Home > Commentary > New Year’s resolutions for the Thunder

New Year’s resolutions for the Thunder

Ron Turenne/NBAE/Getty Images

It’s hard to complain about the first two months of Oklahoma City’s season — though many do anyway. The Thunder entered 2010 just four games over .500 on its way to a 50-win season, but enters 2011 well above that mark and appears set to win more than 50 games this year.

Still, there’s plenty of room for improvement. The Thunder could and should make, and stick to, several new year’s resolutions in 2011 that could push it to a top-four seed in the West playoffs. Just like many people look themselves in the mirror on Jan. 1 and say to themselves, “I will do (blank) to become a better person,” Oklahoma City would be well-served to look itself in the mirror and tell itself the following:

1. Serge Ibaka will become a better positional defender.

Ibaka is without a doubt the most intimidating interior presence for the Thunder. But as a positional defender, he is far from being the most effective. Most of Ibaka’s highlight-reel blocks come as he bails out a teammate or stands tall against a face-to-the-basket offensive player who is challenging the rim.

But Ibaka has plenty of work to do with his man-to-man post defense. The ability and the effort is there — chances are, most Thunder fans remember his outstanding defense against none other than Tim Duncan in a late-season loss to the Spurs last season, in which he held the Big Fundamental to zero fourth-quarter points. But guys like Luis Scola and Carlos Boozer have made Ibaka look downright ordinary in recent weeks.

To be sure, Scola and Boozer abuse just about everyone in the NBA when they’re playing well. But for the Thunder to make a run in the playoffs, Ibaka needs to combine his own athleticism, strength and size with the skill of someone like Nick Collison. Considering he’s only 21-years-old, I’m sure the improvement will come. The sooner the better for an Oklahoma City team on the verge of true contention.

2. The Broingtons will ride again.

OK, so maybe this won’t really help much in the quest for home-court advantage in the first round. But the fans want what the fans want.

The Broingtons took the Thunder community by storm shortly after James Harden joined the team as a rookie, taking to the airwaves with their own homemade music video versions of popular club-thumpers. And then about the same time the Broingtons T-shirt came out, and Durant told the world about their genesis on his blog, they faded away.

These are the kinds of things that have endeared the Thunder players to the local market, and NBA fans at large. These guys are legitimately friends, which seems to be a rarity in the league. Even though there are no Broington releases of late, the team’s chemistry still appears to be fine. But couldn’t the band get back together every now and then to show the world how much cooler the Thunder is to follow than other NBA teams?

(h/t to DT commenter innocentbystander for bringing this up in the comment section of the Santa column. The Broingtons need to come back, plain and simple.)

3. James Harden will stay aggressive.

Harden’s emergence as an aggressive offensive force has been well-covered in this space and others and well-received by his teammates and coaches. His play in December has practically been the equivalent of an in-season trade — the timid, unsure Harden was replaced by the new version.

Check out Harden’s game-by-game stats. Through the Mavs game on Dec. 27, Harden scored at least 10 points in all but two December contests. That’s by far his best scoring month in Oklahoma City. His 3-point shooting has dipped from a red-hot 44 percent in November to a still-good 40 percent in December, but his overall field goal shooting percentage is up to 45 percent from 40 percent, a sign of taking better shots and not settling. His TS% is up to .588 so far this year and is improving, a healthy bump from .551 in his rookie season.

The improvement he’s shown in December is the kind of improvement everyone wants to see from the No. 3 pick in the draft a year and a half ago. More of this, and Oklahoma City will be more dangerous in April and beyond.

4. Russell Westbrook will cut down on turnovers.

Westbrook’s overall improvement this season has made the Thunder undeniably more formidable, and is reminiscent of the third-year leap Durant made last year. But one troubling statistic stands out: Westbrook’s turnovers-per-36-minutes is at 3.9 as of Dec. 28, which would edge the 3.7 from his rookie season for his career worst if it holds steady through the end of the season.

Westbrook brings a dynamism to Oklahoma City that necessitates heavy minutes. Anyone who argues otherwise hasn’t watched the Thunder play or checked out its record. But the maddening tendency to play just a little bit out of control, and turn the ball over at inopportune times (as if there was a good time…), will almost certainly come back to haunt Oklahoma City at a critical juncture if he doesn’t work to cut turnovers. Sure, more on-ball time will result in more turnovers, but at this point you’d expect some improvement in that area from a third-year player, regardless of usage.

Luckily for the Thunder, Westbrook is a gym rat and a competitive sonuvagun, like pretty much everyone else on the roster. If we’ve noticed that his turnovers are rising, chances are he has too. And chances are he hates it.

5. Someone will replace Durant as the team’s leading rebounder.

Rebounding has been an obvious weakness of the Thunder ever since it arrived in Oklahoma City. Rebounding-by-committee has worked to the point of getting the Thunder to the cusp of the elite, but getting past the cusp will require better rebounding. And Durant’s 6.6 RPG figure shouldn’t even be close to leading the team, but leading the team he is.

Part of that is the frontcourt rotation that splits minutes betweek Ibaka, Collison and Nenad Krstic. There’s a good chance Ibaka, or even Collison, would lead the team if they played starters’ minutes on a consistent basis. So maybe worries over the rebounding statistics from an individual standpoint are overblown.

And maybe the answer is the eventual (we hope) emergence of Cole Aldrich, which won’t happen this season and shouldn’t frighten anyone who pays attention. If he can play starters’ minutes next year, he should step in as the team’s leading rebounder if Ibaka hasn’t already done so. But someone needs to get more than 6.6 boards per game, and that someone needs to play the four or five.

What else?

Share:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • del.icio.us
  • Fark
  • StumbleUpon

Commentary

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest

What if we drafted Love, Westbrook and then Ibaka. Championship team right there, hands down. Darn Super Sonics:)

What is the best site for NBA trade rumors?

@p
Just saw your comment. I obviously agree since I said something similar.

It's a long season. I don't care what Barkley or whoever thinks about our team, I just care what OUR team thinks about our team. I trust Presti and the org to make the best decisions about what we need to help us short AND long term. I'd love to get a 7ft. Center that can start and avg. 12/9/2 and a shooter like Reddick, but we'll just have to be patient and hope for the best. I do think we're at least these two pieces away from really contending for the West.

i don't care what the #s or barkley says ... i know we have weak areas ... but i rather be appreciative that okc is only 6.5 games behind a spurs team thats been on fire & is on pace to win 70 games ... its a long season, & we have more capability than the "elites" (except maybe lal) to improve before the playoffs ... because our defense is clearly not up to last seasons level yet ...

with all that said, we still are so much better record-wise than last season at this point. & still feel like they can win a first round series

Everything I heard from Barkley I agreed with ('cept the stupid cable comment), but I also agreed with Kenny.

WHO IS our best big guy?? Ibaka or Collison def.

However we are currently 4th (I believe) in the West, like late last year we are in the race, if we win a few key conf games it puts the Thunder in good position.

I had a dream where we straight up traded Harden for JaVale McGee. It seemed so real at the time, and I have to say, I was both a little excited and a little pissed.

Anyone reading Darnell's twitter feed last night as he talked with some fans about trade possibilities for the Thunder? It's pretty clear he's not totally into it, but interesting to hear some of his insights. Particularly the part about frugality becoming cheapness, which is kind of in line with the thinking of a lot of people around here, I think.

Yes, the mediocre defense keeps the Thunder from being elite. Also, we don't get much productivity from the PF or C positions. Our PF's and C's rank 25th and 23rd in the league respectively in rebounds per game. Using our wing players to crash the boards makes it more difficult to key fast breaks and on the offensive glass creates poor matchups on defense. How many times have we seen Russ go for an offensive rebound, not get it, and end up with mis-matches on defense?

All of the teams mentioned have big guys at PF or C who are at least productive somewhere. The Thunder too rely heavily on the wings.

Sammy :
My first speculative totally unsubstantiated thought when I heard the Aldrich news was ‘I wonder if Presti and Brooks don’t see eye to eye on Cole.’ My impression of Presti is he wouldn’t think of meddling with the coaches rotations, but he does get to control who gets sent to and recalled from the d-league.
Anyway, it’s ridiculously early to speculate on Aldrich’s NBA future. Though man would it suck if he was just one of those many talented big men that just can’t figure out how to play without fouling.
Jazz-thunder is both the most likely series and the series I would be most excited to see. I don’t think we stand a chance vs anyone else. I keep thinking that it might come down to home court, but honestly, I wouldn’t mind playing 4 games in slc. We seem to like playing in Utah. I don’t think Utah would be more than 60-40. Trying not to count my chickens but I’m excited about that series already. I probably love hating Utah more than I do the lakers.

By saying we don't stand a chance against anyone else, do you mean of the top three or all 7 other playoff teams? The way I see it, we are going to finish no worse than fifth, which probably places against the Jazz, but we have a chance to finish as high as third, which would give us a winnable series I would think.

@f5alcon

I was fairly funny when Charles replied to Kenny stating that Green is not a big man. Honestly as cuckoo as Barkley can be he made some valid points.

The rebounding issue is not that we don't rebound it's that we rely on the guards to rebound too often. Occasionally that leads us to getting burned on transition D.

The lack of defense was well established with BoardsofOklahoma's post.

Chuck also mentioned turnovers. Russ and KD were among the top 10 in turnovers earlier this season. Oddly enough we have the fourth lowest team TO% (12.9%). Only San Antonio, Philly and Cleveland are better.

@BoardsofOklahoma
No team is perfect and every team has advantage and weakness.Great team can get more from their advantage than they loss from weakness.Jazz and Thunder are top 10 now,but if they did better in Reb%(jazz) or 3p%(thunder),they can be better.

Sammy :
Anyway, it’s ridiculously early to speculate on Aldrich’s NBA future. Though man would it suck if he was just one of those many talented big men that just can’t figure out how to play without fouling.

I think this is the single best reason to send him back to the d-league. There aren't great scorers in that league but there are plenty of athletes. He needs time to get accustomed to the speed of the game at this level until he learns he can't reach like he got away with all the rest of his life.

My first speculative totally unsubstantiated thought when I heard the Aldrich news was 'I wonder if Presti and Brooks don't see eye to eye on Cole.' My impression of Presti is he wouldn't think of meddling with the coaches rotations, but he does get to control who gets sent to and recalled from the d-league.

Anyway, it's ridiculously early to speculate on Aldrich's NBA future. Though man would it suck if he was just one of those many talented big men that just can't figure out how to play without fouling.

Jazz-thunder is both the most likely series and the series I would be most excited to see. I don't think we stand a chance vs anyone else. I keep thinking that it might come down to home court, but honestly, I wouldn't mind playing 4 games in slc. We seem to like playing in Utah. I don't think Utah would be more than 60-40. Trying not to count my chickens but I'm excited about that series already. I probably love hating Utah more than I do the lakers.

@BoardsofOklahoma
you found the issue, its the points allowed, according to brooks were are a defensive team, and we certainly dont play like it, its the switching and help defense that really does us in.

Longtime DT reader (as well as comments creeper) but first time
poster. I'm a huge fan of the site and appreciate your work, Royce. (as well as all the other great posters here)

I watched the TNT halftime show earlier and laughed again at chuck
making turrible insights (I use that word lightly) on the "elite"
teams of the NBA. His points were (yet again) that if we "rebounded and played a little defense" we would be with the best. When he said that I knew I had to see where we stood compared to the Jazz and the other major contenders currently.

Avg RPG per team:
Spurs - 42.2 (8th)
Mavs - 42.1 (11th)
Lakers - 44.6 (T-2nd)
Jazz - 39.3 (28th)
Thunder - 41.2 (16th)

Rebound Rate (Off/Def/Tot):
Spurs - 25.8/74.7/50.4 (15th/11th/13th)
Mavs - 22.9/74.9/50.6 (27th/10th/T-11th)
Lakers - 29.8/71.7/51.7 (4th/25th/T-5th)
Jazz - 25.7/70.6/48.5 (16th/27th/23rd)
Thunder - 26.3/73.8/50.4 (13th/T-18th/T-14th)

So, not so much of a difference in rebounding that it puts us out anyones league except for the Lakers (and they take the cake over all of the other contenders). And, obviously, these numbers do not point to us being so deficient we could not hang with any of these teams on any given night (specifically the elite Jazz) And, I understand maybe he was trying to make a point that in big game situations we don't have that go-to rebounder that we can rely on... blah blah blah But, then again, why am I trying to make excuses for chuck being obtuse?

Now on to defense:

Pts allowed:
Spurs - 97.6 (14th)
Mavs - 93.1 (6th)
Lakers - 97.5 (T-12th)
Jazz - 97 (10th)
Thunder - 101.4 (21st)

Def eff rating:
Spurs - 100.9 (8th)
Mavs - 99.8 (5th)
Lakers - 101.8 (10th)
Jazz - 103.5 (14th)
Thunder - 104 (17th)

So, there you go. The Thunder fair worse on this than with rebounding... But, the question is does this discrepancy take us from being elite? If we are removed from this list, how are the Jazz not? Same record. They allow slightly fewer ppg and we score slightly more ppg. But we do rebound better.

Bah, I'm tired but I was looking this up and wanted to share. I guess my overall point is, chuck obviously doesn't check any of his statements against any fact or numbers. That and, it would be a great series if there were a 4/5 matchup (I'll just cross my fingers for the 4 in that situation)

@shiki=4 seasons
we have a very good chance of holding the division tiebreakers

In Northwest,four teams are over 50% and our division record is 6-1,it is great.

Most playoff forecasts have us playing the Jazz in a fourth vs. fifth seed matchup right now. That'd be a great series.

@justin
I think you're right about the Jazz being favored but I would wonder how much of that would be based on playoff experience and name recognition and how much would be based on an honest assessment of the matchups.

I think Utah would be heavily favored against us in a seven game series, especially if they are 100%.

Still he acts like we have no chance against Utah. Charles, we beat them three times last year. Our records are exactly the same.

@clarkem
I gotta disagree with you there. Collison is a better straight up defender but Serge (when compared to Nick) makes up for it with his shot blocking and surpasses Nick with a better offensive skill set and is better at running the floor and finishing on the break.

@f5alcon
I thought also thought that answer more or less evidenced that Kenny hadn't actually watched that many Thunder games.

It would be nice to have a definitive solution in the front court. The Sonics and now the Thunder have had a donut in the middle almost as far back as I can remember.

clarkem :
Serge is not our best big man. Right now its Nick Collison, easy.

Pretty sad statement if you think on that too hard.

@Thomas
jeff green is the safe answer because they dont really follow the thunder.

Serge is not our best big man. Right now its Nick Collison, easy.

Anonymous :

f5alcon :westbrrok is the biggest offender, he gives up more penetration than a porn star

Hehe

was gonna say Ashlynn Brooke keep with the oklahoma theme, but i couldnt spell her name right at work and obviously couldnt look it up.

speaking of again...

Spurs win... AGAIN

I give you the 2010-2011 San Antonio Spurs -- truly, the greatest basketball team of all time, I guess (*shrugs shoulders*)

@DizzyDai

*can't think of Ibaka's name.

@Thomas

I wouldn't say good stuff. Barkley made a stupid comment about OKC not having cable. Kenny doesn't know enough about our team if he can think of Ibaka's name. I hope KD and company makes Kenny's prediction of 3 seed come true.

Thanks Portland! 'preciate it!

Even with the Jazz... again.

Anybody else watching Inside the NBA? They just spent about 5 minutes devoted to the Thunder because KD tweeted about their comments in the pre-game. Pretty cool stuff. Barkley posed the question, "Who's their best big guy?" Kenny responded "Jeff Green." (I'm sitting here saying no its Serge dammit!). Anyhow good stuff.

Ozark :New Years resolutions for Brian Davis :1. 50% reduction in “southern plains” references2. Everything inside the 3 pt line is not necessarily “the nail” or “elbow”3. Don’t do weird delayed constipated sounding screams 3 seconds after a dunk.4. quit confusing Ibaka/Green and Harden/Durant for one another. I mean, really, how can you mistake someone else for Harden?5. Fewer references like last nights “got knocked be-hind over t-gel” – does Harden have dandruff and use coal tar shampoo? Behind over T-gel? WTF?6. quit calling out good passes before they get stolen by opponents.7. Only use “stickman” occasionally when the margin is one point.
Really though, I think he has great voice when he’s not sreaming like he’s constipated.
Grant Long1. Quit saying “You’ve got to dunk the ball” every time someone misses at the rim. This is not NBA Jam.2. Reduce “get on the floor” references.3. Comment on offensive strategy beyond “ball movement” and the occasional pointing out of screen setting. On the rare occasions we use set plays, use the telestrator to break it down.4. The third quarter is not the final period of the game.
I think Long’s goofiness and disinhibition could be endearing with improvement in substance, though.

This is genious.

Josh :@Daniel Hawaii.You really from Hawaii?

Yup, born and raised. I was a Sonics fan but have no affiliation with Seattle so it was easy for me keep following the team after the move to OKC. Also, why wouldn't I keep following a team that's exciting with so much young talent?!

I watch every game via NBA League Pass.

justin :
My New Year’s Resolutions:
- Play Jeff Green fewer minutes, and limit his three point attempts.
- Play James Harden more minutes.
- Instruct players to stop over helping on defense and leaving their men wide open on the perimeter. This is not a sound defensive strategy.
- Be active in talks approaching the dead line to fill the donut hole in the middle.
- Stop playing small ball in critical game situations.

Pretty much sums up mine.

I think it should also be a new year's resolution that everyone except for byron mullens should begin growing playoff beards like they do in hockey.

My spam catcher is kind of going wonky right now so a lot of posts are being moderated that shouldn't be.

Sorry about that everyone.

I'm currently re-watching the Dallas game (defense only) and I'm going to count how many times each player helped off their man when the help wasn't needed, or trailed on a screen leaving the screener wide open.

Man, we've got 45 comments as of this moment. No game tonight. No major news this post is based on. Just talking about the team. Daily Thunder has got to be the best NBA team specific fan community on the web. Maybe Celtics blog on the SB Nation is better but if its better its can't be by much. Kudos to Royce and Daily Thunder.

I guess all replies are moderated now. :)

dream catcher :i see all the messages

They just got unmoderated.

i see all the messages

Here's a test, this was the first one, that is still waiting:

I just hope they beat the Mavs in Dallas. And I don’t get beat up in my Durant jersey at the game. I hate the Mavs

wow, apparently every time I reply it has to wait for moderation?

@f5alcon
I have no idea, I have a comment waiting for moderation that I can't imagine being offensive?

i guess moderation rules changed, but what changed exactly?

whats up with the moderation?

@f5alcon
I just hope they beat the Mavs in Dallas. And I don't get beat up in my Durant jersey at the game. I hate the Mavs

@gr8ball83
i hope that means KD and the gang are ready to beat down the hawks

@Daniel Hawaii.
You really from Hawaii?

Trackbacks

  1. [...] Thunder offers its year-end resolutions for the Thunder players.  A little more interior presence would me so [...]