<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Monday Bolts &#8211; 12.14.09</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dailythunder.com/2009/12/monday-bolts-12-14-09/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dailythunder.com/2009/12/monday-bolts-12-14-09/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 09:12:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scuba</title>
		<link>http://www.dailythunder.com/2009/12/monday-bolts-12-14-09/comment-page-2/#comment-37821</link>
		<dc:creator>Scuba</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 14:55:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailythunder.com/?p=6532#comment-37821</guid>
		<description>Maybe Presti can sell Bosh on the Cost of Living in OKC... $17,000,000 in Miami would equate to roughly $21,000,000 in OKC. It&#039;d really be maxing out his max contract.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe Presti can sell Bosh on the Cost of Living in OKC&#8230; $17,000,000 in Miami would equate to roughly $21,000,000 in OKC. It&#8217;d really be maxing out his max contract.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crow</title>
		<link>http://www.dailythunder.com/2009/12/monday-bolts-12-14-09/comment-page-2/#comment-37753</link>
		<dc:creator>Crow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 04:26:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailythunder.com/?p=6532#comment-37753</guid>
		<description>Yeah I agree Mark!, Green needs to make some tough / important  inside moves. That is part of his job description.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah I agree Mark!, Green needs to make some tough / important  inside moves. That is part of his job description.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark!</title>
		<link>http://www.dailythunder.com/2009/12/monday-bolts-12-14-09/comment-page-2/#comment-37665</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 02:48:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailythunder.com/?p=6532#comment-37665</guid>
		<description>Throwing my hat into the Jeff Green discussion...

My biggest gripe with Green isn&#039;t his offensive style, size, ability to defend in the post, or his rebounding rate.

And while I love his locker room chemistry, work ethic, potential and versatility...

I think he has to be the guy to take the ball inside, get hacked and pull us through in tough games like the one last night against Cleveland. No one wanted to penetrate, and we gave up the game trying to match 3s with a team on fire from deep.

I can&#039;t get mad at a guy like Durant -- who has amazing shooting ability and a slight build -- for not wanting to pound the ball in crunch time. He&#039;s our super star, his skills are elsewhere, I *want* his body preserved.

But Green is athletic enough and skilled enough that he should be able to take it to the hole and get the fouls. If he&#039;s going to make his mark by being a &quot;jack of all trades&quot; he&#039;s going to have to want the win more than anyone else.

The only player we have on our team willing and ready to play this way is James Harden. I wonder if the game would&#039;ve turned out differently if he had been subbed in sooner in the 4th (he sat by the scorer&#039;s table a long time waiting to come in.)

Jeff has to be willing to do this. I&#039;m not sure what else he can bring to the table that makes him long term viable unless he makes a miraculous turn around on his per-minute production compared with other players at his position. I think that&#039;s an unrealistic expectation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Throwing my hat into the Jeff Green discussion&#8230;</p>
<p>My biggest gripe with Green isn&#8217;t his offensive style, size, ability to defend in the post, or his rebounding rate.</p>
<p>And while I love his locker room chemistry, work ethic, potential and versatility&#8230;</p>
<p>I think he has to be the guy to take the ball inside, get hacked and pull us through in tough games like the one last night against Cleveland. No one wanted to penetrate, and we gave up the game trying to match 3s with a team on fire from deep.</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t get mad at a guy like Durant &#8212; who has amazing shooting ability and a slight build &#8212; for not wanting to pound the ball in crunch time. He&#8217;s our super star, his skills are elsewhere, I *want* his body preserved.</p>
<p>But Green is athletic enough and skilled enough that he should be able to take it to the hole and get the fouls. If he&#8217;s going to make his mark by being a &#8220;jack of all trades&#8221; he&#8217;s going to have to want the win more than anyone else.</p>
<p>The only player we have on our team willing and ready to play this way is James Harden. I wonder if the game would&#8217;ve turned out differently if he had been subbed in sooner in the 4th (he sat by the scorer&#8217;s table a long time waiting to come in.)</p>
<p>Jeff has to be willing to do this. I&#8217;m not sure what else he can bring to the table that makes him long term viable unless he makes a miraculous turn around on his per-minute production compared with other players at his position. I think that&#8217;s an unrealistic expectation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Qball</title>
		<link>http://www.dailythunder.com/2009/12/monday-bolts-12-14-09/comment-page-2/#comment-37622</link>
		<dc:creator>Qball</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 01:24:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailythunder.com/?p=6532#comment-37622</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m glad that Jenni Carlson is around.  I would miss the awkward silence and sideways glances following anything she says in a round table discussion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m glad that Jenni Carlson is around.  I would miss the awkward silence and sideways glances following anything she says in a round table discussion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blake</title>
		<link>http://www.dailythunder.com/2009/12/monday-bolts-12-14-09/comment-page-2/#comment-37594</link>
		<dc:creator>Blake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 22:29:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailythunder.com/?p=6532#comment-37594</guid>
		<description>I hope we make a play for Gortat in the offseason. Orlando is really making a strong push this year, but will be way over the luxury tax next year and we might be able to take him off thier hands.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope we make a play for Gortat in the offseason. Orlando is really making a strong push this year, but will be way over the luxury tax next year and we might be able to take him off thier hands.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simeon Huffman</title>
		<link>http://www.dailythunder.com/2009/12/monday-bolts-12-14-09/comment-page-2/#comment-37593</link>
		<dc:creator>Simeon Huffman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 22:26:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailythunder.com/?p=6532#comment-37593</guid>
		<description>@ Justin I can agree with you on some levels. Yes Jeff Green is most definitely not the best PF in the league. However, you have to remember he was never a PF until under Brooks. And yes his defense has lacked at times, but you have to be optimistic, especially with the Thunder. As a young team the core 4 we have are very important. Especially with the market size we have, the chances of getting an already great PF is rather small. We have to hope to acquire someone who transforms into a great PF. Now I&#039;m not saying Jeff Green is that, but I do believe he has the potential to attempt a go at it or at least have an important role on the Thunder. What I was meaning though is that give him a few more years at learning his new position and possibly a bit better defense, he could be rather good. You can never count out a player at getting better at any point in his career. He has a long road ahead of him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Justin I can agree with you on some levels. Yes Jeff Green is most definitely not the best PF in the league. However, you have to remember he was never a PF until under Brooks. And yes his defense has lacked at times, but you have to be optimistic, especially with the Thunder. As a young team the core 4 we have are very important. Especially with the market size we have, the chances of getting an already great PF is rather small. We have to hope to acquire someone who transforms into a great PF. Now I&#8217;m not saying Jeff Green is that, but I do believe he has the potential to attempt a go at it or at least have an important role on the Thunder. What I was meaning though is that give him a few more years at learning his new position and possibly a bit better defense, he could be rather good. You can never count out a player at getting better at any point in his career. He has a long road ahead of him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J.G.</title>
		<link>http://www.dailythunder.com/2009/12/monday-bolts-12-14-09/comment-page-2/#comment-37588</link>
		<dc:creator>J.G.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 21:59:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailythunder.com/?p=6532#comment-37588</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-37586&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@justin &lt;/a&gt; 
Yes, under the current salary cap. It&#039;s expected to drop significantly next year, so you have to take that into consideration and adjust it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-37586" rel="nofollow">@justin </a><br />
Yes, under the current salary cap. It&#8217;s expected to drop significantly next year, so you have to take that into consideration and adjust it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: justin</title>
		<link>http://www.dailythunder.com/2009/12/monday-bolts-12-14-09/comment-page-2/#comment-37586</link>
		<dc:creator>justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 21:58:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailythunder.com/?p=6532#comment-37586</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-37585&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@J.G.&lt;/a&gt; 

Brendan Haywood is worth a lot more than $6 million; Nenad Krstic and Nick Collison make more than that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-37585" rel="nofollow">@J.G.</a> </p>
<p>Brendan Haywood is worth a lot more than $6 million; Nenad Krstic and Nick Collison make more than that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J.G.</title>
		<link>http://www.dailythunder.com/2009/12/monday-bolts-12-14-09/comment-page-2/#comment-37585</link>
		<dc:creator>J.G.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 21:55:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailythunder.com/?p=6532#comment-37585</guid>
		<description>To All,

No way do I want Haywood for more than $6 million over four years. In complete agreement there. But as impressive as the defensive stats have been for the Thunder, there&#039;s a reason why true bigs terrorize our team and make it very, very hard to win. Just take a look at the teams who have beaten the Thunder this year, and aside from Houston (Don&#039;t say Sacramento, Thompson destroyed us), they all have one very glaring thing in common and I don&#039;t think I need to say what it is. 

I do think Bosh would help immensely on offense, but it&#039;s more of the same problems on defense (if not worse) since, you know, he DOESN&#039;T play any!

Oh, and while we&#039;re at it, I&#039;d love to add a pure shooter who can space the floor off the bench and a lockdown, smart backup PG (if it&#039;s not going to be Weaver).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To All,</p>
<p>No way do I want Haywood for more than $6 million over four years. In complete agreement there. But as impressive as the defensive stats have been for the Thunder, there&#8217;s a reason why true bigs terrorize our team and make it very, very hard to win. Just take a look at the teams who have beaten the Thunder this year, and aside from Houston (Don&#8217;t say Sacramento, Thompson destroyed us), they all have one very glaring thing in common and I don&#8217;t think I need to say what it is. </p>
<p>I do think Bosh would help immensely on offense, but it&#8217;s more of the same problems on defense (if not worse) since, you know, he DOESN&#8217;T play any!</p>
<p>Oh, and while we&#8217;re at it, I&#8217;d love to add a pure shooter who can space the floor off the bench and a lockdown, smart backup PG (if it&#8217;s not going to be Weaver).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crow</title>
		<link>http://www.dailythunder.com/2009/12/monday-bolts-12-14-09/comment-page-2/#comment-37581</link>
		<dc:creator>Crow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 21:36:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailythunder.com/?p=6532#comment-37581</guid>
		<description>Hoopdata has a table showing the Thunder as the 4th most improved on offensive efficiency for data thru  12/8 compared to 11/13 but the defensive efficiency slipped about the 7th most. Do one or both of the numbers stabilize here or continue moving?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hoopdata has a table showing the Thunder as the 4th most improved on offensive efficiency for data thru  12/8 compared to 11/13 but the defensive efficiency slipped about the 7th most. Do one or both of the numbers stabilize here or continue moving?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  www.dailythunder.com/2009/12/monday-bolts-12-14-09/feed/ ) in 0.27270 seconds, on Feb 9th, 2012 at 10:03 am UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 9th, 2012 at 11:03 am UTC -->
