Home > Film Study > Film Study: Last night’s final play

Film Study: Last night’s final play

The Thunder lost the kind of game last night that you lose sleep over. What if Kevin Durant had hit 2-4 from 3 instead of 1-4? What if George Hill doesn’t get “fouled” right before the half and awarded three free throws? What if James Harden were healthy? But you wouldn’t be asking yourself these mind-numbing questions had one shot not rimmed out. Thabo Sefolosha got a good look from 3 with eight seconds left, but just didn’t make it. And while “Thabo Sefolosha” and “last shot” typically don’t go hand-in-hand, Scott Brooks said after the game the play was executed well and KD made a good decision passing out of a double-team. So let’s have a good look at that final play, shall we?

First, the play. Russell Westbrook goes to the corner and then drifts out toward mid-court, freeing the corner up for a man, who in this case is Kevin Durant, coming off a down-screen on the baseline. Everyone else is basically a decoy. Serge Ibaka set the screen for Durant and got out of the way. Jeff Green is just floating and available for a kickout if there’s a drive. Not the most brilliant thing in the world, but in the end, it got a good look.

Two things jump out off the bat: 1) Serge Ibaka’s screen was terrible. Some of that was his fault, but a lot of that was KD’s fault. That kind of play is all timing and Durant either left a hair too early, or Ibaka was a little late getting in position to set the screen. Serge was flat out awesome in the fourth quarter of this game, but if I’m second guessing – and I am – why not have maybe the NBA’s best screen-setter in Nick Collison in the game to set Durant’s pick? 2) I like how Thabo was ready to shoot and took it confidently. He really stepped into it with no hesitation.

As a result of the poor screen, Durant is forced completely to the sideline. Manu Ginobili (hate you) leaves Thabo immediately to double KD. And since Durant is on the sideline, he’s essentially triple-teamed. In hindsight, if Durant had been immediately decisive and felt Ginobili’s double coming, he could’ve spun baseline on the catch. Keith Bogans would’ve been on his hip, Duncan would’ve had to rotate over and KD would have had a nice pull-up or a chance to dish. Of course in that moment with the clocking spinning down, it’s hard to sense that.

The trap has happened. Durant has two options: He could really force the issue, swing the ball to his left and try and plow through this double OR he could kick out to an open shooter. If this were Kobe or Melo, they likely would’ve forced their way through the double and heaved up a tough shot. If this were LeBron, he’s going to make the “right” basketball play and find his open teammate. It’s up for you to decide what you would’ve rather had. Obviously, Scott Brooks drew this up for Durant to take the final shot. But things broke down and he had to make a decision. If Sefolosha’s 3 rattles in instead of out, we’re praising KD for trusting teammates and making the right play. Funny how that works.

Like I said, Thabo was completely decisive and didn’t hesitate at all. Which is what you want. He was ready to shoot. One thing that’s hard not to notice is how much time is on the clock. There’s 7.2 seconds left when Thabo is lining it up. So really, he had more options. He could’ve gone to triple-threat, drawing defenders, and kicked the ball back to Durant. He could’ve given the ball to Westbrook and let him create penetration. Heck, there’s a slim opening for him to fire a pass to Ibaka if he wanted. But that’s the thing, in that moment, in that pressure situation, you have to be decisive. It’s not easy to run all those options through your head. Plus, it’s better to shoot sooner than later because it gives an opportunity for offensive rebounding.

Yes, it’s not ideal to have Thabo taking your game-winning try. He was the second option as the inbounder. So if you wanted someone else available for that shot, someone else should’ve been passing it in. But really, there are only two guys on the roster I’d rather had KD kick to there. One is Jeff Green and the other wasn’t in uniform (James Harden). So if Durant was doubled and made the right pass, who else should it have gone to? Eric Maynor? Kyle Weaver? Russell Westbrook, a 23 percent 3-point shooter? In that situation, with no Harden, Thabo honestly may have been the best option to take that shot. You can say he shouldn’t have been in the game, but who would you have replaced him with?

It’s true a better design maybe would’ve gotten Durant the ball with space to operate. But a simple thing like Ibaka and Durant syncing up on their timing could’ve made all the difference in the world. That’s not Scott Brooks’ fault. Yeah, maybe Nick Collison should’ve been in setting that pick. But players have to make plays. And if Sefolosha had made one more, we wouldn’t be talking about this. Such is basketball.

(Also, Sebastian Pruiti of NBA Playbook does a far better job breaking this all down if you want to have a look.)

Share:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • del.icio.us
  • Fark
  • StumbleUpon

Film Study

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest

@Vince

My last trip to Vegas some casinos has blackjack paying 6:5.. even on some higher stakes tables.

justin :@Vince
Guess that’s why I never come out a winner in Vegas.

Don't feel too bad...I never do, either. Believe it or not, here in Oklahoma to play blackjack you have to put down a 50 cent ante. Every hand. It's not a bet, either - you pay 50 cents a hand (or $1 for $50+ bets). Try beating blackjack with those odds -- it don't make a difference what you do on 16. If you ever come here for a game (like, say, the Finals this year), stay away from the casinos.

@bob:
completely agree with you 100%...

@Vince

Guess that's why I never come out a winner in Vegas. :)

Vince :
I have more complaints about the stand-around offense run the first 11:30 of the fourth quarter than I do about the last ten seconds.

Exactly! I said in the game recap that I thought even more important than the last play of the game was that we allowed George Hill to make Tony Parker look wholly unnecessary. We let that dude score 27. If we hold him to his normal production, we win going away.

@justin
Basic blackjack strategy says you should ALWAYS hit on 16 against a 7 or better.

Tim :@f5alcon That is my point…everyone here want’s to talk up Durant as one of the best players in the league, I’m not saying that he is not, what I am saying though if he is he takes that shot, you name the best players Wade, Kobe, Carmelo, ect 8 seconds left down by 2 they make the shot happen..thats what the best players do.

And they usually miss it. The Dime ran a feature on clutch shooting a few weeks back and the big names were in the 30-40 percent range in making last-second shots -- because they're doubled, shooting long contested jumpers, etc. I understand the Thabo complaints, but really the only other option is Green in that spot. I'm not thrilled, but I don't think it was an unjustified move. We got an open look for the win from a guy who shoots 31% from 3, in a play that also would have a very high offensive rebounding probability (outside double team, Serge down low, etc.). I have more complaints about the stand-around offense run the first 11:30 of the fourth quarter than I do about the last ten seconds.

Do you guys remember the Wide-open three by Durant in Memphis? Sometimes the shots just dont fall and thabo's three was in and out KD completely screwed it in memphis. I am not saying thabo should have taken that three and believe me he would be the last man on earth who would force a game-winning shot. How you guys(actually justin) go after him is just incredible.

I've mentioned before my high hopes for Harden next season.. I'd say it's crucial to the development of the team that he become a legitimate starter if we're going to have Russell as the PG.

@justin

I have less gripe about Thabo being involved in an inbounds play than I do about the actual execution most of the time. Just in Spurs games this year alone, we've seen James fumble with the ball calling a timeout, Russell taking the next possession into a wild heave and KD unable to fight through defense to free himself. Take the first Lakers game. You have KD heaving terrible long shots TWICE in a game to win it (regulation and OT).

Only recently have we executed smart plays to end games. The Knicks game was a good play (Nick set that screen btw). But you know, the Knicks aren't known for defense. Russell beat the Hornets two games ago on an elbow jumper (a shot I usually hate). And of course, Jeff Green and his dunk on Smith in Atlanta.

I am on the same page as you are when we're talking about the trouble that our offense has - but I see that as no different than our late game plays.

Durant was pushed out to far due to a poor screen. Brooks intended for Durant to get the ball inside the arc, and get fouled, setting up another play. Instead, the screen was poor, KD got the ball at the arc nearly out of bounds, and the Spurs didn't foul.

Maybe next year James will be our inbounding option. Dude can pass, he's got the size and vision, and you have to account for him once the play begins.

I'd rather have Chewie take that shot than Thabo. Chewie hasn't missed a three all year.

@Jax Raging Bile Duct

I know Thabo inbounds the ball on plays like this most of the time; is it any coincidence that we're inconsistent to close games offensively? Especially in super clutch situations?

I don't believe Brooks intended for Thabo to take a three pointer from there unless he was trying to out Popovich, Popovich (Duncan's three on the set play in the playoffs). But he had to know he'd be doubled off and Durant would not get a clean look at the basket..

@justin

What you're saying makes sense, it just isn't consistent with the pattern we've seen over the past season, because Thabo is used to inbound the ball on set plays more than any other player. You would state it that Brooks subbed Thabo in for offense. I would say that he subbed him in to inbound the ball.

And as I detailed earlier, there was nothing that lends me to believe that Brooks intended for Thabo to take that shot.

It's actually kind of exciting because it feels like with some better game planning and smarter use of our players we could have won a few more games here and there. Combined with the maturation of our players and whatever roster moves are made in the offseason, next year could be a very good one if the coaching develops as well..

I'd be happy but it'd still be a poor decision. Kind of like hitting on 16. It's not the right thing to do, but when that five comes off you sure feel like it is.

@justin
But if that shot goes down, then what do you say?

Look at that final frame again. Spurs almost have four players defending on the ball side. We have three players with two defenders on the other. Just a little ball movement from Thabo and either Green / Westbrook / Ibaka get an open look closer to the basket. If Thabo was a good playmaker, he'd have known to do this. He's not, and he shot the ball, and we lost.

@Royce Young
IF he has a fault offensively? Thabo is asked to do nothing but hit down open looks... He never creates shots for others unless its an obvious pass.(swinging the ball on the perimeter) His only job is to shoot wide open shots and he shoots 42% from the field with 30% from 3... That is pretty poor in my opinion..

@Royce Young

Thabo is a very horrible 3PT shooter from where he shot the ball. He's under 20% shooting from that spot this season, and somewhere under 30% from anywhere but the corners for his career. Combined with the fact that he's shooting in a clutch situation (lowers % for most players), and there's no way that Thabo's going to make that shot enough times to justify having him on the perimeter.

Thabo's a poor playmaker, the only regular in our rotation who has a higher TOV% than Thabo is Eric Maynor. Yes, Thabo turns the ball over more times per possession than Westbrook, Harden, Durant, Green, even Ibaka. He gets some assists mainly in the open court or making the second pass, not off his own dribble.

Like I said, if you're bringing in Thabo, stick him in the corner where he can at least shoot the ball to some degree. Weaver's shown sporadic ability to hit a three pointer, I'd rather have him trigger. Above both those options, why not use Jeff Green? Didn't we run a play like this with Green triggering against Phoenix that resulted in a huge three by him?

It's a poorly designed play that was asking for trouble. I'd rather Kevin Durant take a contested jumper double teamed than Thabo take that three, it's actually probably a higher percentage shot.

@justin
I COMPLETELY disagree.

First off, you're selling Thabo incredibly short as an offensive player. If he has a fault offensively, it's that he's too passive. No, he's not an offensive force by any means, but he spaces well and is a good passer.

He can make a 3. He's not a horrible 3-point shooter. And he was open. It's a simple thing, honestly. In your estimation, who would've been better in that situation? You really would've trusted Kyle Weaver there over Thabo? I mean, seriously?

The fact that Brooks subs Thabo in FOR OFFENSE is so nuts.

Honestly, there's nothing you can say here that justified putting Thabo in the game as the trigger man. Nothing. No matter how cleanly Durant gets the ball, Thabo's going to end up on the perimeter and Ginobili is going to double off. To top it off, Thabo was ice cold (Phoenix game anyone..?) and he's actually one of the most turnover prone players on our team (17% TOV). If you want Thabo in the game, stick him in the far corner or something. He has no utility whatsoever. As others have said, Maynor or even Kyle Weaver are better options to trigger the ball here.

Saying that Thabo had options is moot. This guy is a poor offensive player. He's not going to create shots for anyone. He's probably the last guy on this team I'd want with the ball in his hands beyond the three point line with less than 10 seconds left in a two point game. Aside from Serge Ibaka. And even THAT'S debatable, because Serge wouldn't have chucked from a spot where he makes less than 1/5 this season.

When your trigger is not a threat from the perimeter, or at a threat offensively at all in Thabo's case, a good defensive team will just leave him alone and that's what happened. I'm not sure all this analysis is necessary, it was obviously a stupid decision when it happened.

@andrew

I'm sure because...

A. I'm not even sure we saw the play Brooks had in mind to score with. In the post game interview Brooks said he expected the Spurs to use their foul to give. That would have created another inbounds play, probably a play they discussed as an option during the timeout.

B. Thabo is the 4th best offensive option on the floor at the time. KD, Green and Westbrook were all better options. Green didn't make a single effort to get open and Russell just ran interference. It didn't look to me like they were expecting the play that possession out. If they were, I think you would have seen those two guys at least attempt to participate in the play, because you know they are preferable options.

C. Even if Thabo does get the ball back, there is 7 seconds left to do something with it. Like I said earlier, 7 seconds is a lot. Nenad Krstic could go baseline to baseline in 7 seconds. Dribbling. Maybe backwards. I could see this being a valid option if there are 3 seconds instead of 7. Maybe this was the bail-out option designed for the second play after the foul to give was committed. But you would feel safe that Thabo could find a better offensive option with 7 seconds left on the clock. You don't design every last step of the play, but Thabo had options, he just didn't create.

D. After KD got the ball, no one even moved other than Thabo, and that was likely because he had to get in bounds. So if it were supposed to be KD shooting from there, only Serge could rebound. If it was Thabo, everyone was watching him, no one was trying to get open, no one was going for a rebound, and there was plenty of time to do so. So it leads me to believe that the team was wholly unprepared for the case in which the Spurs didn't foul, or they completely expected Thabo to drain that 3 with no backup plan to rebound a miss or offer any off the ball movement to create a play. The scenario that seems more likely to me is that no one expected the play to persist, and Thabo was surprised as anyone, thus the quick shot.

@James
we could also get a shooter in free agency, they are easier to get then a big man, and wont need major dollars.

Jax Raging Bile Duct :
@Mark!
But regardless of that, the play wasn’t drawn up for Thabo to shoot it.

How are you so sure? After the ball went to Durant it didnt seem like there was going to be any other player movement drawn up by Brooks.. It looked to me like Brooks drew it up hoping for a Durant iso with the option of a thabo 3 if he was doubled... Thabos lack of hesitation makes it seem like he was prepared for such a shot...

I was fairly confident that I wanted at least one good postman prospect in the up coming draft. Now I am more convinced that I want another outside threat. Even when Harden is healthy, we could use another perimeter threat. I wouldn't mind getting a James Anderson now. I was also very impressed with Fredette from BYU last weekend. Both appear to be team first guys. Although Fredette would have to play PG in the NBA and we really don't need another PG. Any ideas on perimeter guys that we might look at in the draft?

@f5alcon

I didn't say I would rather have Maynor inbounding the ball.

That said, you want your inbounder to be an offensive threat. They have a lot of opportunities to get involved in the play.

Maybe you wouldn't have rather had Weaver, but I think he's a better shooter than Thabo, despite his rust. That's the weakest of all the points I made, and not all of them were anti-Thabo. I'm done belaboring this point.

@Mark!

Thabo never botches the inbounds pass. The play before, Russell turned it over by stepping on the line. Thabo is the player that Brooks most often uses for set inbounds plays. He uses him because he makes the right pass at the right time.

But regardless of that, the play wasn't drawn up for Thabo to shoot it.

The Scott Brooks suit joke got a solid, 10 second chuckle out of me.

Love it when Simmons writes about the Thunder.

@Tim
they get easier looks with the clock running down, if the other team was mugging any of them like they do KD they would get the call, and teams cant run a double at them because the other scorers on the team are better.

ill agree KD isnt quite on their level yet, but he doesnt have the supporting cast they do either which helps them.

Simmons might think the "Zombie Sonics" thing is played out (which it is) and could possibly be phasing it out with an occasional proper reference to the team.

@Mark!
for inbounding the ball height helps a lot. So maynor would have a harder time inbounding, weaver has been horrible since coming back, collison and krstic cant hit the 3.

@f5alcon
That is my point…everyone here want’s to talk up Durant as one of the best players in the league, I’m not saying that he is not, what I am saying though if he is he takes that shot, you name the best players Wade, Kobe, Carmelo, ect 8 seconds left down by 2 they make the shot happen..thats what the best players do.

@Mark!
thabo is taller easier for him to inbound

@Tim
if you double kobe, gasol, bynum and odom are all dangerous scorers.

Just a few things...

1) Forget personnel, this looked like a play drawn up to get a 3 point shot. Why? We were gaining momentum in the 4th quarter. Before Ginobili's last free throw, we outscored the Spurs 20-17 for the quarter. The crowd was going nuts. Ibaka was destroying Duncan. The Spurs' shots weren't inexplicably falling. Spurs are old, we're young. Both teams on a back to back. Spurs had an OT the previous night. Why draw up a play for a 3 pointer?

2) I would've rather had Maynor, Collison, Krstic or Weaver in the game over Thabo for that last play. Maynor and Weaver are better shooters & better passers. Krstic wouldn't have been terrible for a pick & pop off a double, or at least a swing pass. Collison gave you a chance for a dish under the rim or a putback.

3) If you have to have Thabo in the game, why not send him to the corner where he shoots 0.340 instead of to the top of the arc where he shoots 0.276?

@f5alcon
Everyone knows Kobe is going to get the ball as well, I think either the draw up itself was not well done or the execution of that play was poorly done…but there is no reason why Durant does not get that shot.

@Boots

It's happened in the past. Some clueless editor "fixes" his articles. At least that what he claims.

@Boots
At 4:25 he calls us OKC.

@f5alcon
And is it lame that I took a screenshot of Simmons accidentally calling them by name?

@Omar
Look at the caption for the Sefolosha picture in that article. I don't know if Simmons does the captioning or not, but he clearly says the word "thunder" in reference to our team. Is this a landmark earth-shattering occasion for anyone else??

Every team knows we are going to give it to durant, thats why we usually lose the game winning tries, if we had dangerous other scorers it would help a lot.

@Omar
"I'm starting to feel guilty about refusing to call them by their name"

go to 0.25

that look in thabo's face kills me.

I would have liked to see a give and go between Durant and Thabo. The second that Manu leaves Durant to get Thabo, Durant could have cut into the lane right in front of Thabo for a quick give and go, getting KD the ball right at the elbow.

7 seconds is a lot of time. Nenad Krstic could go baseline to baseline in 7 seconds. Dribbling. Maybe backwards.

The problem with Thabo being in the game is that opposing teams will play Russian Roulette with him. They know there's, at best, a 1 in 6 chance he makes them pay no matter how wide open they leave him. That means whoever "guards" him is essentially a rover able to guard whomever has the ball. Sending him on the floor is basically playing 4 on 5 in the biggest moment of the game.

True, there aren't many great options. But Thabo is certainly at the bottom. Krstic could hit an outside shot, Weaver could have made Manu hedge a little more, and even Maynor could have taken the pass out of the double team and darted for the basket unimpeded until he got a midrange jumper. (Remember this wasn't a situation that dictated it had to be a catch and shoot.)

Of course, I still would love to see the Thunder upgrade their shooting in the off season.

Boots :
(Someone could have already brought this up last night or this morning and I missed it) Didn’t Sefolosha take one of these shots earlier in the year and missed it? If I remember, he had made 2 or 3 treys that game, and I had no problem with him taking it. In this situation he is pretty open, and while not ideal, you correctly point out, who else would take this shot?
My vote is alley-oop to Ibaka for a monster, 360 jam in Duncans face.

I remember against the lakers when KD fouled out he had a huge three and a nice jumper but he missed a three to tie the game and then westbrook screwed the game up.

As for the alley-oop. I was thinking of an alley-oop but no way to serge with his stones hands. I wanted Krstic lob to Green or thabo or westbrook. I'd say thabo because nobody was paying really attention to him.

I would've liked Thabo to pump fake it and drive to the basket. He would've gotten past Hill and Manu who running the other way to contest the shot and would've been left with a 2 on 1 with Serge against Duncan. But I guess his confidence to shoot the ball with the game on the line may pay off later.

@Boots
That's an excellent play. Why didn't Scott Brooks think of that!?!?!?!

Trackbacks

  1. [...] Film Study: Last night's final play | Daily Thunder.com [...]