Home > Bolts > Monday Bolts – 8.30.10

Monday Bolts – 8.30.10

We all might think basketball is really important, but take a step back if you can and have a look at this. One Thunder fan is riding 140 miles via bicycle from Tulsa to OKC to raise money for multiple sclerosis. Anything donated goes 100 percent to MS research and on top of that, American Airlines has agreed to match any contributions. Joseph said he plans on wearing a KD jersey or maybe even a DT-Shirt with something clever printed on it. So if you’ve got ideas, share away. Or if you’ve got the ability, maybe drop a dollar or two Joseph’s way as well.

I already linked it with my international basketball thing Friday, but Rob Mahoney of Hardwood Paroxysm wrote a darn near poetic piece on the Thunder: “Of course, Durant is but one reason why the Thunder have captivated NBA audiences. They’re young and new, and like it or not, hip. They’re athletic and dynamic, from Russell Westbrook’s jams to Serge Ibaka’s swats. Their success is somehow bizarre, improbable, and yet all part of the plan. They’re 50-win underdogs, tightly knit with an old-school, one-goal fabric, but envisioned with modern basketball sensibilities. There is, really and truly, nothing quite like the Thunder.”

Henry Abbott has 10 things to watch in the World games: “The kick-off of Kevin Durant’s MVP campaign: Kevin Durant won the offseason with a hassle-free contract renewal, undying loyalty to his teammates and fantastic play on the international team in warm-ups to this tournament. Now the scoring-challenged American team will look for him to be as dominant with the ball as ever. Paul Pierce once dominated the ball on an undermanned Team USA squad — at the 2002 World Championships — and the team came in a dismal sixth. If Durant takes over a similarly undermanned Team U.S.A. and wins the Worlds, Durant will waltz into the NBA season with his MVP candidacy stronger than ever.”

The Thunder finished second in ESPN’s team of the decade voting. Chris Sheridan said this: “It comes back to Kevin Durant, my pick for player of the decade, and what a special talent he is. The Thunder have also surrounded him with solid, young, complementary pieces that have only begun to scratch the surface of what they are capable of (especially Russell Westbrook and Serge Ibaka; I am not as sold on Jeff Green), and they have a great coach who is still young enough to relate to such a young team. If the core sticks together, the sky is the limit — especially over the last five years of the decade.”

Chris Broussard ranks OKC fifth in the league but has some strong words about the Thunder’s new draft pick: “The Thunder like their first-round draft pick, Cole Aldrich, believing he can become something akin to Kendrick Perkins. We don’t agree; Aldrich is very likely to be a stiff. But that still won’t halt the Thunder’s rise. We like the addition of Daequan Cook a bit more. Though he took a major step back last season, Cook is a legit 3-point threat who should strengthen OKC’s bench. Ditto for Morris Peterson.”

Pete Thamel of the New York Times on KD and Team USA: “The projections were correct. This team will go as far as Durant carries it, with Derrick Rose as a capable copilot. Durant has shown confidence in shooting early, and shone against Slovenia by creating offense from defense. The Americans had five first-quarter dunks, some thanks to turnovers and transition.”

John Rohde says it’s hard to know what we’ve learned so far in Turkey with Russ and KD: “When evaluating Kevin Durant and Russell Westbrook at the FIBA World Championship in Turkey, it’s difficult to say exactly what we’ve learned after two games. Durant is very good. Westbrook is very athletic. Both of which we already knew.”

SLAM on KD: “Kevin Durant’s personality looks like it has become a defining factor on this team. He passed the ball well, made plays and shot the ball whenever he was in position to take the best shot for the team. Sure enough, the rest of the team seems to be making the extra pass and looking for the best possible shot for the team on each possession. When you’re best player is as unselfish as Durant, it helps to peer pressure everybody else into doing the same thing.”

Want to dislike the Blazers some today? Have a glance at all the comments on Blazers Edge breaking down Thunder v. Blazers. Summary: They have Greg Oden which therefore makes them better.

Our Daily Thunder t-shirt contest ends next Monday so hustle up and travel somewhere and take some pictures. Send anything in to dailythunder@gmail.com.

Share:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • del.icio.us
  • Fark
  • StumbleUpon

Bolts

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest

blazer fans bitter enough?

If I were a Blazer's fan I would be pretty uncomfortable too, until recently many of them probably believed they were the next big kid on the NBA block. They might be still, but they now know we're even bigger.

Ibaka is our best hope for a low post scorer. He showed some glimpses last year and showed even a little more in his limited summer league. He has soft touch and a nice shot.

@Joe
Didn't Kristic have an injury for like 5 games last season? If so I'm sure that's where most of the minutes for that data is coming from.

And I do agree with you about the P&R with Aldrich, but only to an extent. I don't think he'll be an "outstanding PNR" but I think he has a chance to have a couple of plays drawn up for him where he rolls to the basket.

justin :
I’d feel much more comfortable with Aldrich subbed for Krstic if James Harden were also starting.

I probably already feel more comfortable with Alrich rather than Kristic, but I totally agree that I would feel much much more comfortable with Harden in there as well.

@Joe

Maybe. I don't think he has the vertical to be a Chandler type PnR option.

@Jax Raging Bile Duct
I agree that Aldrich won't be a PNP option early in his career, but I think he could be an outstanding PNR player as the roller going to the basket. He has an amazingly long wingspan and he's athletic, he could really go up and grab that ball on the run and flush it home.

@justin
I think you'd be wrong to dismiss the data out of hand. It's 200 minutes, but if you consider that a unit may only play 25 minutes together a night if they were all starters, that would be like 8 games worth. Plus, if KD, Green, RW and TS were all in, it likely was not against scrubs or subs.

Regarding Aldrich vs Krstic; I think you can run offensive plays for Krstic. Nenad can shoot that midrange jumper pretty well; he's a good PnP option. I really doubt you can run an offensive play for Cole, but you know, that's still an unknown really. Cole is a rookie and we don't know what he can do yet. But from what I saw in college, they ran a few plays for him on the low block, but they focused their offense elsewhere.

The think that Cole has going for him is his solid footwork. IMO, any big man with good footwork can learn a decent postgame since the footwork is the hardest part. His postgame in college was elementary, but solid. And his midrange game is something you try to stay away from. He's got that long windup and awkward release point.

Aldrich will get his points off of offensive rebounds and an occasional dish from a cutting guard. His outlet passes will put smiles on all our faces, and he'll rebound both ends of the floor really well. Krstic will usually block out his man, and sometimes he'll get the rebound. Aldrich will just get the rebound. Cole is really wide too, and that will come in handy setting screens.

I just don't see Cole as a PnP option, and I don't think he has the vertical to be a Chandler type PnR option. A post game is all he has left, and he may develop that since he does have good footwork, but I'm not holding my breath.

I'd feel much more comfortable with Aldrich subbed for Krstic if James Harden were also starting.

@Joe

What's the sample size for that lineup? 150 minutes? Probably most of them against backups.

Plus, during the playoffs, our OR jumped to over 120 with a DR of 75 with Nick in the middle with the starters; with Krstic in the middle and the starters it fell to an OR of 90 and a DR of 112.....Turrrrible.

@justin
I think that is a great point.

I never wanted us to have a shooter at the five in the first place, but since we do, we are set up for it.

However, how different will it be for us when Aldrich is in when you consider his offensive game will be similar to Collisons?

Our offense flowed beautifully when Collison was in instead of Krstic.....how do you explain that?

During the season our offensive rating with the starting five was 108 and change and defensively 103. You sub out Krsic for Collison and our offensive rating goes up to 112 and the defense stays the same. So, in light of the fact that Aldrich's offensive game is much much more similar to Nick's than Krstic's, how is it fair to say that our offense would suffer with Aldrich in instead of Krstic??

I see your point, I just don't agree.

@Joe

I think if you swapped Krstic for Aldrich in our lineup as is our offense would be worse. That's one less perimeter threat, we're left basically with Kevin Durant as our only reliable shooter from further than 18 feet. Maybe Aldrich will be a great finisher in the NBA, but I don't think he'll be good enough to make up for losing one of our starting lineup's only perimeter threats.

Aldrich will have to be set up near the basket just like Krstic has to be set up on the perimeter. If our offense changes and gets a little more coherent maybe we'll run plays with him, have him cut to the basket, or something. The way it is now though I think it'll be more difficult to utilize Aldrich as an offensive weapon than Krstic.

I hope Aldrich is Kevin Love-esque...

justin :@Greg

The only thing I see Aldrich potentially being a big upgrade offensively is as a screen setter, and maybe as a PnR guy with Russ.

Have you forgotten Krstic's innate ability to botch multiple putbacks and easy buckets every game?

@justin
I'll say it. I think Aldrich will be a more EFFICIENT offensive player than Krstic. He won't be more versatile, he won't be more polished or gifted, but Aldrich does what he does very well, which is put the ball in the hoop when he's close to it. He doesn't try to do what he doesn't do well; unlike Krstic. Krstic is a decent midrange shooter, not great just decent; yet he shoots them a lot, whether that is by design from the coaching staff or not, it is the case. Dude has helped us, but he has almost shot us out of games as well.

You won't see Aldrich taking those shots. He had a Offensive rating of 117 at Kansas; one of the highest in the nation; and a 60% TS percentage.

So, the question has nuance. Is Krstic a better offensive player because he shoots more and shoots decently, or is Aldrich better because he shoots less, but shoots better? It's not black and white.

Tunisia making a huge comeback on Iran... and they show KD in the stand enjoying the scene. Soaking it in. I don't suppose he gets to be a fan that often!

@Greg

Krstic is a big part of the offense when he's in, even if he's not scoring. He's Westbrook's safety valve pretty much with the PnP. We're already great on the offensive boards, and that's one aspect where Krstic wasn't that bad. He was better than Kendrick Perkins and Chris Kaman in ORB% and within less than a percentage point of Brook Lopez, Andrew Bynum, Marc Gasol, Shaq, and Al Horford. Equal to Andris Biedrins. Krstic sucks at defensive rebounding.

The only thing I see Aldrich potentially being a big upgrade offensively is as a screen setter, and maybe as a PnR guy with Russ.

The worst thing Kahn did was submarine Jefferson's trade value at every opportunity it seemed. If he would have kept his mouth closed they probably could have gotten more for him...

justin :@Greg

You think Alrich is a better player offensively than Krstic?

I never said that. Aldrich could enable our offense to be more efficient, better spacing (most teams don't want their center roaming around the perimeter - ala Krstic), and as I said earlier he is a better finisher. Not to mention Aldrich is better on the offensive glass, creating more possessions.

@Andrewonipod
He did some crazy stuff, but I think he succeeded in improving the team. Ridnour will be better in that system than Sessions, Webster is very versatile, and better than people give him credit for. People dump all over him for the Darko deal, but in reality, it's a damn good deal if he can be even serviceable, like he was for them last year. Beasley is very low risk, yet potentially high reward addition. Flynn has a full year in the NBA under his belt, but if he continues to suck, they can go with Ridnour for a year or two until Rubio comes over. Love is a double-double machine, Tolliver is a damn good scorer and can play three positions, and Pekovic is a freaking beast.

@justin
I think I agree with you. Presti drafted Aldrich to be a Kevin Love type player, just in the defensive mold instead of the offensive. Aldrich will rebound and pass well. Maybe he really things Mullens is on the right track?

@vega Kahn drafted w Johnson and traded for martell Webster and Beasley all in one summer. U never no what he will do....

@justin
No way Minnesota would have done that anyway.

Pleiss and Germany are getting demolished by Australia.

The opportunity to acquire Love was early in the year when him and Jefferson were having trouble co-existing. Many here balked at even a Jeff Green for Kevin Love swap, which looks real silly in retrospect. No way Minny trades him now or lets him get away as an RFA...

@KingGondo

He'll be RFA...

And this is way premature, but Love is the type of player we could realistically lure to OKC in free agency, as well (although we all know how averse to free agency Presti generally is).

@Greg

You think Alrich is a better player offensively than Krstic?

@Andrewonipod
Well, lets be fair. When Oden is healthy, he's a pretty darn good big man. But, given the choice I'd take Aldrich and have him play a whole season (assuming, of course, that he does) rather than take Oden for a small part of a season.

Basically, let's see what each does this season and then decide.

@Elegy444
Nevermind, just saw 1:30 on ESPN. For some reason I thought it was 11:30.

I wouldn't trade Aldrich for oden. I still cant believe how much Oden koolaid the blazers fans are drinking. If they want to list reasons why they are better than us oden should definitely be the last one.

Cox OKC, anyone know where the game is???

@Dr. Rumble
I just hope he can be more of a scorer in the pros. It's interesting because he was an efficient scorer in college, and had both good touch and range (for a center). He seemed to have been de-emphasize pretty heavily last year, which is odd.

I would LOVE to have LOVE on the Thunder. He has been very impressive in the FIBA tourney.

justin :
Aldrich is nice but he won’t help us much on offense which is where we need it most. I hope Brooks and the coaching staff are watching the worlds and getting ideas on how to make the offense work better.

Aldrich may not be the most efficient big man, but he's better than Krstic at finishing, passing, and on the offensive glass. I agree with your last point, but I don't see how Aldrich won't help us any on offense.

If you like outlet passes then you should love Aldrich. Who knows how he will be in the pros but in college his outlets were second to none. He had the outlet pass to Collins down to an art.

I know this has been said before but I think it's worth repeating. Seeing Kevin Love throw his outlet passes makes me really wish we had him.

Aldrich is nice but he won't help us much on offense which is where we need it most. I hope Brooks and the coaching staff are watching the worlds and getting ideas on how to make the offense work better.

The Blazers fans do make one good point, albeit in a silly way. The Thunder are still a major piece (big man) away from being contenders, while the Blazers at least have those pieces (though it seems they'll never all be healthy at once). The Oden argument is extremely weak in itself because Oden is Oden, but the fact that our frontcourt is softer or more one-dimensional than LaMarcus Aldridge is a legitimate concern.

Maybe Aldrich grabs boards like mad, which would help, but we still need someone who can create his own points when the perimeter is defended well.

Those poor Blazers fans! Their two best players, Roy and Oden, look like they'll always be hampered by their multiple knee surgeries, and their third best player, Aldridge, just doesn't have the personality to be a winner (if he did have the personality he would be playing in Turkey next to KD).

And they're hampering their young talent by starting two NBA fossils. When Camby and Miller decline it's going to be a fall off a cliff.

If Aldrich can be similar on the boards to Kevin Love I will be happy. He doesn't have Love's offensive skills but I don't care about that. If he can give the team a nose for the ball similarly to what Love has shown on Team USA that will help this team out tremendously.

We know Blazers had Bowie but they were not better than Bulls.
I think KD is famous enough.But more and more people know Russ as an amazing dunk man.

I am absolutely loving the worlds. what a blast. KD and RW are playing great. Hopefully Scotty prohibts them from playing ball during the 2 weeks between the worlds & the start of training camp. they'll need a break!