Home > Commentary > Five thoughts on the All-Star Weekend experience

Five thoughts on the All-Star Weekend experience

I’m as ready as anyone to put a bow on All-Star Weekend and move on to actual basketball that means something again. I don’t know if you remember, but before the break, Oklahoma City was one of the hottest teams in the league, winning six straight and moving up to fifth in the Western Conference. But being in Dallas for my first NBA All-Star Game was quite experience and I feel the need to put down a few thoughts on it all just to close the door on it.

1. All-Star Weekend is amazing. I know that sounds simple, but holy cow, it’s unreal. Being around the best in the world for four days is just something else. The NBA does up its All-Star game like no other sport. Maybe some of the events are disappointing, but just the general atmosphere is awesome.

I could recount it all and potentially bore your brain out with a breakdown of everything I did, so I’ll just tell you about probably my favorite. It was just incredibly cool to be there with all the biggest names in basketball media and meeting them. Maybe this makes me sound slightly pathetic, but spending dinner talking with John Hollinger was just very cool to me. But on Sunday morning, Henry Abbott and Art Garcia of NBA.com arranged for willing media members to run some pickup ball at SMU.

And like Henry said when we were driving to the gym, what’s so cool about basketball is the ability to bring a group of people together and kind of bond and get to know each other around it. I only knew a handful of guys there. But through the game of basketball, I met a bunch of fantastic people and in the meantime played some hoops with them. I’m not a great basketball player by any means, but that doesn’t stop me from having a tremendous time. And if I might add, I believe my team won three straight at one point. J.E. Skeets was running some excellent point guard, with Steve Weinman of D-League Digest showing off a nice mid-range game. I just hovered around the 3-point line waiting for a catch-and shoot opportunity. We made a good team. BRING ON THE LAKERS.

The point, as always, is that basketball is awesome.

2.The stars aligned. I’ve covered a good amount of stuff in my young journalism career and have talked to some pretty important people. Bob Stoops, Adrian Peterson, Sam Bradford, Chris Paul, Sam Presti, Kevin Durant, etcetera etcetera (I realize that was probably some insufferable name-dropping there). And through all that, I’ve never been really starstruck. Nobody has ever really made me completely stop and go, “Whoa. That’s [insert person].”

But it happened twice this weekend. First was when David Stern walked by me. Upon seeing him, my immediate thought was, “I don’t belong here. This place where I’m currently standing, I shouldn’t be at.” Stern was just walking. Nothing fancy. But it was like seeing the President or something. You know he’s important, but he also looks, very, very important.

The second might be a little surprising, because it kind of surprised me. When the Eastern Conference All-Stars came out for the “practice,” I expected to be blown away when LeBron started taking jumpers in front of me. I expected to stand in awe of Dwight Howard’s shoulders. But the guy that stunned me was Kevin Garnett. I have no idea why, but there is just a “presence” about him. He’s an extremely intimidating person, but during my NBA childhood, Garnett was HUGE. And he looks intense when he’s laughing hysterically. I saw him and immediately turn around and ran away.

3. The dunk contest. Yeah, it pretty much sucked. Here’s my (wild, no-chance) idea on how to fix it: A total revamp. Instead of the dunk contest, now it’s the dunked ON contest. What are the best in-game dunks we see? What are the ones that show up on SportsCenter? When someone goes up and crams on his defender. It’s what we love. So almost in American Gladiator style, put a shot-blocker at the rim and let four contestants try and slam it on him. I think I’d pay money to Shannon Brown charge The Birdman from halfcourt to try and throw it down on him.

4. Kevin Durant was the focus of the weekend. He really, really was. Everybody wanted to talk to him, including McLovin. Obviously worldwide, Kobe and LeBron and Steve Nash and KG are the biggest names in the game, but among your well connected and respected media members, Durant garnered their attention. Which I found very cool.

In fact, Oklahoma City kind of took the whole thing over. Russell Westbrook scored 40 in the Rookie game and James Harden had 22. Westbrook then replaced Derrick Rose in the Skills Challenge. Durant did HORSE. Harden did some pregame thing before the All-Star Game where he ran drills with kids. And of course Durant played in the big game. The Thunder was just everywhere. It’s this sort of stuff that really helps to establish Oklahoma City as a legit NBA market and it helps people get used to “Oklahoma City Thunder” as a real NBA team.

5. The actual game was beyond spectacle. We all know Cowboys Stadium is amazing. But watching almost 109,000 people watch a basketball game was just mind-blowing. And the stadium did an excellent job of supporting it. Even though the arena/stadium is a giant spaceship, it didn’t feel cavernous. The mega-scoreboard actually does a good job of making it feel more arena-like because it’s kind of like a ceiling over the court.

I’d say Dallas did an excellent job. But then again, I don’t have anything to weigh that against. So for the same reason I say Saw I was the best of the series, All-Star Weekend 2010 is the best I’ve ever been to.

Share:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • del.icio.us
  • Fark
  • StumbleUpon

Commentary

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest

Seeing David Stern was like seeing the President? Wow, broke out the knee pads for that one Royce.

Ive been saying the same thing about the dunk contest. The problem? even if the NBA tried it they'd have to pay the shotblocker a lot of money.

Most teams lose money before they even step on the court (if you make $1m/g from attendance, concessions (usually about 40% of the profits go back to the venue - ford center) and merchandise (league takes a cut), and you have 42 home games, your payroll is 40m+, plus the cost of staff, front office, arena rental, travel, practice facility, etc). The primary revenue driver in all major sports is the television contract. In the NFL, it is shared equally among all teams. In MLB some teams have television contracts independantly (Yanks - Yes, Cubs & WSox - WGN, and Braves - TBS) with some revenue sharing that is supposed to be spent on payroll (royals, marlins, etc). Thats why payroll discrepancy and competition in MLB is the worst in major sports. In the NBA, there is a major contract with ESPN and TNT (much smaller than NFL) to do the league games that is split among teams, and teams have regional networks (like FSN Thunder) that additional revenue taken in. OKC being one of the smallest television markets cannot bring in the money through advertising that say the NY or LA or Chi can bring in.
Currently a big push among the owners is to lower the salaries of the players about 20% and put in a hard cap to do away with the luxury tax. The NBA owners lost over 400m last year.

Long explanation short, most teams lose money from the product they put on the floor regardless of attendance and try and make it up through league revenue (TV, Merchandise, etc) and thier regional network. Ours is small. Just wait to see ticket prices once we have to pay KD, Russ, Uncle Green, Serge, and Harden.

Camby to Portland not yet a done deal per hoopsworld. Will be seriously disappointed if presti does not snake in an offer before it gets finalized.

Camby to Portland for Steve Blake / Travis Outlaw is now official.

Keep Collison :
Random thought… I like Harden a lot but why did we pick him over Steph Curry? I just watched more highlights of him and when he’s on he just looks amazing. Are his numbers inflated because he’s on the Warriors? Seems like a good character guy and I think he would have fit in well. Not going to complain about Harden though. Merely curious

Harden has shown himself (in college and in the NBA) to be a multi-faceted SG, who is able to make plays both by knocking down jumpers and finding the open man (in addition, his defense and athleticism are underrated). Curry is more of a one-dimensional shooter. He's good, but I agree with Keith--Harden will likely end up being the better player at the end of the day.

I expect him to have a great second half of the season, with the confidence he gained last week in Portland and his good showing in the rookie game.

Keep Collison :
Random thought… I like Harden a lot but why did we pick him over Steph Curry? I just watched more highlights of him and when he’s on he just looks amazing. Are his numbers inflated because he’s on the Warriors? Seems like a good character guy and I think he would have fit in well. Not going to complain about Harden though. Merely curious

Because Harden is a far more dynamic player and has the potential to be a two way player and a stud that brings things to the table that you need in a 7 game series. Curry brings nothing to the table that will help a team outside of a jumper. When his jumper's not falling, or he is being exposed in a playoff series for thew tweener that he is, he brings next to nothing. Harden is and will be the type of player that can help you in many ways and to me is the better choice. Harden played amazing defense in cleveland on Lebron and seemed unphazed by James in stretches so he has potential on that end, while Curry couldn't guard ANY semi-above average PG or SG in the league. That is why Harden > Curry. Period. Presti likes multi-talented and versatile perimeter players while Curry is a one trick pony and a tweener.

Royce: for your Tuesday Bolts: http://www.hoopdata.com/recent.aspx?aid=154

@Keith
Exactly. As a matter of fact, there was a column on ESPN over the weekend about David Stearn spinning it both ways of late.

@Keep Collison
Curry came into the league as a sweet shooter without a set position and limited athleticism. Thus far he's definitely been a sweet shooter, and rather than not having a position, he can play the 1 or 2. Certainly I think some of his stats are inflated playing for the Warriors, but the main reason we didn't pick him was his defense. He certainly tried, and is a smart player, but his simply doesn't have the speed or lateral quickness to stay in front of NBA PGs, nor the size or strength to bother SGs. He benefits in that way on the Warriors because he's not really asked to be much of a defender.

Short term, Curry would have been a sharpshooter off the bench for us, and definitely been more useful than Harden. Long term, Harden has the skills, talent, and body to be an All-Star SG, and will likely end up being the better player.

It is crazy seeing a scoreboard that is bigger than the actual court. Could you imagine if that thing fell during the game? In one fell swoop the entire star base of the NBA would be wiped out. The look on David Stern's face would be priceless

Random thought... I like Harden a lot but why did we pick him over Steph Curry? I just watched more highlights of him and when he's on he just looks amazing. Are his numbers inflated because he's on the Warriors? Seems like a good character guy and I think he would have fit in well. Not going to complain about Harden though. Merely curious

@MartzMimic
Don't forget that the league and owners will want more stories like that to run in order to help them in the next CBA. I don't want to call those kinds of stories completely fabricated, but being a fan of math, I know that you can often present numbers to say whatever you want. It's easy to look like you're losing money just by adding extra expenses (which aren't really related to the endeavor) and only including specific income.

Joel :
JE skeets can ball? watching his podcasts, he appeared to suck at playing basketball

Yeah he wasn't bad at all. Not a great jumper, but he's got endless energy and he handles the ball well.

@Josh
The MSNBC column is the first mention I've seen of the Thunder losing money, and I am suspect of it's accuracy. The Thunder brings in just under $1 million each home game, and that doesn't include concessions and merchandise (from what I understand).

JE skeets can ball? watching his podcasts, he appeared to suck at playing basketball

@justin
Don't know why the Clippers would do that deal. Both of those guys are expiring contracts, so they would essentially be shuffling deck chairs. Wouldn't/shouldn't they prefer an expiring (Thomas) and our first round pick? I'm pretty confident we could re-sign Camby for another year or two. Don't see the Clips being comfortable with their ability to re-sign anybody.

@josh
Maybe Stern is including the team's buy-out payment to Seattle in his 400 mill projection. It is in his interes to paint as bleak a picture as possible. If that is not it, I don't get it either. Low salary. Lots of attendance. Makes no sense.

@Dylan

With 10 people on the court, it's easy to have poor defense go unnoticed. Put the stars in a 2 on 2 game with a teammate, and I guarantee they step up and compete.

Can some people from OkC or royce explain that to me cause there are alot of teams that ive watched that barely have people in the stands like miami atlanta memphis indiana MILwaukee philadelphia teams like that so i dont understand

Every time i watch a home game dang near all the seats r filled up and i have seen with my own eyes that we made 12 million last year while portland lost 20 million last year how in the hell is this team losing money this year it doesnt make sense

What i wanna know is how in the hell is Oklahoma City one of the teams losing money i thought OKC was recession proof and were winning and we made money last year how are we one of the teams losing money?

people complain about the defense in 5 on 5 all star games. 2 on 2 would be unwatchable

@Vega

I meant it makes Portland a lot better.

@justin
I hope it happens. I don't want Camby.

@JD
5 to 7 points seems kinda low, but I like the idea.

Sammy :
I posted this in the other all star thread, but what about just replacing all the Saturday events with a 1-on-1 or 2-on-2 tournament. Eight teams face off in a pick-up style half-court games. Regular fgs are one point, 3-pointers become 2s, first to 5 or first to 7 wins.

I've always thought about this. They need to get this done.

ha just from Durant's twitter...

Jus got out practice...talk to me..and yea I think I need a girlfriend..I be lonely

He just got back from what he said was his funnest weekend in memory and gets bored thinking about girls.

Adrian Wojnarowski reporting that Blazers offering Steve Blake, Travis Outlaw, and cash for Marcus Camby. That'd stink for us.

@Sammy

Those 2-2 games would be awesome . Imagine Rondo and KG vs. Westbrook and KD ......... Amazing idea

I also would like the see a "real" skills tourney kinda like and onemixtape dribbles and popular vote wins

you may be young, but you are a better journalist then a lot of the "pros"

That's great man. Thanks for going and recounting your tales of glory.

The dunk contest would work if the good players would do it.

A refereed pick up game is really a huge injury risk? These guys play pick up games all summer. The only risk I see is that some of the all stars could be too tired by Sunday.

Not going to happen. Owners wouldnt allow it, chance of injuries just to high.

@Royce I love the enthusiasm because you sound like a regular fan that got to be part of all star weekend... I'm living vicariously through you.

@Sammy Great idea. Seriously.

This is a well written article. I had no idea what I was thinking not going to this game. I have time, the money, and a place to stay but it never dawned on me I should buy tickets for this historical moment in basketball. I'm truly jealous of you.

I posted this in the other all star thread, but what about just replacing all the Saturday events with a 1-on-1 or 2-on-2 tournament. Eight teams face off in a pick-up style half-court games. Regular fgs are one point, 3-pointers become 2s, first to 5 or first to 7 wins.

Lol I like the dunked-on challenge. But nobody in the NBA would want to be the one getting dunked on. I think instead they should make it so a random group of Sprite drinkers have their shot at being "in the contest" as the group getting dunked on.

This sounds cool as heck Royce, and I'm glad you got to go.

I was going to be snarky and welcome you to "the next dozen all star games that will suck by comparison", but never mind all that. I'm jealous of you.

Trackbacks

  1. [...] I wrote Monday about my All-Star experience and how shellshocked I was seeing David Stern. Mike Seely of Seattle Weekly things I’m wrong/stupid: “But to Oklahoma City fans, Stern is a godsend. That we get. What doesn’t, however, pass the giggle test are awestruck press confessionals like the following, courtesy of Daily Thunder blogger Royce Young, who bumped into Stern over NBA All-Star weekend in Dallas.” The comments aren’t especially kind either. [...]