Home > Commentary > The burden of expectation in a brand new world

The burden of expectation in a brand new world

Andrew D. Berstein/NBAE/Getty Images

DOWNLOAD THE DAILY THUNDER PREVIEW BOOK

I hate going into movies with expectations. In a way, your mind can be made up about a flick before you see it based on your friend raving about it or bashing it down. How can I possibly come out of National Treasure 2 and say I liked it if three of my friends ripped it to shreds the day before? Not because I’m afraid to like something my friends don’t, but more so that I’m seeing the movie already knowing that people of similar taste as me hated it. So that movie better be really good to impress me because I’ve got some serious prejudice heading in.

I remember how high my hopes were for Indiana Jones 4. Like I don’t know if I’ve ever been so excited for a movie. Actually, I don’t know if I’ve ever been so excited for anything. My favorite movie character back on screen after over 20 years off? Yes. Please. Harrison Ford was back and looked great in the previews. Steven Spielberg preached for months about how he directed this one with the fans in mind. George Lucas went through screenplay after screenplay looking for the perfect script. Everything was coming together for a serious excellent movie. And I couldn’t wait.

Like a huge nerd with no life, I saw it at midnight. I sat through two hours, didn’t say a word to anyone and then the credits came up. And something unexpected happened.

It sucked.

How could it be? How could a movie with the caliber of talent surrounding it be bad? I figured Indiana Jones 4 could be ancient scrapbooking and I’d love it. But it just wasn’t good. And I was devastated.

Later that summer another movie I was absolutely certain would be good was released. I had equally high hopes and actually, these may have been a little higher because this director didn’t really have any blemishes on his resume unlike George Lucas who tried to ruin my childhood a few years earlier with Jar Jar Binks. Based on a few early reviews, the hype from a key actor’s death, the cast and the awesome looking previews, I was convinced The Dark Knight would be awesome. I wasn’t even a bit gun shy with what happened with Indy 4.

This time, expectations achieved. And then some. I’ve seen that movie probably six or seven times now and there’s really not a thing I’d gripe about. It’s not a perfect movie nor is it my favorite, but it met every high hope I had for it.

And then there’s the third end of the spectrum with expectations. When you have none, that is. I remember seeing O Brother, Where Art Thou? in high school. I had no idea who the Coen’s were. I just knew George Clooney was in this movie and some friends wanted to see it. I didn’t have any preconceived notion as to whether it would be good or bad. It was really a treat to just walk in nearly blind and appreciate the two hour pictureshow for what it was. Of course the movie was stellar and I left with a great taste.

And here’s where I start bringing this home. Last season for the Thunder was O Brother Where Art Thou. In fact, it may have been something more like The Social Network, a movie that I fully expected to be bored with that turned out to be completely fantastic. But the point is, there weren’t expectations for anything and when the team did what it did, it couldn’t have been more fun. After 35 wins, it really was all gravy.

Setting the bar high isn't a bad thing. What we all really want is a trophy. Being satisfied with 50 wins and a playoff series win doesn't actually mean anything. Forget building, forget the process, winning - now or later - is what counts. Windows don't stay open long in the NBA and right now OKC's just started cracking it.

Most felt as long as 2009-10 was a step forward, they’d be happy. And instead, the team won 50 games, Kevin Durant won the scoring title, Scott Brooks won Coach of the Year, Russell Westbrook potentially started making The Leap, the team went to the playoffs and they actually won a couple games. For last season, there’s really no accurate comparison. It was a thrill run unlike any other we’ll really experience ever again. It was a blank canvas and by the end of April, we were looking at the Mona Lisa.

The question is, what is this season? The 2010-11 campaign already has got the same hype as Indy 4 or The Dark Knight. This summer has been the equivalent of being bombarded with ads constantly. Everyone isn’t just expecting a good movie at this point from the Thunder, they’re expecting something Oscar worthy. They’re expecting a masterpiece.

I think for me, it kind of comes down to defining those expectations. You’ve got to understand what you want in order to be happy. But at the same time, those type of things go flying out the door in December when you get a taste of the team and the season. Like last year, I thought 35 wins would be a banner year. But by the end of February, my expectations had evolved and I was now expecting playoff basketball in Oklahoma City. If the Thunder had crumbled and missed the postseason but wound up with 47 wins, I’d have been disappointed. Which is kind of crazy.

This year, we’ll be faced with the same thing. Coming in, I think with the hype of the summer and the attention being thrown on Durant, expecting 50-55 wins seems right. And on top of that, some are feeling a Northwest Division title, maybe the No. 2 seed in the West and if things go well, a Western Conference Finals appearance. If it happens, well, we just got our Dark Knight. But let’s say OKC wins 48 games, gets the 7-seed and loses in six games in the playoffs. Is that an Indy 4 performance? Or were we expecting too much to start with for the STILL youngest group in the league? Hard to really say.

Here are four possible scenarios I’m looking at for this season:

THE DARK KNIGHT
Hype: validated. The Thunder starts off running, winning games at a high clip all the way through the season. Kevin Durant is better than last year, putting up 32.5 points per game, Russell Westbrook makes the All-Star team and the team’s role players start coming into their own. By the end of the year, Oklahoma City finishes with  a 34-7 home record en route to 56 wins. The Thunder finishes second in the West and in wins their opening round playoff series in five games.

The Thunder wins a gritty 7-game series in the quarters, then in the Western Finals, comes up just short against the Lakers in six. It’s another huge step in the direction of winning an NBA title and though the team didn’t get there, everything we hoped for this season happened. And going into 2011-12, we have serious playoff experience under our belts and are ready to legitimately challenge for the crown.

INDIANA JONES AND THE KINGDOM OF THE CRYSTAL SKULL
With fans expecting an easy 50-win season, some even start mentioning 60. The Thunder starts off a bit slow, going .500 in November and December. By the All-Star break, Oklahoma City is just five games over. There have been a few injuries and everyone is playing reasonably well, but players like Durant and Westbrook seem to be forcing it. They’re trying to be too great every night.

By the end of the year, Durant’s averages dip, Westbrook had a seemingly mediocre year and OKC finishes up at a fairly average 42-40. The Thunder miss the playoffs by a few games and most dub the season a disaster.

FUNNY PEOPLE
I fully realize that by comparing some of these scenarios to movies, I’m opening the door for my personal tastes to be ripped to shreds. But I was excited for Funny People. Adam Sandler was playing a pretty self-deprecating role, I think Seth Rogan is pretty funny and Judd Apatow has been pretty good at hitting home runs with 40-Year-Old Virgin and Knocked Up. It was a fairly hyped movie that good quality reviews from a lot of respected critics. Apatow was extremely high on it calling it by far his best movie.

So when I settled in, I expected a tremendous comedy that made me laugh while also having a quality story that provided a connection to the characters. It wasn’t bad. Actually, it was almost good. But it was far from great. To sum it up in a word, it was “meh.”

It was too long, too serious at parts and while Sandler was really good, it just never felt like the movie hit any kind of stride. There weren’t enough laughs and overall, I left with a meh feeling.

A meh season for the Thunder would probably be something like 45 wins, an eight-seed and another first round loss. I think we’d all leave feeling like we kind of got our money’s worth, but we’re definitely not buying this one on DVD. It wouldn’t be a bad season, but I don’t think we’d necessarily feel like it was a good one.

AVATAR
If you’re one of those people absolutely obsessed with Avatar and you dress up and paint your body blue and speak in Na’avi, stop reading now. Avatar wasn’t great. It was solid. It was good. But definitely not the fantastic, revolutionary movie everyone thought it was. (An aside: Why does everyone act like James Cameron invented 3D movies? I remember watching a cartoon in 3D when I was like eight.)

Avatar had its moments. Obviously it was gorgeous. It was like the best episode of Planet Earth on steroids. But it just didn’t have what it needed to truly be a tremendous movie. Maybe it was the story. Maybe it was the acting. Maybe it was the writing. Whatever it was, it was just missing something.

This is actually the season I see as most likely for the Thunder. Probably 50 wins, something like the six-seed in the West and maybe even a playoff series victory. In terms of expectations and hype, I think both labels would be satisfied. Nobody would feel like the season wasn’t a success and nobody should be disappointed. For a team that’s transitioning into legit contendership like the Thunder, a season like this would be another big step in the right direction.

But it wouldn’t be great. It wouldn’t be award worthy. Nobody would be calling Oklahoma City’s name for a season like that. And deep down, I think that’s what something are hoping for. I even fear that’s what some are expecting.

Setting the bar high isn’t a bad thing. What we all really want is a trophy. Being satisfied with 50 wins and a playoff series win doesn’t actually mean anything. Forget building, forget the process, winning – now or later – is what counts. Windows don’t stay open long in the NBA and right now OKC’s just started cracking it.

But at the same time, things don’t happen overnight. While there’s reason to be excited about this season and toss around things like 60 wins, an MVP trophy for KD and maybe even a Western Conference Finals berth, it’s a bit ambitious. Doesn’t mean it can’t happen though. Maybe they can top last year and just pull a remake of O Brother. I’d be cool seeing that movie again.

Share:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • del.icio.us
  • Fark
  • StumbleUpon

Commentary

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest

@4razr
Really? I didn't know Aldrich was hurt...

Best stat of the night: 10 t.o.s
Reasons not to worry too much about defense: No Thabo, Collison, even Kristic, who plays solid position D
Reason for concern: Aldrich has a knee injury (sprain)

Coach Pop on transition offense:

“We talk about it every year,” Popovich said. “This year, I’m demanding it.”

Offensively, I don't think there is a whole lot to complain about in this one. And the Thunder out rebounded them on both ends of the floor. If the Thunder had been prepared to face a Spurs team on a mission to finish in transition (tell me you thought that would happen), I think the complexion of the game would have been much different.

@DXL
While I agree with you, all of Ibaka's points were at the rim last night.

justin :

James :Ibaka with another +18 at center. 12 points, 6 rebounds and 4 blocks in 25 minutes. Green with 9 rebounds and 27 points on 21 shots +9. Solid game for both guys.

Spurs played scrubs for a lot of the second half.

Mainly just Duncan. The other guys were in when the Thunder made their run. Parker, Ginobli, Blair, Jefferson and Hill all got significant minutes in the 2nd half.

I was cruising the recaps from last night looking for some insights into more than just “the Thunder didn’t play defense” and “the Spurs didn’t play their starters in the second half.”

I found this piece http://www.48minutesofhell.com/2010/10/18/preseaso... talking about how the Spurs are trying harder to push the pace this year and how they didn’t feel they played very good defense last night. The Thunder shot 47.6 percent and 46.2 percent from three (Spurs shot 43.3 and 46.7 percent).

I didn’t get a chance to listen to the game, but looking at Jeff Green’s shot chart there is some good and some bad. He got most of his points (all but two buckets) in the paint within just a few feet of the basket. But he didn’t shoot well from range – missing everything beyond 12 ft or so and missing his only two 3pt attempts.

I was curious, so I took a look at the play by play to see if I could get a sense for the flow of the game. Frankly, I think the front court played fairly well. Despite the narrative that the Spurs ran away from the Thunder, this was a competitive game. Were it not for Ginobli’s pair of 3’s at the end of the first half, this game would have been within 4 points. When the Spurs finally pulled Blair and Jefferson at the end of the 3rd, the Thunder had already made up the deficit and were down by just one point.

And, Blair, Jefferson, Ginobli and Parker all got minutes in the fourth quarter. The Thunder played small ball while Durant was resting, with Mullens, Green, Cook, Westbrook and Maynor on the floor together for extended minutes. Durant entered the game for Maynor with about 8:30 left to play and hit a 3 to put the Thunder up by one. The Thunder starters (with Mullens instead of Ibaka) played the Parker, Ginobli, James Anderson, Blair and Jefferson and held court until the Spurs (up by four points) subbed backups for Ginobli and Parker with about 5:00 left to play.

The Thunder subbed Ibaka for Mullens. The starters then ran away with the game.

Obviously I didn’t watch the game, but based on the play-by-play the Thunder did a little better than the stories indicate – with the exception of transition defense.

Also, it looks to me like Serge Ibaka and Green did a really nice job on DeJuan Blair, holding him below his average points and shot percentage (last season, playoffs and this preseason). In fact, nearly all of Blair’s points were assisted or tip-ins. While those points might indicate soft PNR/PNP defense or that Ibaka might have been out of position (like the exchange where Ibaka blocked a shot and Blair got the tip), it also shows that Blair was not able to just post up and score as he has on most other teams.

justin :

James :Ibaka with another +18 at center. 12 points, 6 rebounds and 4 blocks in 25 minutes. Green with 9 rebounds and 27 points on 21 shots +9. Solid game for both guys.

Spurs played scrubs for a lot of the second half.

That's not entirely true. The Spurs starters got plenty of burn in the final frame, until about the 5 minute mark.... with the Spurs up by just 4 points.... at home.

No need for worry about Ron Adams and the defense. We're missing our two best defensive players, Thabo and Collison, we can't expect defense as straong as last year's. Once those two get back the defense will be fine. Once Krstic returns from injury and once Aldrich acclimates to the NBA game (that may not be until after the all-star break) the center position will be fine.

The really positive signs I'm taking from this pre-season: Harden and Ibaka have taken leaps in terms of their offensive ability. I think Harden could score an efficient 15 or 16 points a game this year. I think Ibaka's jump shot is now a real weapon.

That's what he needs to do. Backup SF.

I'm most worried about Brooks playing KD, Green and Westbrook so many minutes. What's he thinking?

Jeff Green did play decently on offense, though, especially when he was able to play at SF for stretches.

James :Ibaka with another +18 at center. 12 points, 6 rebounds and 4 blocks in 25 minutes. Green with 9 rebounds and 27 points on 21 shots +9. Solid game for both guys.

Spurs played scrubs for a lot of the second half.

Ibaka with another +18 at center. 12 points, 6 rebounds and 4 blocks in 25 minutes. Green with 9 rebounds and 27 points on 21 shots +9. Solid game for both guys.

justin :@James
What do you mean numbers wise? The Spurs scored 60 points in the first half and had 7 OREB. It sounded like we were getting pounded in the paint, and that the help defense was bad just like the rest of the preseason…

I'm sorry I didn't realize games were now only one half long? How did we do in the 2nd half?

@Ozark
The Grizz frontcourt DID make us look bad last year, but I agree that we shouldn't get ahead of ourselves. In my case I think it is confirmation bias. I expected to take a small hit defensively with Adams gone, so I am more worried when I see it happening.

Also, I wasn't a big fan of the consistently sub-par lineups we favored last year, so I become concerned that we won't see improvement this year.

Oh, no! Gloom and Doom! We beat the Spurs in the preseason, although we might have been weak in the paint with KD, Mullens, and White playing down there! No hope against the mighty Grizz this year!

@James

What do you mean numbers wise? The Spurs scored 60 points in the first half and had 7 OREB. It sounded like we were getting pounded in the paint, and that the help defense was bad just like the rest of the preseason...

Everyone keeps complaining about the big men. Numbers wise Ibaka and Green more than held their own. Obviously Duncan only played in the first half and I only listened to the 2nd half but it sounds like the entire team came out with a lot more intensity in the 2nd half (not just the bigs). I still don't think the Ibaka/Green combo is as dire straights as most of you.

@dream catcher
it wouldnt be far fetched if we start 1-5, the pistons are the only pushover team, bulls,blazers,jazz are playoff level teams and kaman griffin could be tough to stop without collison.

The big man rotation doesn't explain the horrible transition defense, though. 22 fast break points in the first half for the Spurs is inexcusable, preseason or not...

Nobody's dooming and glooming, the state of the defense is a legitimate concern, especially if Collison / Krstic aren't ready to go.

lets wait till the season starts till we start being all doom and gloom. This team has an ability to turn it on and off. Remember how bad our defense was to end last year? But as soon as the playoffs started we went to a whole different level.

If we start out 1-3 then ill be worried.

@Keith

It'd be a bummer if it was a Ron Adams thing. You'd think they'd be able to maintain the continuity...

I'm holding out some hope that it's a rotation issue. We've been throwing out a lot of wacky lineups, a lot of small lineups. Ibaka / Green will never really work defensively. The only real legitimate pairing we've seen this preseason hasn't even really been used that much (Aldrich / Ibaka), and even then it's one that obviously didn't see any action last year.

I mean, for parts of this game we had Durant / White at PF / C or even Durant / Mullens. That's just not going to succeed defensively.

Hopefully at least Nenad Krstic is healthy by the start of the season, and Aldrich can stay on the court if he's not. Coming into this game with Ibaka / Green / Durant / Mullens / White as our big man rotation I'm suprised we only gave up 60 points in the first half.

So is this because the guys don't have someone around everyday kicking them in the rear shouting "play defense!" (Ron Adams) or just an extended hangover from the offseason?

Really, the preseason has been close to a debacle. Brooks comes out and says he doesn't care about offense (not so smooth a move given we start 4 offensive non-factors) and that defense is the core. Then, we go out and stop playing defense in the preseason while also not doing much offensively. I mean, I'm hoping, praying that preseason doesn't mean anything, but where is the desire?

@justin

Pick and pop, not starting. Krstic isn't a starter IMO.

Mullens isn't going to replace Krstic. He's a long way from being even a legitimate NBA player much less NBA starter.

Dunno how to feel about this one since the Spurs didn't play their starters at the end and we had Green / Durant in for 40 minutes. If nothing else, I love what James Harden is doing. Green and Durant took a whole lot of shots...

I kinda wished their scrubs weren't playing now.

@Floppy Punch!
Well played, sir.

I wish I could synch ESPN Gamecast with the WWLS stream. No, wait. If I'm wishing I might as well just wish this was on TV. Or maybe for 100 million dollars. But synching would be pretty cool too.

Elegy444 :
What was KD’s Tech for?

Taking exception to a foul call.

What was KD's Tech for?

people forget just how good parker is, he had one, maybe 2 off years and they completely disregard a finals mvp. i guess its the nature of this league. still j hard is the man in exactly the way we need him to be... efficient. kd and green are just doing their thing.

i hope green never has 17 attempts again

@f5alcon

@Anonymous

Mullens will eventually replace Krstic as the PnP guy. I've said that for months. Patrick James also mentioned that in the pdf.

Aldrich will also replace Collison's game (minus the charges). I think Collison will stick around next season as a veteran presence on a modest contract.

Looking forward to seeing how the pieces are going to fit. For basketball fans, my buddy and I just did a quick Western Conference preview podcast, prob not as insightful as the material on here, but if you have an hour to kill, my friend tries to convince me that last year was a fluke and OKC going to miss the playoffs!!: http://usershare.net/7cflqj2a383n

i think this is proof of how important collison and krstic are

@justin
the spurs can fast break? lol. yeah out defense has been horrible this preseason if this keeps up this article will become very true and the reality will be much worse than our expectations.

@justin
parker has had good games against westbrook before as well

Another preseason game another day a team shoots nearly 50% against us.

Spurs had 22 fast break points in the first half! The Spurs!

I hope everyone else is right and the team will play better in the regular season because the preseason seems like it's been a step back for almost everything except James Harden.

@justin
haha, guess he checks in on his phone or something,lol

How concerning is Tony Parker's decimation of RW?

Thanks for reading, Brooks!

@justin
i dont think any changes were made from last year regarding the offense. kinda scary actually, wouldnt be surprised if it eventually costs brooks his job.

Harden needs to be more involved in the offense and take more shots. Green, Durant, and Westbrook are a combined 10/27 from the field.

I'm real worried about the offense still. Sounds like a lot of bad shot selection.

@justin
i think there will be more kd moving around this year but brooks is smart enough to not do it if it doesnt work.

Trackbacks

  1. [...] I defined ultimate (realistic) success back in October as this: “The Thunder wins a gritty 7-game series in the quarters, then in the Western Finals, comes up just short against the Lakers in six. It’s another huge step in the direction of winning an NBA title and though the team didn’t get there, everything we hoped for this season happened. And going into 2011-12, we have serious playoff experience under our belts and are ready to legitimately challenge for the crown.” [...]

  2. [...] season, it was all about expectations. I even made some awkward connection to movies to try and illustrate it. But last season, those were somewhat tempered expectations. Everyone [...]