Home > Commentary > Heartbreak to happiness: How the last four losses might be an OK thing

Heartbreak to happiness: How the last four losses might be an OK thing

(Photo by David Liam Kyle/NBAE via Getty Images)

I don’t mean to go all Over-analyzing Sportswriter (also known as Jay Mariotti Syndrome) on you here, but I couldn’t help but wonder something as I reflected on four excruciating losses by grand total of five points: Could it be a good thing in the long run?

Now I know how stupid that is. Normally I’m the guy cursing the sky and yelling at an inanimate object when some writer tries to get Inside The Game and crawl into a player’s psyche. Of COURSE it’s not a good thing that OKC lost those four games. That’s just silly. Had they won all four of them, they’d be 28-16 and fourth in the West. Heck, had they won just two (which is entirely reasonable) the Thunder would sit at 26-18 and fifth in the West. So obviously we all would rather have had the wins and forsaken any potential learning scenarios to garner there.

But since I’m trying to find the sunny side in these four defeats, I’ll look at it this way: If a lot of a young team’s maturation process happens in tough losses where you have to look in the mirror and figure out what went wrong instead of right, then Oklahoma City got a season’s worth in these last two weeks. Yeah, it’s not a playoff loss in a seven game series. You really learn there and really feel the heartache and anguish of defeat.

But this team was in four games against quality opponents where it came down to a final possession. One stop here. One bucket there. Execute properly on an inbounds play. Whatever it is, there are things to take from the games. I worry that this string of heartbreakers may come back to bite the Thunder in April when they’re trying to make that playoff push, but still, the experience of having to look back on four tough losses may be almost equally valuable. (I said ALMOST, alright?)

Kevin Durant is on a rocketship to unquestioned supernovastardom, but he didn’t hit the shots in these games. I have no fear in the future, he will. And maybe these games right here will be the motivation and reason he hits a big one sometime down the line in a playoff game. He said this over the weekend after LeBron blocked his potential game-winner:

“I’m learning,” Durant said. “I’m learning each time I do that. Last year, we didn’t have this many close games, or the year before that. But I’m learning, that’s all I can say. I’m going to continue to be aggressive in those times, and hopefully they fall for me … I think I made a good move (against Cleveland) and shot a good shot, but it got blocked. Against Memphis, I shot a good shot and missed. It’s going to happen. I think I’m going to learn from those and hopefully I start to make shots.”

They’ll fall. Absolutely they will. Every star has to go through the growing pains. Nobody walked into this league and started hitting game-winners and making clutch plays from the beginning. Michael Jordan has missed more potential game-winners than anyone. But he was willing to take them and more importantly, willing to live the burden of missing them. Kevin Durant has that same mentality, which is why I have no doubt whatsoever that he’ll become The Closer of this team and start putting away games. You aren’t going to make them all. You’ll miss more than you’ll make. It’s the guys that keep coming back and wanting the ball in that situation that become the great finishers.

"I think I made a good move (against Cleveland) and shot a good shot, but it got blocked. Against Memphis, I shot a good shot and missed. It’s going to happen. I think I’m going to learn from those and hopefully I start to make shots."

I’m honestly a little shocked how easy it is to forget where we’re at. I can promise you, if I had told you before the season the team would be 18-26 through 44 games, you’d be OK with it. But here we are at 24-20 and talking playoffs. Yes, the more you win the more hurtful the losses become. Unlike last year, fans expect to win. When you lose every night, it takes the sting out of it. You’re used to it. But now, there is so much more to critique and question and criticize because we know the team is getting there. And it’s natural as a fan to want them to get there NOW.

I mean, this team is so young. So inexperienced. Even being in these games is new territory, much less winning them. So maybe a setback here or there is a good thing. It’s not all going to come easy and a reminder here and there that they’ll have to fight for it might be beneficial in the long run. Tough losses make you hungry. The pain you feel after one makes you never want to have to feel it again. It motivates you for the next one. So maybe if we deal with the heartbreak now, we’ll be rewarded in the future. At least that’s what I told myself this weekend. You know, it soothes the soul.

(But then again, screw long run stuff. I’d have taken four wins, big smiles and the joys of victory over an education any day. You can learn from making game-winners too I’m sure.)

Share:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • del.icio.us
  • Fark
  • StumbleUpon

Commentary

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest

dork :HAHA if you click on the pic in the article the look on those two’s faces say this..
LBJ – “eh i’ve seen it before”
KD – “HOLY #@$%!”

And their respective post game comments say the same:

Durant: (paraphrasing) I tried to be agressive and stuff

Lebron: (paraphrasing) Durant is good, but he was going right all night so I forced him left and made him take a bad shot, which I blocked AND recovered cuz I'm a ninja!

HAHA if you click on the pic in the article the look on those two's faces say this..

LBJ - "eh i've seen it before"

KD - "HOLY #@$%!"

I try to keep in mind that this season is likely to end in some form of heartbreak. Either the Thunder kids are gonna miss the playoffs, make the playoffs and lose in the first round, or even better lose in the second round. That's probably their ceiling right now. BUT this heartbreak is necessary to build the aversion to losing that ultimately fuels champions. They already have that young Tyson "I'm here to destroy you" swagger, but once they've really experienced their current capacity and taste failure at a higher level they will truly know how to enter the champion Tyson's "I'm here to destroy you...in less than 30 seconds" mode of winning. I agree with Royce, losses like they've had in the last week or so are smaller building blocks that will show them how to handle the competition once THEY are on top. KD is still getting the basic portions of his game down. The game-winners and such will definitely come along.

I realize it's easy to get caught up in stats, but is there any correlation between a team's record in close games and, well, anything?

Offensive efficiency? Defensive efficiency? Average age? Number of all-star appearances?

I realize it's probably an over-simplification, but I just thought it was worth asking. Maybe some of you have read something I haven't.

@MartzMimic
lol... nice. I guess that's fair. I mean you can only do so much at a time with a young squad before it's just too much for them to soak in.

Yesterday was my "Give Westbrook time to develop" speech. Rather than re-type it all, just re-read it, substituting "Scott Brooks" for Russ.

One other thing... I've noticed that what takes place in practice seems to have an instant (if somewhat temporary) affect on actual play with this team. I can recall a number of examples, like the other night with transition offense (even if they had to dial it down some in the second half) or gang rebounding. It really seems that the guys really try to learn and apply what they have learned... so hopefully that translates into some good work over this break.

Just a thought here but... We all know that Presti and Brooks are keeping it rather simple this year (ex. Ibaka rebound,run, defend)....

Maybe Brooks Is drawing out simple but effective late game situations but the players aren't executing it correctly? What do you think Durants naturally inclination is to do when the coach tells him he has to go get the ball? Durant standing there with one arm calling for it and the other arm being dry humped by a defender? Thats is what comes to my mind.

I agree with Royce though that these tough losses (Which my dog probally thinks I have asthema from all the deep breaths I have taken this last week after a game) that the team will be better off for it. :)

Goods points all. I'm hoping that these few days off give the boys and the coaching staff a chance to reasses things and make some adjustments on the offensive end.

And hopefully, Brooks does a work on his line ups. Seems to me that Krstic's jumpshot is going to waste because RW doesn't like to get him the ball... pair him with Maynor more. Same goes for Collison, who, can actually catch the ball down low and finish if he get's a decent pass.

They also need to work on Ibaka's offense. We talk about the fact that the coaching staff has been trying to keep it simple and work on his D, but I think it's time to get him in the game BOTH ends of the floor.

Also, under coach PJ, RW was an alley-oop wiz... let him Green, KD and Ibaka have a little fun. It may not always be the best way to score, but it does soooo much phsycologically.

Our offense needs some fine tuning for sure. KD gets the ball on curls, screens and iso's. We run the PnR some, mostly the PnP, and only with certain personnel. Earlier in the year we ran a lot of high ball screens for James, but he never passed out of them, and I haven't seen that much since.

I would love to see us execute an offense like Dallas. They seem to know exactly how to run the perfect offensive play for each of their scorers, go to an iso only on rare occasion (usually a Dirk mismatch), and have very few times where ball movement is at a stand still. Jason Terry runs that little low ball screen and curl very well, and you can see it coming, and you still can't stop it. When Dirk has an iso at the arc, you rarely see anyone standing and watching. They're just a well oiled offensive machine.

There are lots of times when we have 4 guys standing, watching Russell dribble, and not working to get open. Everyone in the building knows an iso or a drive and kick is coming.

I would love to see us develop a PnR game. With Krstic and Mullens around, I think the PnP will be around for a while, but we have no rollers to speak of. KD is the only one we run ball screens for. It's just a little elementary.

If we install an offense and the staff and players have a training camp to get it working right, we could see a jump. With the talent we have on our roster right now, I could see us climbing the offensive ranks to 14-16 range. I don't think we have the firepower it takes to be top 10 with this roster. Not with Thabo being a non-scorer and Krstic being a pop only scorer. Green and Westbrook could improve their shot selection and efficiency, and so could Harden for that matter, but that isn't enough to get top 10.

I'm a big Brooks fan, but I think there are legitimate concerns about some of the plays drawn not only at the end of games, but out of timeouts and the like. He had a phenomenal play at the end of the 1st half of the Spurs game (KD was a decoy and screened to get Harden an open look) but I haven't seen enough of that. We're not going to run the triangle with 3.9 seconds left but I'd like to see a little bit of misdirection or creativity at least.

I like Westbrook as the creator in a late game situation. I think he could break down a defense, get it collapsing and scrambling and make a smart pass to an open shooter. I really think he could.

@Jax Raging Bile Duct

Harden does get some PT at the end of the game. I distinctly remember him in during the last possession of the San Antonio game because I was so disappointed with our play calling.

Before the inbound, Harden is in the opposite corner with Ginobili "guarding" him. Ginobili was playing off him by ~10ft and was really in position to help on a drive into the lane.

Ball is inbounded to Westbrook at the top of the arch.

KD is franctially running around while two SA players (I believe Hill and Jefferson) are constantly fouling him. Practically took up residence inside his jersey.

Westbrook is forced to take a shot on a broken play that he missed.

This was a perfect opportunity for Westbrook to look for KD and then swing it to Harden who would have had an open look. It was such an obvious play that I KNEW it was going to happen as soon as the players were set up before the inbounds. I felt it.

Then it didn't happen. Harden just stood there, open. KD never got open. Westbrook took a low percentage shot. Maybe some of the blame could be with Westbrook for not having the vision, but I wasn't too upset with him for that shot. I thought more of the blame belonged to the coaches uninspired playcall.

Frustrating.

@justin

Maybe it's for some off-the-ball responsibility, like setting a pick. I know I'd rather have Nick set picks instead of Krstic, and maybe Thabo is our best screen setter of all our guards.

Or maybe Thabo is dismissed by defense as a late game scoring option, and there is a possibility of a back door cut in the design of the play, where a defender might not pay as much attention to Thabo as someone who has been scoring all night.

Or, maybe Brooks just likes to let his guys know that he trusts them to play well during crunch time.

Royce - I was thinking the exact same thing. a whole bunch of tough, tough losses. it'll be good for our team if we have guys with character that can learn from tough losses. If we don't, they won't learn, won't grow and we won't win.

Based on their relatively short history, it sure seems like we have a bunch of hungry guys that will grow from this, but we're not there yet, so we'll see.

The fact that Thabo is in the game during crucial offensive possessions really bothers me. I think it bothers me more than actually losing the game; I can't figure out any reason why Thabo should be in. It's not for shooting, obviously. It's not for passing, they could put Maynor in for that (for shooting too). It's not for defense since it's the final possession.

I just don't get it at all..

If anything KD should have taken the ball straight to the rim instead of fading away at the last second. He would have likely drawn a foul with both of those defenders having been in the air.

Also, Lebron didn't hit a game winner until at least his 2nd season (maybe 3rd) in the league. He did it against the Hornets in OKC. KD hit his first game winner in his first season.

Not that it's a huge tell as to which will be more clutch, but it takes a lot of players awhile to develop their clutch. It took Dirk awhile for sure.

I think Harden has proven that he can perform well under pressure. I'm not sure if Brooks wants to put James in those situations yet. He did draw up a play for James at the end of the Dallas game (or so it seemed) but it busted and Russell had to launch a prayer.

I just mean to say that I've seen James in the game late, and I've seen him on the bench late. So I'm not sure what the thinking is. Maybe Brooks thinks the pressure is too much. Maybe it's a matchup thing. I don't know.

But I do like James in late game situations.

@kev
I think an issue here may be height, as I wouldnt want Maynor doing the inbound if he can't pass over or around the guy guarding the pass.

I like Harden there as he is pretty tall and a good shooter, so I dont know the reason it's not him. It may go back to what I said earlier in that he seems to do a lot of the inbounds passes.

Agree with kev on all counts.. stupid shot, stupid offense. KD's low percentage in fourth quarters, crunch time, and especially on clear out isolations. Why put him in that situation.

Boots :@kev I always wonder that too, but he seems to usually be the person responsible for inbounds passes. Maybe he is the person who gets the most reps at this the most in practice?

good point Boots, but passers are easier to find than scorers - Brooks has got to get Harden or our point guard to pass the ball in - we need scorers so KD can distribute when its 1 on 2 . . . Thabo should be AUTOMATICALLY subbed out in a late game situaton when we areon offense . . .

@kev
I always wonder that too, but he seems to usually be the person responsible for inbounds passes. Maybe he is the person who gets the most reps at this the most in practice?

I want to point out that Lebron passed up the winning shot to a teammate, so it's not always expected that the 'star' take the last shot in a game. With this in mind, I have no problem with Westbrook taking that shot with 0:20 or so left in the last game or the others times he's tried to take that last shot. If we're going to keep this team together for the long run, we'll need more than one player who has the confidence to take that shot with the game on the line to keep the other team honest.

Just sayin' I dont think our mentality should be KD is our only option at the end of the game, but he should be our first option.

First of all - the last two were great losses - if any loss can be considered "great" . . .

We lost two road games to playoff teams (or contending for playoffs in the case of Memphis) in the final seconds . . . you can't ask for more in a loss . . . next year hopefully we win those . . .

------------------

as for KD, I'm sorry people, that last shot against LeBron was horrible . . .

He basically went 1 on 2, and that's poor offense. Yes, he had Thabo in the corner, but a wide open three from thabo (about 30%) is better than trying to score over two Cavaliers when one of them is the King.

The coaching was inept in that last few moments as well - why was Thabo in??? Why wasn't Harden in that left corner???

it made NO sense . . .