Home > Commentary > What drafting Cole Aldrich means

What drafting Cole Aldrich means

It may have not been a giant splash in the NBA universe when the Thunder traded their #21 and #26 picks to the Hornets for #11 pick Cole Aldrich and Morris Peterson’s $6.2 million dollar contract, but the ramifications of that maneuver revealed very interesting and very significant things about where the Thunder are at in the franchise’s young history and where they intend to go from here.

So let’s have a look at just what that maneuver means for the Thunder franchise:

1. The Thunder will not be players in free agency

All that cap space that so many people have been either complaining about (not using it) or raving about (we’re getting Bosh! we’re getting Bosh!!!!) regarding how to run a team and what the team will do in free agency and who they will go after.

Gone.

From Daequan Cook to Mo Peterson to the 11th overall pick in Cole Aldrich, that projected $15 million dollars in cap space has been widdled all the way down to about $6.6 million ($5.6 million if they re-sign Kyle Weaver) which is enough to sign a Mid-level type of talent but definitely not enough to make any kind of neon-lights signing.

Which the Thunder were really never in the running to make in the first place despite however many individuals pined after or hoped for Chris Bosh or David Lee to make their way to OKC. That scenario never resonated with Presti’s mantra and I’m sure most free agents never really viewed OKC as that undeniable dream landing spot for an elite NBA free agent.

Whatever. Their loss, right?

2. The Thunder are more interested in immediate contributors than high lottery “projects”

Cole Aldrich is not about upside. Does he have one? Sure. Is his ceiling very far above his current abilities as a player? Absolutely not.

Aldrich does many things well and should continue to do those things at the next level since they are three of the things that translate best from the NCAA to the NBA (those things being rebounding, blocking shots and player efficiency, which includes offensive efficiency—yes, you read that last one correctly. It’s okay to be surprised. Lord knows I was).

But Aldrich is not a Byron Mullens type of player whose athleticism and relative lack of polish lends one to hope that, if given time and proper guidance, this raw prospect could develop into an entirely different/far superior player.

Best example? Aldrich holds the ball very high when he receives an entry pass and continues to keep it high if he grabs an offensive rebound, typically going straight back up with the tip or shot instead of endlessly pump-faking despite the opportunity for a good look being there initially. In essence, he already possesses traits that you want raw projects to learn during their development from great upside to realized ability. Toss on the fact that Aldrich has only above average athleticism and not some all-world, Dwight Howardian athleticism, and Aldrich should continue to improve at a steady pace instead of in leaps and bounds.

Aldrich’s attributes are the indications of a polished player, one who can certainly improve and become better but not someone who is raw and teeming with upside because of their lack of experience with the game or the fundamentals that oh so often go out the window with elite athleticism.

Why is this a big deal?

Because Mullens is an upside guy who was taken a year ago. Ibaka was an upside guy taken two years ago.

Aldrich is an immediate contributor who was taken 4 days ago. As Royce said, “Next is now.”

3. As he’s stated many, many times, Sam Presti prefers sustained team stability than huge overhauls or risky transactions

Sooner or later, we’re all going to get with the program and understand that Presti is not going to make any drastic alterations or blockbuster type moves that will shake-up the entire complexion and outlook of the Thunder organization.

Say it with me, “Sustained. Success. Sustained. Stability.”

Please remind me of what I just wrote when I continue hearing about Al Jefferson and Derrick Favors trade rumors. I will forget and start hoping/expecting something Presti is never going to even consider.

4. Cole Aldrich is expected to make an impact this season

You don’t move up from the 21st and 26th pick into the lottery for a polished, non-upside player at #11 if you’re just going to stash him in the D-League or sit him at the end of your bench.

A project with huge upside? Sure.

But not an NBA-ready player who fills a need within your organization. Make no mistake, Cole Aldrich was both a need and a “contribute now” selection for the Thunder.

A safe need and “contribute now” pick, for sure, but one who is expected to make an impact immediately nonetheless.

Here’s a look at what kind of impact he can make this year:

Cole Aldrich led ALL 2010 Draft prospect centers in defensive rebounds per 40 Minutes Pace Adjusted, ranking #1 at 9.7 defensive boards. On the other end, despite Kansas’ talented squad of offensive weapons and the subsequent efficient offense and shooting %, Aldrich still managed to rank #3 in offensive rebounds per 40MPA for centers drafted in the first round at 4.4 boards (behind Demarcus Cousins and Kevin Seraphin).

Cole Aldrich ranked third for all 2010 Draft prospect centers in blocked shots per 40 MPA at 5 blocks.

Cole Aldrich was tied for third lowest turnovers  per 40 MPA at 2.2 giveways. Accordingly, Aldrich had the 8th best Assist-to-Turnover ratio in the center draft class despite playing in a role that fairly limited his usage as a passer (mainly outlet passes), which means that A) Aldrich is fine playing within his role and maximizing his strengths while minimizing his weaknesses and B) Cole is very efficient as a distributor, especially for a team that likes to run in a transition game after a missed basket or a defensive stop. Hmmm, who do we know who fits that type of play style…

Only Greg Monroe and Cole Aldrich ranked in the bottom half for fouls committed out of the 2010 center draft class for players who were drafted in the first round, which is one of the only statistics you really want to be rated towards the bottom in. This makes them the least foul prone elite bigs in the draft.

Cole Aldrich ranks in the Top 5 in Player Efficiency Rating (ranks #2 in PER out of centers taken in the first round, behind only DeMarcus Cousins) in terms of how much impact a single player has for his team on a per game basis. This is fairly surprising as Kansas’ depth and overall talent level, not to mention Aldrich’s limited role on offense, would have undoubtedly been a detractor for Aldrich’s PER rating. Yet, the fact that he ranks this high would indicate that even in a fairly limited role, Aldrich performs well above average in terms of efficiency and overall impact.

This is even further supported when one looks at Aldrich’s True Shooting % among all 2010 Draft centers. Cole Aldrich ranks #1 in first round centers at 61%, which is an above average score for a statistic that is very important and telling for centers in terms of how efficient they are at getting good looks at the rim and then how well they convert those looks.

What makes Aldrich’s TS% so revealing about his offensive efficiency is due to the fact that Aldrich only scored 16.6 points per 40 MPA during the last year because of his limited offensive role. Aldrich will never be a #1 offensive option or a player who pours in points out of the paint, but based off of every relevant offensive statistic, Aldrich can be an incredibly efficient offensive player both in the paint/at the rim and a guy who can get you double digit scoring numbers in a rather limited role in the offensive system.

So what kind of impact will Aldrich make?

Got me. For each of Aldrich’s rather impressive strengths he does have weaknesses (like most players) that bring up questions about how effective he could be for the Thunder or if he is just a longer, slightly more athletic and better passing Nick Collison, with the standing reach, mobility and court awareness to man the center position for a team in desperate need of a rebounding, shot-blocking, highly efficient low-post scorer. In essence, Aldrich could simply be a stop-gap to stem the tide of opposing teams’ offensive rebounds and easy buckets at the rim instead of that low post threat on both ends that would complete this young roster for the next decade.

Like I said, I don’t know. But what I do know is that by drafting Cole Aldrich, the Thunder have officially signaled the rest of the league that the rebuilding effort is over and done with.

It’s competing for a championship mode. And by maneuvering to get that 11th pick, Sam Presti and Co. sent out a flare that signaled full speed ahead.

When’s the season start again?

Share:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • del.icio.us
  • Fark
  • StumbleUpon

Commentary

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest

@Bryan

doubtful....he'll likely stay in Boston or sign somewhere with one of the big name guys.

Sooooo.... No Ray Allen? :(

I don't think he gets out of the 6-7 rebounds per game range and I've pretty much accepted where he is on that as being where he will be. You'd want more but I don't think there is any reason to expect it.

If Green gets to a neutral Adjusted +/-, PER 17, and 55+ TS%, that would be a great improvement and fulfillment of his high pick and time investment.

There is no way Presti is making a move for Gortat, or anyone like that. We don't need to add rotation players at this point. If anyone of significance gets moved it will be either Krstic or Collison, and they will be traded for some combination of bad contracts and picks.

@Keith
But giving good high fives takes great practice and timing.
I think the token Veteran thing as a whole can be very over rated. However having guys who wont become overawed by big moments is critical. plus if we have a ten man rotation, 2 rookies in the d league that leaves 3 guys in a mostly never play type role

Keith :@jdstormMullens also has three point range, something Krstic lacks. If he can shoot over 40% from 3 in the NBA, without being completely clueless on defense, I’d give him Krstic’s spot right away.

If Mullens ever shoots over 40% from three in the NBA I'll buy justin his Knicks/Green dress.

@jdstorm
Mullens also has three point range, something Krstic lacks. If he can shoot over 40% from 3 in the NBA, without being completely clueless on defense, I'd give him Krstic's spot right away.

@DizzyDai
The problem is that 1) Krstic isn't a very good jump shooter and 2) our team rarely takes advantage of that space. The point of bringing out a center to shoot is to open the lane. Durant converts like a golden god inside, but his handle and outside threat have him taking 75% of his shots outside the basket. Westbrook is poor at converting, and everyone else is in love with the jump shot. I understand the point of his role, but we don't implement the advantage it is meant to bring. This is exactly why we've all been looking for an inside scorer, someone to take pressure off our perimeter-oriented players.

@jdstorm

Exactly. If Mullens improves at all, I feel Krstic will be bench and Mullens will take his role.

I think this debate might be pointless soon if all the work Mullens says he is putting in starts to pay off. If BJ develops into a solid rotation C doesn't he take over the C who Shoots role?

I'm really curious to see Mullens play... I mean he does have all the physical attributes and good athleticism. I hope he had the drive and work ethic to do something with it.

@jdstorm
I'm not sure how much that swap helps. Z took more of his shots on jumpers than Krstic, and converted at an even lower percentage. Worse, he's extremely slow at this point. With the way our defensive scheme has guys switching and showing on every pick, Z would get carved up every night. The veteran presence is rather overrated when the guy isn't really helping the team.

@Keith

I agree that Krstic's role isn't anything extraordinary, but his shooting does help spread out some of the defense.

Krstic is fine for center depth if that's what we're going to use him for but I don't think he'll be glad with that arrangement.

@Keith
the more i thought about the gortat idea, the more i dislike it.

For a new simmilar idea. if Lebron Leaves what do you think about swapping Kristic for Z at a reasonable price.

Z would give us a solid vet who has been to the finals before. he could fill the Etan thomas Bench warmer role. Or Play around 20 mins every other night with mullens and aldrich fighting to fill those minutes full time.

@justin
This was a good year for Camby, true. But I don't really like using our starting center as a mid range shooter in the first place. I'm just saying, what Krstic does offensively isn't special. Using it as his primary role hurts the team more than it helps.

Keith :@justinCamby is a better jump shooter than Krstic.

I dunno about that. Camby had a good year this year, though.

I just think it's interesting. I hope Aldrich can play like Camby too.

@justin
Camby is a better jump shooter than Krstic.

@Lefty
I think Green will be better (read: have a more positive impact) playing less PF, but I don't suspect any numerical increase in his box score. Fact is, he's going to be 24 (not actually young anymore by Bball standards), and this is probably the player he is. Also, given he should lose a large number of minutes at the 4, I can't imagine he makes up enough of those minutes at the 3 to increase his stats (even if he is playing better). Green probably plays fewer minutes next year, so an efficiency increase would likely only get him back to average.

@jdstorm
Gortat and Ibaka are a very offensively challenged frontcourt. If we get Gortat (who didn't play well last year), he would likely be paired primarily with Green. Ibaka-Aldrich actually looks like a very positive pair since Aldrich is a good passer, smart player, and true center, allowing Ibaka to do more roaming and lessen the impact of Ibaka's stone-handedness and ball-stopping.

I forgot about the very likely decrease of Green's playing time. So 17 and 9 won't be happening. Not that I really expected it to.

As long as Green stops settling for jumpshot and starts driving hard, drawing fouls, and collecting rebounds I'll be happy.

Aldrich shoots like Camby.

I don't like Gortat's contract nor do I see what he adds to our team now that we've drafted Aldrich.

Gortat is set to make $28.1M/4Y

Aldrich will make around $9.8M/4Y

Please ignore my last Comment i just looked at Gortat's contract. Hopefully we can keep Kristic around for 2 more years, or until one of mullens or Pleis develops into a better version

If i was Presti, Id work out Long term extensions for both green and Durant as soon as possible. Then look to trade Kristic and some of our fringe roster guys like weaver, or DJ, to Orlando for Gortat, assuming his salary isn't to restrictive. I haven't checked the length of that deal for a while. Though this would probably mean that collison doesn't get the extension he was hoping for.

With His future sorted for the next 3-5 years, jeff would be happy to become the super 6th man type player he can be.

OUR Starting Unit/rotation looks like this.
PG Westbrook SG Thabo SF Durant PF Ibaka C Gortat
PG Maynor SG Harden F Green C Aldrich

@justin
With pics to prove it!

I expect Green to have a better year, but mostly because I expect him to be playing a little less 4. Now that we have more size down low, we can let Ibaka/Collison play the 4, and Durant can get more rest, allowing Green to play more 3. This is what we want, right? I'm not ready to give a numerical value to his increase (mostly because I'm not sure it will be a lot), but I expect something.

@AC@J.G
.
Don't overlook Aldrich's offense so quickly. This is a guy who can shoot, a guy with a soft touch. I think the loss of Krstic had a great deal more to do with his size (the only true center on the roster at the time, Mullens excluded) than his jump shot. Aldrich could easily replicate what Krstic gives in the pick and pop. But while we're on the subject, we should probably be running less pick and pop (low percentage even at the best of times) and more pick and roll. We already settle for waaaay too many bad shots on offense, I hate that we've built one player's role upon his ability to get more long mid-range shots.

@justin

If Green loses PT to Ibaka (too optimistic?), I'm expecting something between 12/4 and 13/5

@DizzyDai

If Green averages 17 and 9 next year for us I will attend the Thunder-
Knicks road game in a dress.

justin :I’d be interested to see what the general sentiment here will be if Jeff Green is mediocre again this year. In the time I’ve been commenting on this site I’ve seen the general consensus go from “20-10 possibility” to, “er.. maybe 20-8″, to “super sixth man”.

I'd be thrilled with 17 and 9 with more consistent shooting from outside (but less attempts).

@AC
Excellent point. Krstic certainly has value when his shot is falling and his offense/pick and pop ability helps give the Thunder roster some flexibility and forces the defense to account for another in-game situation.

Of course the downside of Krstic's value is that if his shot is not falling, how much does he really contribute to the team? I think that's why we'll see Krstic on a much shorter leash this year but we will certainly see him barring some unforeseen move.

Of the lottery picks from 2009 only 5 of the 14 started more than half of their games as rookies.

Of the 2008 lottery picks only 6 of 14 started more than half of their games.

To the people talking of trading Kristic. It is way premature. On worse teams most of these guys weren't starting. Depth is important and we have no idea how fast Aldrich will pick up our defense and our "offense". I will always remember how quickly we slipped when Kristic was out of our line up at the end of the regular season. Easily he is the most undervalued player on our team.

I'd be interested to see what the general sentiment here will be if Jeff Green is mediocre again this year. In the time I've been commenting on this site I've seen the general consensus go from "20-10 possibility" to, "er.. maybe 20-8", to "super sixth man".

@Mark!

I feel we are patient with Green, but not too overly optimistic either.

Concerning Krstic's role again: I do see Mullens eventually becoming OKC's pick and pop replacement once Krstic's contract expires.

@The DON

It's probably a better pairing. I'm sure Aldrich will help. I just don't see Green suddenly developing into some monster playing next to Aldrich.

I'll be happy to eat crow if I'm wrong, but I think a lot of people are going to saying "Wait and see, Green will come around" next off-season too.

Peter :@dream catcherlike your lineup idea, with the exception of kristic’s role. honestly, i would make him the etan thomas of this year. rather, i would have him keep the seat warm for Aldrich, and when he’s ready to contribut big minutes, I’d have nenad ride the pine the rest of the way.

As much as I hate to admit it, Krstic has a role on this team. His pick and pop helped carry a couple of games last year. Until Collison can prove he can score like Nenad, I'd prefer Krstic to be the first off the bench. But whenever Nenad starts missing shots or boards he should be sub'd for Collison immediately.

The same could be said for Sefolosha or Green. When playing the 2 or 3 if Thabo or Jeff can not knock down open shots, I'd insert Cook. If Cook fails to produce, insert Peterson.

Zeiram :I continue to be baffled by Presti. I started sometime when Pritarch was considered all the rage when I noticed that Presti didn´t make flashy moves but nice, solid longterm improvement. I love the way he builds the franchise. Let the young guys grow together and improve from within. The Blazers lost their path when they started to go after FAs. Getting Miller and not trusting the young pgs was a wrong move. Presti showed how its done by trusting his young players. OKC has every player type you need to win the championship. The franchise scorer/clutch player, the athletic pg who defends well, a stretch/finesse 4, some bangers, an athletic defensive C, a defense stopper, a sixth man. All they missed was a rebounding C and a shooter and they got that too now. Now they just need to grow together and show what they can do.

I agree completely. That is why I've never been interested in picking up Bosh or Lee. Presti is sticking to the master plan and everything is working out beautifully.

I continue to be baffled by Presti. I started sometime when Pritarch was considered all the rage when I noticed that Presti didn´t make flashy moves but nice, solid longterm improvement. I love the way he builds the franchise. Let the young guys grow together and improve from within. The Blazers lost their path when they started to go after FAs. Getting Miller and not trusting the young pgs was a wrong move. Presti showed how its done by trusting his young players. OKC has every player type you need to win the championship. The franchise scorer/clutch player, the athletic pg who defends well, a stretch/finesse 4, some bangers, an athletic defensive C, a defense stopper, a sixth man. All they missed was a rebounding C and a shooter and they got that too now. Now they just need to grow together and show what they can do.

Joe :
Nick is a special case. He’s not a Presti pickup, but he was signed to his extension by Bennett’s decision when the sale of the team was in transition. Nick is a worker and a fan favorite and he has some value in the league. But he also has value to the Thunder.
My guess is that as a courtesy to Nick, being the pro that he is and the class act that Presti is, there would be a conversation where Presti asks Nick what he wants to do going forward. Does he want to finish his career in OKC most likely as a backup at a reduced salary? Or does he want to be traded at the deadline to a team that needs him to bang in the playoffs?

Unless something catastrophic happens and the Thunder are clearly out of the playoff picture by the trade deadline, I don't see any reason why the team wouldn't keep Nick. I'm all for resigning him as well, as long as the price is reasonable.

Another thing, re: David Lee. Even if he signs somewhere for <$12m/y, that doesn't necessarily mean he would have signed in OKC for that amount...

@william
Actually, I would trade Krstic and White but keep Collison. He is valuable to us.

keep pairing #4 ,#5 Ibaka/Aldrid both of them are ridiculus shot blocker and rebounder aswell .

for me ..presti should be trade Collinson $6,750,000 and Kristic $5,543,116..... for 2 future first round of 2011 or 2012 .he can save money $12mil for extend Green and Durant. we have Aldrid and Ibaka for cover both of Kristic and Collinson now....and we still have 2 pick of 2011 and 2 pick of 2012 it very good for OKC future.....and Wave weaver and patterson

can somebody plz tell me about the detials of the deal with clippers and us?

@The DON
i agree its a better lineup defensively down low, but it doesnt create as much scoring without krstics pick and pop, unless green gets agressive off of aldrich screens

@Mark!
Two totally different players. Shard is a shooter, whereas Green is more of a slasher.

@Mark!

But is aldrich/green better than kristic/green? I say yes, meaning it's an upgrade over what we were working with last year. Though that's not saying much, because the green/kristic combination was a tragedy of biblical proportions.

@Peter

I can't imagine Green/Aldrich being a better pairing than Lewis/Howard and I've never liked that lineup either.

Now, am I alone in thinking that Green playing alongside someone like Aldrich will make him a better player? I can't help but think that having someone willing to fight for 10-12 boards a game, and block 2-4 shots on D will help cover up some of Green's deficiencies, and allow him to concentrate on what he's really good at - driving to the hole. I think Green can be the starting PF for a title team - remember, he only gets about 20 min per game at the 4; the rest of the time he's backing up KD. And the bulk of those came alongside Nenad; imagine him playing mostly by Aldrich. Can't help but think this will help Green, allowing him to make up for whatever we lose on offense w/out Nenad.

also, i think there's gonna be 10 min a game at the 2 & 3, depending on the lineup, for cook. here's hoping that he can really stretch the floor, play athletic D, and hit around 40% of his 3's this year. if he can do that, and if Aldrich can offer the toughness that was so lacking with Nenad last year, then I think we're greatly improved over last year, not even taking into account the potential progress of Harden/Green/Durant/Ibaka. Also, how do we fit in Mullens? I hear he's getting closer to being able to contribute...

@dream catcher
like your lineup idea, with the exception of kristic's role. honestly, i would make him the etan thomas of this year. rather, i would have him keep the seat warm for Aldrich, and when he's ready to contribut big minutes, I'd have nenad ride the pine the rest of the way. This is what they did with etan/ibaka. Etan played mostly the first quarter of the season, but once they realized that ibaka was so far along in his development, that was all she wrote for Thomas. Nenad is in the last year of his deal, and with the drafting of Mullens/Ibaka/Tibor/Aldrich the last few years, there's just no room on the roster for Nenad next year. Sure, he may get his feelings hurt by being benched, but the Thunder gave him a 3-yr deal and over $15 mil, so it's not like he's hurtin for cash. Nenad has served his purpose; now that we have the crop of big men ready to take over that we do, it's time he rode the pine. Thanks for your services.