, I think T-Mac would do well with the Thunder because he knows he's past his prime, and the team is already set in its roles. Hell, I am a Nate Robinson fan and it sucks he doesnt get playing time, but I stand by Coach Brooks' choice in keeping his rotation the same. It will be sad to see Nate go, but there's no room for PT on this roster. I think T-Mac can be a contributor for a few minutes in a game, or situationals. He is a pure shooter, can handle the rock, and able to score. He wont be relied upon to be the first, second, third scoring option here, so anything from him would be extra for us.

I'd prefer a 6-7 to 6-9 wing as I am more interested in SF backup than another option at SG. I wouldn't give much time or money to those under 6'6. They'd have to have at least a decent 3 pt game and preferably an above average passing game.

McGrady could really help the Spurs if they wanted to give it one more shot.

As a long time Rocket fan, I spent a lot of time thinking along the lines of "TMac could really help if he could just return to his old form for even a few minutes".

It's a losing battle folks.

@ justin
On the off chance we got him, I'm sure Perk's scowl would keep him in line, haha.

McGrady would work on a team with lots of veterans who won't put up with his BS.

@ monkeyonx
I really like this, too, and had never even considered it. I also get the feeling that T-Mac would fit the community well and improve team chemistry rather than hurting it. I could be totally wrong, though, but T-Mac has always seemed like a pretty laid back player to me.

@ monkeyonx

Is this the guy you want on a contending team? Even in a minor role? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TjbkXewxlGI

I am drooling at the thought of adding T-Mac to the team. Yes, I know he's at the end of his career, but I think he'd be a great back up with glimpses of his former self. With him being in the league for a while and a massive scoring threat (in his prime), he can give the younger guys tips and leadership. Make the move!

Battier would be alright on 1- 2 year deal. He talks about playing 3-4 more years but he already faded quite a bit and I can't see him staying in the rotation of a good team 3-4 more years.