Home > Film Study > Film Study: Durant gives OKC five more minutes

Film Study: Durant gives OKC five more minutes

When Kevin Durant’s game-tying 3-pointer dropped through the net with six seconds left in Philadelphia last night, a lot of people thought finally. Finally Scott Brooks drew up a play that worked at the end of the game. Finally Oklahoma City executed said play.

There has been lots of talk about the Thunder in these situations — not as much as the Heat, though — and a lot has centered around the plays Brooks’ clipboard. A lot of the criticism has been that there’s no creativity, that everything is too straightforward and simple.

But upon closer examination of Durant’s big 3, I wouldn’t say it was an ingenious playcall or anything. I wouldn’t say it even close to one of Brooks’ finer sets. Fact is, it worked and that’s what makes it good. I’ve always said about these last second shot situations is how when the ball goes through the net, it suddenly makes a set look really great. And when one clangs long, the play is crap.

That’s why it’s always nice to have a player like KD that can turn a bad play to a very good one just because he’s capable of making tough shots. And that was really the case against the 76ers Wednesday.

From the outset, the play is obvious. With where Serge Ibaka is set up, it’s clear that Durant is about to run off his screen. It all comes down to how good the screen is and maybe more importantly, how good KD sets his man up.

Andre Iguodala is on Durant and is very good at staying on someone’s hip despite getting picked and pushed. So the play starts with Durant giving a small false step toward the paint and pushing Iguodala away to get a little initial separation.

The pick from Ibaka is far from great. He kind of misses and really just sticks his butt out to try and at least get a piece of Iguodala.

What I’m curious about is why not use Nick Collison to set the pick? Is it because that would’ve made things too obvious if Collison were set up where Ibaka is? Or is it because Doug Collins had put Evan Turner in on Ibaka, so if there was a switch, KD would have the smaller Turner on him?

I don’t really know the reason to go with a weaker screen setter in Ibaka there, because I’d have favored Collison.

In that same moment though, you can see Turner is kind of the one that screwed the pooch. He definitely should’ve hedged out on the screen and denied the ball from Westbrook to Durant. Yes, it probably would’ve opened a slip for Ibaka to dive to the bucket, but with 10 seconds left, I think you’d trade those two points instead of giving Durant a decent look for 3.

On the catch, KD has just a little space. It’s not a lot, but it’s enough, since he’s basically seven feet tall. Again, look at Turner. He’s in no man’s land. He’s not doing anything. Probably the ideal defense here if the 76ers could do it over would be for Turner to help on KD, Meeks to rotate down to cover Ibaka leaving Thabo open in the corner. That’s what I’d have done.

But you can see that the play was at least good enough, because Durant has some room. Which is all he needs. Some.

Still, let’s not act like this shot wasn’t contested or defended well. Iguodala is right there. But Durant makes it all work and look lovely because he’s super awesome at basketball.

Share:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • del.icio.us
  • Fark
  • StumbleUpon

Film Study

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest

Thunder247 :@dylan Yea, I think that is a vaild point of view. Personally I think you are trying to get the best shot the first time but I could see the offensive rebounding idea, however it still does not explain the Thabo inbounding thing. Also he is a terrible inbounder and has numberous mistakes inbounding late in the game. Brooks is loyal to a fault.

Since you know so much, maybe you should take Brooks' place. If you don't have something legitimate to complain about, try not complaining. Thank you and please drive thru!

I mean, if I hand you a hundred dollars are you going to bitch because its not a hundred and one dollars?

@everyone - I think it doesn't matter what the Thunder and Brooks do late in a game except for turn wine into water, some member of this board **cough,cough-you know who you are** will whine and complain to no end. What do you want to bet that 99% of those type folk have NEVER even come close to playing basketball for money?? Peeps need to chill. We won. We are on pace to be better than last year, take a valium or something! lol

Good analysis, Royce. I thought when I saw it live that Iggy was right up on Durant, and the replay only confirmed it. Ibaka's screen wasn't that great and even though KD got a little room, Iguodala recovered and was right there. It was just one heck of a shot by Durant. Because, well, that's what he does.

On a totally unrelated note, this is the second time in a week I've come across an article that included the words, "screwed the pooch."

This worries me.

Ha, super awesome at basketball. Nice breakdown.

@dylan
I was really pleased with the play last night, and would like to think i would have been even if he had missed it. I'm with you.

Not a great play. The 76ers should've switched on the screen or sent both at Durant. Giving up an alleyoop too Ibaka doesn't matter when the Thunder needed a 3.

Why don't teams ever foul? Obviously not Durant who was shooting almost as quickly as he got the ball, but why doesn't Holiday slap Westbrook's hands before he can even pass to KD? Russ was 2-5 from the stripe that game, and KD was the only player on the court who could realistically hit a three. Worst case, Russ hits both his shots, Philly still up 1 with the ball. It seems silly to me that more teams don't foul.

Not to take anything away from KD's shot, just saying.

DavyTheWise :@dylan

Good point about collison; it would def depend on the amount of time we had left on the clock, but if we are inbounding at half court like last night its not too far to where ibaka was setting that screen. I am just saying there are other options, like we all are.

Oh, I know. But even last night, let's say Collison inbounds it to Westbrook and runs to Ibaka's spot and sets up for the pick, 4 or 5 seconds have gone off the clock. Now Durant is taking the shot with 3 seconds left — no time for a rebound-kick out. So you have Ibaka on one end standing around. Harden out there - FINALLY - but doing nothing because the play is called for Durant and by the time he gets the ball, it's too late for anything but him jacking up a prayer. And meanwhile Westbrook is at the top of the key dribbling the ball, barely resisting the urge to put the shot up himself.

The play call last night was about as good as you can get in that situation. You need a 3-point attempt, you need to get the ball to your best player so he can take it and you need him to take the shot and leave enough time on the clock so someone could theoretically pull down a miss and kick it out for attempt No. 2.

@dylan
Good point about collison; it would def depend on the amount of time we had left on the clock, but if we are inbounding at half court like last night its not too far to where ibaka was setting that screen. I am just saying there are other options, like we all are.

dylan :
Right, but the possibility exists that Thabo is significantly better at late-game inbounding than Harden is. Now, I’m not making that claim, but Brooks didn’t just pull Thabo’s name out of a hat and go “Welp, this is my guy forever” no matter how much it might seem like that, heh.
The coaches are comfortable with Thabo doing it, that’s enough for me unless it just becomes completely apparent that he’s awful at it or something.

You know you cringed after saying Brooks probably didn't just decide soemthing and then stick with it forever. I know I did.

@DavyTheWise
Asking a lot for a guy Collison's size to inbound the ball then sprint to wherever and set a pick. Sounds like an illegal screen call waiting to happen.

I'd rather see Harden in the game at that stage too, PARTICULARLY at that stage. I'm just saying it's easy for us as fans to call for a switch, but the staff sees these guys 100000 times more than we do, so unless it's just obvious stupidity, i'd rather defer to the professionals.

Right, but the possibility exists that Thabo is significantly better at late-game inbounding than Harden is. Now, I'm not making that claim, but Brooks didn't just pull Thabo's name out of a hat and go "Welp, this is my guy forever" no matter how much it might seem like that, heh.

The coaches are comfortable with Thabo doing it, that's enough for me unless it just becomes completely apparent that he's awful at it or something.

@dylan
Except that Harden is a proven passer on the floor, maybe that doesn't translate to inbounding? plus like we have all pointed out, he's much more of a 3pt/drive and dish threat. I'm not a bball whiz, but it seems like he might make a difference. seems like collison makes good decisions and some pretty nifty passes. He could pass it in and then get in position to make a screen around the perimeter.

@dylan
Other then they would be forced to guard Harden of course.

I hate having him inbound it too, but it's possible we just think he's terrible at it since we see him do it 90% of the time.

He's got a larger sample to draw from so of course he has more mistakes (which stand out more) on his record.

It's easy to say "IT SHOULD BE HARDEN" or whatever, but I'm not sure there's any real compelling evidence for the switch.

@dylan
Yea, I think that is a vaild point of view. Personally I think you are trying to get the best shot the first time but I could see the offensive rebounding idea, however it still does not explain the Thabo inbounding thing. Also he is a terrible inbounder and has numberous mistakes inbounding late in the game. Brooks is loyal to a fault.

Thunder247 :@innocent
bystander
Out of those, who do you thin we are better (could beat in a playoff series) then? I say Orlando and Dallas are the only ones that we would have a decent chance against (unless Perk is the real deal).

don't think we're better than any of those -- except OKC (we're much better than them, heh)

playing any of those top seeds will be murder. but hey, that's what the post-season is all about!

I'm a little confused as to why they had KD run off Ibaka's side, though. Unless it was designed as a read where Durant had the option of going up either side, and he picked the side he did.

Durant took the shot with 8 seconds in there. As much as you need a 3-point shooter in down 3, if you know Durant is taking the shot, it's better to have offensive rebounders in there, too.

@dylan
If collison is not goint to set the screen, why have him in there. We needed a three, why not put another three point shooter in for him (or Ibaka)? We play small ball for 3/4 of the game, then on the one possesion that we need a three and good spacing we decide to go big (and with only one shooter)?

@innocent bystander
Out of those, who do you thin we are better (could beat in a playoff series) then? I say Orlando and Dallas are the only ones that we would have a decent chance against (unless Perk is the real deal).

Thunder247 :
I guess I still don’t give brooks a pass on this play. Why did we only have one three point shooter in when it was obvious that you needed a three? Why have collison in if he was not going to setting the screen? Why have Thabo in instead a a three point shooter? I think what happened is we took advantage of a young teams poor defensive play and Durant made a great shot. I get it, Durant made the shot and we are all happy, but really a good playoff team would have doubled Durant and left Collison, Thabo and Ibaka realitively open. Putting Harden/Cook/Maynor in there along with a big, westbrook and Durant just seems to make more sense. Am I crazy?

The only person you can switch out is Thabo for Harden, and Thabo has earned his title of ALWAYS INBOUNDER for whatever reason.

it nice to be one of the 8 teams with 40+ wins right now

4 in the East (Boston, Chicago, Miami, Orlando)
4 in the West (San Antonio, Dallas, LA, OKC)

:)

The "bad" pick wasn't Ibaka's fault, nothing else he can do there. It's an open court, Iguodala can just go around him.

I guess I still don't give brooks a pass on this play. Why did we only have one three point shooter in when it was obvious that you needed a three? Why have collison in if he was not going to setting the screen? Why have Thabo in instead a a three point shooter? I think what happened is we took advantage of a young teams poor defensive play and Durant made a great shot. I get it, Durant made the shot and we are all happy, but really a good playoff team would have doubled Durant and left Collison, Thabo and Ibaka realitively open. Putting Harden/Cook/Maynor in there along with a big, westbrook and Durant just seems to make more sense. Am I crazy?

Steven :After the PHO game, Tramel asks Durant why he doesn’t ever try curling off a screen late in the game, and Durant says “I wish you guys knew more about the game of basketball.” He goes on to explain that defenders switch off screens late in the game so catch-and-shoot opportunities are rarely there.
Guess this was one of those rare times, eh KD.

That was stupid by Philly. Most teams would cheat on KD. They should have cheated off on KD.

After the PHO game, Tramel asks Durant why he doesn't ever try curling off a screen late in the game, and Durant says “I wish you guys knew more about the game of basketball.” He goes on to explain that defenders switch off screens late in the game so catch-and-shoot opportunities are rarely there.

Guess this was one of those rare times, eh KD.

I think Serge is in because he can go get a rebound better. We shot with 7 seconds left if we miss I would have to think Serge would have a better chance of going up over everyone and getting a rebound to kick back out. Plus if by chance there is a scramble and that player ends up having to heave a 3 up, Serge has a better chance of nailing a 3. I think part of the reason the screen looked so bad but was effective is that Iggy took a wide path around the screen. That gave KD the 1/2 a second he needed and had the same affect as a great screen.

Kevin's catch-and-shoot thing is like Robert Redford in 'Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid'. Asked to just point his gun and shoot something, Sundance misses badly.

"Can I move?"
"What?"
"I'm much better when I move"

then pulls his gun out in a moving spin and shoots hits target three times in flash.

just wait til perk is setting the screen

@Keith
13% looks like a pretty huge difference to me. That's like the difference between KD and Thabo

man, I had just been studying that video... then you post this (cue Twilight Zone music)

yea, Serge's pick was pretty lame. But it turned out that Durant didn't really need it anyway. Just a tiny window where he's open and... that's it.

KD is so much better with the quick catch-and-shoot. It's kinda weird. Maybe when he has more time, he starts thinking about and over-adjusts or something.

@steve.thunderfan
What did the numbers say? Durant is somewhere around 43% from three on catch and shoot jumpers, as opposed to 30-something on self-made 3s? I agree with Royce, this wasn't a great play, nor did the moving parts up to KD's shot do what they were supposed to. KD just hit a huge shot that was tightly contested.

ya at least he had a catch and shoot

it was better than durant iso.