<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The battle for fourth: Breaking down the schedules</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dailythunder.com/2010/03/the-battle-for-fourth-breaking-down-the-schedules/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dailythunder.com/2010/03/the-battle-for-fourth-breaking-down-the-schedules/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 18:31:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: MarcUpNorth</title>
		<link>http://www.dailythunder.com/2010/03/the-battle-for-fourth-breaking-down-the-schedules/comment-page-1/#comment-65388</link>
		<dc:creator>MarcUpNorth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 17:03:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailythunder.com/?p=8672#comment-65388</guid>
		<description>@Justin

... and Prichard has done a good job as GM (PA helps make things happen) but I think Presti&#039;s team has done an even better job.  

Lots of similarities between the 2 teams, for example the &#039;family&#039; atmosphere etc(while they are still close there it seems to me that the Blazers aren&#039;t as tight as they were perceived to be... playing time etc is certainly an issue with Bayless, Miller, Rudy and some jealousy when Oden was starting to play a bigger role).  

I remember at the beginning of last year how apparently Roy and Aldridge stated how much emphasis they were going to put on becoming complete players (playing some D)... much like Durant said this year, but it seems like lip service as far as the Blazer&#039;s duo was concerned but not with KD and co. (and I think that Durant had a worse reputation than Roy as far as being a one-way player), KD seems to have really stuck to his promise to work harder on D!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Justin</p>
<p>&#8230; and Prichard has done a good job as GM (PA helps make things happen) but I think Presti&#8217;s team has done an even better job.  </p>
<p>Lots of similarities between the 2 teams, for example the &#8216;family&#8217; atmosphere etc(while they are still close there it seems to me that the Blazers aren&#8217;t as tight as they were perceived to be&#8230; playing time etc is certainly an issue with Bayless, Miller, Rudy and some jealousy when Oden was starting to play a bigger role).  </p>
<p>I remember at the beginning of last year how apparently Roy and Aldridge stated how much emphasis they were going to put on becoming complete players (playing some D)&#8230; much like Durant said this year, but it seems like lip service as far as the Blazer&#8217;s duo was concerned but not with KD and co. (and I think that Durant had a worse reputation than Roy as far as being a one-way player), KD seems to have really stuck to his promise to work harder on D!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: W.C.</title>
		<link>http://www.dailythunder.com/2010/03/the-battle-for-fourth-breaking-down-the-schedules/comment-page-1/#comment-65346</link>
		<dc:creator>W.C.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 15:22:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailythunder.com/?p=8672#comment-65346</guid>
		<description>I am gonna be greedy and say I want the 3 seed with Dallas as the two. Can I do that? The nuggs&#039; loss lstnight makes it more believable. We just have to have three less losses than them the rest of the season. I know this puts us at winning our division but it is possible.

The Nuggs have 8 games left that are atleast semi-losable, (@BOS,@ORL,@Dallas,@OKC,LAL,SA,Memphis,@PHO) and the BOS, ORL, Dallas games are the 2,4,5 games in a 5 games in 7 nights stint.

We have 7 left that would be considered not-entirely-crappy losses, (SA, @LAL, @BOS, @Dallas, @Utah, DEN, @PHO)

Improbable? maybe... It pretty much comes down to us beating denver the night after playing in Utah</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am gonna be greedy and say I want the 3 seed with Dallas as the two. Can I do that? The nuggs&#8217; loss lstnight makes it more believable. We just have to have three less losses than them the rest of the season. I know this puts us at winning our division but it is possible.</p>
<p>The Nuggs have 8 games left that are atleast semi-losable, (@BOS,@ORL,@Dallas,@OKC,LAL,SA,Memphis,@PHO) and the BOS, ORL, Dallas games are the 2,4,5 games in a 5 games in 7 nights stint.</p>
<p>We have 7 left that would be considered not-entirely-crappy losses, (SA, @LAL, @BOS, @Dallas, @Utah, DEN, @PHO)</p>
<p>Improbable? maybe&#8230; It pretty much comes down to us beating denver the night after playing in Utah</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.dailythunder.com/2010/03/the-battle-for-fourth-breaking-down-the-schedules/comment-page-1/#comment-65335</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 13:49:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailythunder.com/?p=8672#comment-65335</guid>
		<description>I would like a 4 or 5 seed, but long as we make the playoffs its a great season for me. Once you are in anything is possible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like a 4 or 5 seed, but long as we make the playoffs its a great season for me. Once you are in anything is possible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: justin</title>
		<link>http://www.dailythunder.com/2010/03/the-battle-for-fourth-breaking-down-the-schedules/comment-page-1/#comment-65334</link>
		<dc:creator>justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 13:47:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailythunder.com/?p=8672#comment-65334</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-65302&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@MarcUpNorth &lt;/a&gt; 

Blazers also have the benefit of Paul Allen&#039;s never ending check book..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-65302" rel="nofollow">@MarcUpNorth </a> </p>
<p>Blazers also have the benefit of Paul Allen&#8217;s never ending check book..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: justin</title>
		<link>http://www.dailythunder.com/2010/03/the-battle-for-fourth-breaking-down-the-schedules/comment-page-1/#comment-65333</link>
		<dc:creator>justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 13:45:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailythunder.com/?p=8672#comment-65333</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m with Joe for what it&#039;s worth, I think Denver is vulnerable without Kenyon Martin because they play absolutely no defense now (see the Rockets game).  Boston got blown away by the Knicks, do they lose to the Knicks in a playoff series?  Silly comparison, but the point is that one bad loss does not mean much.

Anything can happen in the playoffs if the ball bounces the right way a few times and you play well.  Denver over Seattle, Knicks over everyone in the lockout year, Warriors over Dallas.. the disparity between Denver and OKC this season isn&#039;t that large.  We probably have a better chance in a series against Dallas or Utah, but Denver&#039;s not much tougher than those teams.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m with Joe for what it&#8217;s worth, I think Denver is vulnerable without Kenyon Martin because they play absolutely no defense now (see the Rockets game).  Boston got blown away by the Knicks, do they lose to the Knicks in a playoff series?  Silly comparison, but the point is that one bad loss does not mean much.</p>
<p>Anything can happen in the playoffs if the ball bounces the right way a few times and you play well.  Denver over Seattle, Knicks over everyone in the lockout year, Warriors over Dallas.. the disparity between Denver and OKC this season isn&#8217;t that large.  We probably have a better chance in a series against Dallas or Utah, but Denver&#8217;s not much tougher than those teams.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: j-mo</title>
		<link>http://www.dailythunder.com/2010/03/the-battle-for-fourth-breaking-down-the-schedules/comment-page-1/#comment-65304</link>
		<dc:creator>j-mo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 05:42:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailythunder.com/?p=8672#comment-65304</guid>
		<description>This vid is from almost a year ago. (April 9, 2009)  You&#039;ve probably already seen it, but go watch it again.  Their talk about 3-29 really helps put this entire season in perspective.  This year these guys are going to be BUSY in mid- to late-April!

http://espn.go.com/video/clip?id=4055132</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This vid is from almost a year ago. (April 9, 2009)  You&#8217;ve probably already seen it, but go watch it again.  Their talk about 3-29 really helps put this entire season in perspective.  This year these guys are going to be BUSY in mid- to late-April!</p>
<p><a href="http://espn.go.com/video/clip?id=4055132" rel="nofollow">http://espn.go.com/video/clip?id=4055132</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MarcUpNorth</title>
		<link>http://www.dailythunder.com/2010/03/the-battle-for-fourth-breaking-down-the-schedules/comment-page-1/#comment-65303</link>
		<dc:creator>MarcUpNorth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 05:35:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailythunder.com/?p=8672#comment-65303</guid>
		<description>... oops got stuck on the last phrase between the &#039;rest of the season&#039; and &#039;the next game&#039; so I guess I spliced them together ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230; oops got stuck on the last phrase between the &#8216;rest of the season&#8217; and &#8216;the next game&#8217; so I guess I spliced them together ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MarcUpNorth</title>
		<link>http://www.dailythunder.com/2010/03/the-battle-for-fourth-breaking-down-the-schedules/comment-page-1/#comment-65302</link>
		<dc:creator>MarcUpNorth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 05:32:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailythunder.com/?p=8672#comment-65302</guid>
		<description>My take, for what it&#039;s worth, is that given the schedule that&#039;s left it will be hard for any team to displace a team in the top 4.  Lakers likely maintain first but 2-4 is a crap shoot and so is 5-8. With the quality of the teams in the playoffs I think the home teams have to be favored but any series could be an upset (though injuries have seriously hurt the Blazers potency and age and health don&#039;t seem to be doing the Spurs any favors).  Phoenix could surprise but the Thunder are the biggest X- factor.  

Regardless of who they play, the Thunder will be underdogs but they could really surprise and pull off the upset.  Even though the schedule should keep them from getting home court I think the tough competition will only help them prepare for the playoffs all the more.  Even the injury to Harden and getting Weaver some burn or compressing the rotation will pay dividends.  

The cool thing is its all gravy from here in, the team wasn&#039;t supposed to make the playoffs, management hasn&#039;t made any last minute moves to help bolster the roster for the playoffs, its all about getting better and getting the most out of whatever series they are involved with so that next year, and for years to come, they can do real damage.

Word of caution, as good as it is all turning out so far the Blazers seemed to be in about the same spot last year (although the Thunder&#039;s development seems even more abrupt) but with injuries this year their whole long term plan seems to have taken a serious downturn this year.  I have followed both teams closely and I think that the Thunder is even more promising than the Blazers seemed last year.  Can&#039;t wait for the rest of the next game!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My take, for what it&#8217;s worth, is that given the schedule that&#8217;s left it will be hard for any team to displace a team in the top 4.  Lakers likely maintain first but 2-4 is a crap shoot and so is 5-8. With the quality of the teams in the playoffs I think the home teams have to be favored but any series could be an upset (though injuries have seriously hurt the Blazers potency and age and health don&#8217;t seem to be doing the Spurs any favors).  Phoenix could surprise but the Thunder are the biggest X- factor.  </p>
<p>Regardless of who they play, the Thunder will be underdogs but they could really surprise and pull off the upset.  Even though the schedule should keep them from getting home court I think the tough competition will only help them prepare for the playoffs all the more.  Even the injury to Harden and getting Weaver some burn or compressing the rotation will pay dividends.  </p>
<p>The cool thing is its all gravy from here in, the team wasn&#8217;t supposed to make the playoffs, management hasn&#8217;t made any last minute moves to help bolster the roster for the playoffs, its all about getting better and getting the most out of whatever series they are involved with so that next year, and for years to come, they can do real damage.</p>
<p>Word of caution, as good as it is all turning out so far the Blazers seemed to be in about the same spot last year (although the Thunder&#8217;s development seems even more abrupt) but with injuries this year their whole long term plan seems to have taken a serious downturn this year.  I have followed both teams closely and I think that the Thunder is even more promising than the Blazers seemed last year.  Can&#8217;t wait for the rest of the next game!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: clarkem</title>
		<link>http://www.dailythunder.com/2010/03/the-battle-for-fourth-breaking-down-the-schedules/comment-page-1/#comment-65301</link>
		<dc:creator>clarkem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 05:27:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailythunder.com/?p=8672#comment-65301</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-65295&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@Eric4Mayor&lt;/a&gt; 
Are you kidding you said he had no basketball knowledge???? Sorry, couldn&#039;t not say something..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-65295" rel="nofollow">@Eric4Mayor</a><br />
Are you kidding you said he had no basketball knowledge???? Sorry, couldn&#8217;t not say something..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric4Mayor</title>
		<link>http://www.dailythunder.com/2010/03/the-battle-for-fourth-breaking-down-the-schedules/comment-page-1/#comment-65295</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric4Mayor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 03:03:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailythunder.com/?p=8672#comment-65295</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;#commentbody-65291&quot;&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-65291&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Joe&lt;/a&gt; :&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-65290&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@Eric4Mayor&lt;/a&gt;
Ok, your the expert. You win. I quit arguing with experts on blogs years ago.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
I didn&#039;t mean to insult you, my mistake.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote cite="#commentbody-65291"><p>
<strong><a href="#comment-65291" rel="nofollow">Joe</a> :</strong><br />
<a href="#comment-65290" rel="nofollow">@Eric4Mayor</a><br />
Ok, your the expert. You win. I quit arguing with experts on blogs years ago.
</p></blockquote>
<p>I didn&#8217;t mean to insult you, my mistake.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  www.dailythunder.com/2010/03/the-battle-for-fourth-breaking-down-the-schedules/feed/ ) in 0.25936 seconds, on Feb 9th, 2012 at 6:31 pm UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 9th, 2012 at 7:31 pm UTC -->
