Home > Commentary > Beyond 50 wins: What record is realistic for OKC this season?

Beyond 50 wins: What record is realistic for OKC this season?

Layne Murdoch/NBAE/Getty Images

Given the Thunder took the eventual champion Lakers to within one possession of a Game 7, it’s hard to point to Oklahoma City’s 50 regular-season wins in 2009-10 and say it overachieved. The 27-win improvement in one year after the franchise moved here represents such a leap that an increase this season by even half as much is unthinkable. I don’t think anyone would dispute that approaching the mid-60s in wins during the regular season is asking too much.

It begs the question: What number of regular-season wins represents the kind of improvement the Thunder is looking for? Last year, .500 seemed a realistic goal and the playoffs a hopeful one, though players said flatly in the preseason their goal was the postseason. Specifics were harder to come by this season in the Thunder’s own stated goals, but home court in the first round replaces .500 this year as most folks’ chief preseason hope, with a No. 2 seed in the West as what gets dreamed of more often than said out loud.

The last two seasons, when NBA playoff seedings were based on the same rules as this season, it took 54 (with a tiebreaker) and 53 wins to secure the No. 4 seed and home court in the West first round. Previous recent seasons, with wackier seeding rules, had No. 4 slotted teams with 54 wins (ahead of a 55-win team), 51 wins (ahead of a 52-win team) and 60 wins (behind teams with 44 and 54 wins). So 54 wins seems a reasonable number if you want at least one Game 1 at home in the playoffs.

But … the West’s No. 2 seed in the last two seasons finished with 55 and 54 wins, respectively. Only an effective one-game difference from No. 4. The previous three seasons’ No. 2 seeds needed 56, 61 and 54 wins. So hoping for one more win than what seemed reasonable for home court in the first round could mean a place in the playoff bracket designed for a collision course with the Lakers with a Finals berth on the line.

A slight slip isn't out of the question and could leave Oklahoma City on the outside of the playoffs looking in. Fans would be as wise as the team to buy into the old cliche: Just take it one game at a time.

That suggests, tempting as it is to think an eight-win improvement could be easily achieved for a team that improved by 27 the year before, the Thunder could climb rather far up the West’s power structure with only a modest jump in wins. The No. 2 team in the West doesn’t just roll out of bed with a chance to win 60 games every year.

Two factors point strongly toward the Thunder having a harder time than may be imagined pushing for a mid-50s win total: injuries and a scrappier-than-ever Western Conference. First, it’s time for an emotionless look at injuries.

The hard numbers back up plentiful offseason chatter remarking on the Thunder’s spectacular luck with health last season. I checked game-by-game, and the team opposite the Thunder was missing a starter or strong contributor off the bench due to injury, suspension or a break a whopping 38 times in 82 games. Nick Collison, James Harden and Nenad Krstic missed six games each last year for Oklahoma City, with Krstic’s half dozen scratches the lone blemishes among the Thunder’s entire starting five. There’s little chance the Thunder will enjoy 20 more games with a full roster than the opposition again.

Now, that’s a far from scientific study. For example, do you count a game when the Houston Rockets lose Luis Scola after 22 seconds, or a game when Golden State is missing Anthony Morrow? (Yes and no, respectively, for my purposes.) And it’s also worth noting, as a way to show you can throw almost any statistic out the window, that the Thunder was a mere .500 in those 38 games, so it would be hard to argue it contributed to an inflated win total for Oklahoma City. But it’s clear the Thunder were far luckier than the teams on the other side of the court last season. That won’t last.

The fact I didn’t count the Rockets or Clippers as teams playing hurt every single game, due to season-long injuries to projected starters Yao Ming and Blake Griffin, leads to the second point. Despite a concentration of power in the East, the West remains far deeper. There’s hardly a night off against a Western Conference team, so the Thunder’s West-heavy schedule will be as big a grind as ever. Yao and Griffin alone represent two huge additions, in effect, to non-playoff teams from last year with instantly realistic hopes of joining the postseason this year.

The Rockets, Clippers and Grizzlies alone seem capable of filling the nine-win gap between the Thunder’s final playoff spot last year and the Grizzlies, who finished an even 41-41. There could be 10 teams that finish with between 45 and 55 wins, and they could be fighting for six or seven playoff spots. Just as a few more wins could be the difference between No. 8 and No. 2, a few losses could be the difference between Game 1 at home and home for the postseason. The Thunder’s significant breathing room is likely to be gone.

The Thunder has plenty to suggest more wins could come. A group of young players is likely to get better. We’re 840 words in here with nary a mention of Kevin Durant. Russell Westbrook outplayed Derrick Rose for much of the FIBA World Championship. If James Harden can make a second-year leap similar to Westbrook’s last season, the Thunder could be downright explosive on the offensive end. Serge Ibaka’s development alone could determine if this is the season the Thunder are true title contenders.

But the likelihood that injury luck has run out coupled with stiffened competition in the Western Conference should give pause to anyone who thinks postseason performance alone is on what the Thunder’s season will be judged. A slight slip isn’t out of the question and could leave Oklahoma City on the outside of the playoffs looking in. Fans would be as wise as the team to buy into the old cliche: Just take it one game at a time.

Share:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • del.icio.us
  • Fark
  • StumbleUpon

Commentary

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest

yeah, i mean i am worried about the defense, and i dont think it is because ron adams is gone, something else isnt clicking right, next wednesday will be the real indicator of how the season will go

Split the San Antonio game into half weak and half good defense and you have 1 good defensive game, 1 1/2 ok and 2 1/2 weak.

This is probably the first pre-season that they have treated like a good team often treats a pre-season. It may not mean much. But it is not dialed in, chomping at the bit ready either.

@f5alcon

The thing is the defensive efficiency has gotten worse almost every game (improving against the Spurs compared to the one before). The difference from the first game to the last is over 30 points on efficiency.

@Crow
well ibaka, thabo, collison and aldrich didnt play, so no wonder our defense was bad. Green played well at SF, really after these few preseason games at SF his trade value should be up

Half the guys who played, played well on offense.

If they are emphasizing defense in camp again as job 1 then I assume Brooks is not happy.

@Crow Cool. I checked the game notes after asking and didn't see any injury listed for him.

@qrex

I assume Ibaka is just sitting but not sure.

Hayward was probably picked too high but they didn't care. They went with what they wanted.

The Johnson pick was criticized because of his high age but his age might be right from what they need now and he has had a good pre-season.

36% FG% overall, 25% from 3 pt, 50% FT%.
But it is just warm-ups.

A/TO of 1 assist to 2.25 TOs.

Henry has had a weak pre-season FWIW.

BTW, I'm pretty sure Xavier Henry will end up a better player than Aminu, Hayward and Johnson. Still can't figure out why he didn't go ahead of those other chumps.

Comparing last season to pre-season, they are giving up 4.5 %pts higher FG% inside the 3 point arc and 3 %pts beyond it. Assists allowed are a couple higher. And they are giving up as many FTAs as they get whereas last season they had a clear lead on that. But with the lineup set used shouldn't read too much into it.

Is Ibaka injured or just sitting? I trying to remember who isn't playing and why.

Oh jeez, I didn't even put those two together. That'd be a disaster. Two things though: a) this is only preseason and b) regardless of how well or how poorly we play through November, it's pretty important to remember not to overreact either way. The best offenses and defenses in November can look awfully pedestrian by the end of the year.

The perimeter defense sounds like it's not even there. Wouldn't really be concerned if the defensive problems weren't a problem the whole preseason. Hope it's not a systemic thing from losing Ron Adams.

Nick :

dream catcher :holy crap, Harden 11 points, 1-1 FG

14 points, 1-1 FG at half. I am so frustrated with him at this point. If he would just take another shot he would have 28 points by now.

well-played ;)

dream catcher :
holy crap, Harden 11 points, 1-1 FG

14 points, 1-1 FG at half. I am so frustrated with him at this point. If he would just take another shot he would have 28 points by now.

@f5alcon
Or maybe not. Again, Denver starters against Thunder subs.

@justin
or just a good bet on the over

Sammy :Alright guys, fun as this is, I’ma go watch the Utah / Lakers game cause that’s what’s on tv.

Way ahead of ya :P

The Denver over/under wins is 43.5. That's nuts. They must think Carmelo is gone.

Ely didn't play in the association last season. I think he went overseas for at least awhile.

I assumer Green was on Carmelo for most of the time he was in at the same time.

I don't know how much Presti and Brooks have studied the dribble-drive offense (that Calipari used at Univ. of Memphis) nor how close what they run is to that but clearly picking Westbrook, Harden, Durant, Green with your 4 top draft picks and them being your 4 leading drivers is not just a coincidence.

Green having another good day offensively, but has he been guarding Carmelo?

Alright guys, fun as this is, I'ma go watch the Utah / Lakers game cause that's what's on tv.

Whoa I didn't even know Melvin Ely was still in the NBA. I used to always want the Sonics to get him.

Most lineups used more than 50 minutes last season had at least 3 of the 4 main drivers (Westbrook, Harden, Durant, Green) on the court. When Maynor plays that tends not to be the case. Green has only gotten half the FTAs per minute of Westbrook and Harden.

I think Nene has figured out he has DJ White or Jeff Green guarding him.

@Sammy

Did you see DJ White Missed 23 foot 3 Point Jump Shot?

Ivey Turnaround Jump Shot: Made (4 PTS)

I hate preseason.

@justin
Really surprising that they're scoring this well. Denver must've brought their usual defensive effort.

This unit really struggling with Carmelo / Nene / Billups. But surprisingly keeping pace offensively.

holy crap, Harden 11 points, 1-1 FG

@Sammy

It was really good in his rookie year too. He's been finishing better and obviously shooting better also.

Harden's DrawF% was higher than Durant's last year.

@justin
Harden's FTA:FGA ratio has been ridiculous, going all the way back to summer league.

justin :
Harden 9 points on 1 FGA.

that is a lot, he is going to be so good this year. i think he is 3rd part of core

Going to the line again...

justin :
Harden 9 points on 1 FGA.

START HIM.

Harden 9 points on 1 FGA.

Balkman has the athleticism and age advantages.

Peterson on Balkman is not bad on size.

JR Smith sure isn't shy about shooting.

@justin

I don't know how much they have moved or would move the line to adjust for the sides on betting action purchased from their baseline research estimate. I don't think all the over/unders are pure and simple the research estimate.

@justin
brooks has had some crazy lineups this preseason

LOL Morris Peterson in at POWER FORWARD. Ivey / Cook / Harden / Peterson / White. Should be fun.