<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Kevin Durant, according to Sherman Alexie</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dailythunder.com/2009/12/kevin-durant-according-to-sherman-alexie/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dailythunder.com/2009/12/kevin-durant-according-to-sherman-alexie/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 15:56:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shawn</title>
		<link>http://www.dailythunder.com/2009/12/kevin-durant-according-to-sherman-alexie/comment-page-1/#comment-37122</link>
		<dc:creator>Shawn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 10:48:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailythunder.com/?p=6467#comment-37122</guid>
		<description>Alexie&#039;s writing is awesome. Not sure about this but I think he posted once at Blazersedge after the franchise relocated that he couldn&#039;t really follow Basketball any more; it being a painful reminder. If that&#039;s true then it&#039;s likely that he&#039;s not cognizant of the improvement in Durant&#039;s game. Anyway, though I can&#039;t help but feel for the guy, he should still have based his review on more substantial criticisms because this one doesn&#039;t hold.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alexie&#8217;s writing is awesome. Not sure about this but I think he posted once at Blazersedge after the franchise relocated that he couldn&#8217;t really follow Basketball any more; it being a painful reminder. If that&#8217;s true then it&#8217;s likely that he&#8217;s not cognizant of the improvement in Durant&#8217;s game. Anyway, though I can&#8217;t help but feel for the guy, he should still have based his review on more substantial criticisms because this one doesn&#8217;t hold.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Royce</title>
		<link>http://www.dailythunder.com/2009/12/kevin-durant-according-to-sherman-alexie/comment-page-1/#comment-36965</link>
		<dc:creator>Royce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 23:08:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailythunder.com/?p=6467#comment-36965</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-36964&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@Josh&lt;/a&gt; 
Well put.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-36964" rel="nofollow">@Josh</a><br />
Well put.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://www.dailythunder.com/2009/12/kevin-durant-according-to-sherman-alexie/comment-page-1/#comment-36964</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 23:06:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailythunder.com/?p=6467#comment-36964</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not usually one to stick up for Simmons...but it seems to me that Alexie&#039;s criticism, in addition to being uniniformed and unfair to Durant, is also unfair to Simmons.  Although, his review of Simmons&#039; work seems generally positive, in reference to Durant he is essentially saying that Simmons lacks persepctive or as he puts &quot;he is kneeling with his head against the pew in the Church of Durant.&quot;  Sounds like a nicer way of saying Simmons has his head up his ass when it comes to Durant.  

I&#039;m not familiar with his other work and maybe its great, but, like other posters, I really don&#039;t see why Alexie should get a free pass for talking out of his ass and I don&#039;t think we&#039;re out of line to criticize him for doing so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not usually one to stick up for Simmons&#8230;but it seems to me that Alexie&#8217;s criticism, in addition to being uniniformed and unfair to Durant, is also unfair to Simmons.  Although, his review of Simmons&#8217; work seems generally positive, in reference to Durant he is essentially saying that Simmons lacks persepctive or as he puts &#8220;he is kneeling with his head against the pew in the Church of Durant.&#8221;  Sounds like a nicer way of saying Simmons has his head up his ass when it comes to Durant.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m not familiar with his other work and maybe its great, but, like other posters, I really don&#8217;t see why Alexie should get a free pass for talking out of his ass and I don&#8217;t think we&#8217;re out of line to criticize him for doing so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sammy</title>
		<link>http://www.dailythunder.com/2009/12/kevin-durant-according-to-sherman-alexie/comment-page-1/#comment-36945</link>
		<dc:creator>Sammy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 19:43:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailythunder.com/?p=6467#comment-36945</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-36854&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@Royce&lt;/a&gt; 
Stephen King&#039;s opinions about baseball are as relevant to me as Ben Affleck&#039;s. These are the opinions of fans, not of analysts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-36854" rel="nofollow">@Royce</a><br />
Stephen King&#8217;s opinions about baseball are as relevant to me as Ben Affleck&#8217;s. These are the opinions of fans, not of analysts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.dailythunder.com/2009/12/kevin-durant-according-to-sherman-alexie/comment-page-1/#comment-36892</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 16:05:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailythunder.com/?p=6467#comment-36892</guid>
		<description>http://espn.go.com/blog/TrueHoop/post/_/id/11459/kevin-durant-eats-plusminus-for-breakfast


Kevin Durant eats plus/minus for breakfast
December, 10, 2009 Dec 105:56PM ETEmail Print Share  

Layne Murdoch/NBAE via Getty Images
 
Now making his team&#039;s defense way better: Kevin Durant.
By Henry Abbott 

This is such a funny story. In most of the NBA, it&#039;s kind of a geeky sideshow. 

But for a certain bunch of people, mostly in Oklahoma City, it&#039;s war. 

Here&#039;s the basic gist of it: For his first two years in the NBA, Kevin Durant had some of the worst plus/minus numbers in the NBA -- even as his traditional stats were off the charts. 

It was a weird deal. Very weird. 

I wrote about it, and it was taken as some kind of mean-spirited attack, even though I said all kinds of nice things about the player. Perhaps they were a little hung up on plus/minus expert Wayne Winston&#039;s statement that Durant&#039;s numbers were so bad, he wouldn&#039;t take Durant on his team for free. 

Durant responded to that post, basically by saying that real fans appreciated the fact that he was playing as hard as he could, and whatever plus/minus was we&#039;d be better off letting Kevin be Kevin. 

In a response, I talked about plus/minus. It can be ignored in small pieces. But two years of telling the same story ... that&#039;s a lot of evidence. Watching a metric ton of Durant video made clear that while he&#039;s amazing at tons of things, he had a miserable time defending the pick-and-roll, and closing out on shooters. Those two things alone could explain why his team allowed so many more points per possession when he was on the floor. He also tended to end up shooting against double and triple teams more than most players. 

It&#039;s a new season, though, and players Durant&#039;s age improve quickly. 

And so far this season? 

Kevin Durant may have the greatest plus/minus improvement in NBA history. 

He was one of the very worst players in the league by that measure last season, and now he&#039;s second-best. Only Dirk Nowitzki rates better in Wayne Winston&#039;s adjusted plus/minus. As of today, Durant&#039;s Thunder are giving up 11.5 fewer points per hundred possessions when he&#039;s on the floor. And they&#039;re scoring 13.75 more. That&#039;s unbelievable. (Interestingly, the next best player in the NBA, according to this early-season measure, is Marc Gasol. Then LeBron James and Luol Deng. If those numbers seem a little funny ... it&#039;s early yet. Plus/minus means a lot more with bigger samples.) 

Durant&#039;s agent, Aaron Goodwin, denies this has anything to do with a newfound regard for plus/minus. &quot;Kevin is a great player working hard to get better on offense and defense each day,&quot; says Goodwin. &quot; His team overall is playing better, and they are competitive in games now. Kevin Durant wants to be one of the best to have ever played the game, and he works hard toward that goal.&quot; 

Meanwhile Winston is regretting his exact choice of words. &quot;I should have said &#039;If KD played in the future like he played in his first two years I would not want him on my team.&#039; Clearly he has made a fantastic improvement. ... I would certainly want him given how he plays now. He is first team NBA and possibly MVP.&quot; 

I have been asked if I regret what I wrote. Heck no! I wrote he had great potential, but playing D like that, and taking some of those shots, he had hurt his team in his first two years. 

Problem solved. 

Hats off to Durant for his hard work. It&#039;s a happy story. Take a bow, Kevin! 

(And, if you have a free minute, could you tell your fans to stop sending all that hate mail?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://espn.go.com/blog/TrueHoop/post/_/id/11459/kevin-durant-eats-plusminus-for-breakfast" rel="nofollow">http://espn.go.com/blog/TrueHoop/post/_/id/11459/kevin-durant-eats-plusminus-for-breakfast</a></p>
<p>Kevin Durant eats plus/minus for breakfast<br />
December, 10, 2009 Dec 105:56PM ETEmail Print Share  </p>
<p>Layne Murdoch/NBAE via Getty Images</p>
<p>Now making his team&#8217;s defense way better: Kevin Durant.<br />
By Henry Abbott </p>
<p>This is such a funny story. In most of the NBA, it&#8217;s kind of a geeky sideshow. </p>
<p>But for a certain bunch of people, mostly in Oklahoma City, it&#8217;s war. </p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the basic gist of it: For his first two years in the NBA, Kevin Durant had some of the worst plus/minus numbers in the NBA &#8212; even as his traditional stats were off the charts. </p>
<p>It was a weird deal. Very weird. </p>
<p>I wrote about it, and it was taken as some kind of mean-spirited attack, even though I said all kinds of nice things about the player. Perhaps they were a little hung up on plus/minus expert Wayne Winston&#8217;s statement that Durant&#8217;s numbers were so bad, he wouldn&#8217;t take Durant on his team for free. </p>
<p>Durant responded to that post, basically by saying that real fans appreciated the fact that he was playing as hard as he could, and whatever plus/minus was we&#8217;d be better off letting Kevin be Kevin. </p>
<p>In a response, I talked about plus/minus. It can be ignored in small pieces. But two years of telling the same story &#8230; that&#8217;s a lot of evidence. Watching a metric ton of Durant video made clear that while he&#8217;s amazing at tons of things, he had a miserable time defending the pick-and-roll, and closing out on shooters. Those two things alone could explain why his team allowed so many more points per possession when he was on the floor. He also tended to end up shooting against double and triple teams more than most players. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s a new season, though, and players Durant&#8217;s age improve quickly. </p>
<p>And so far this season? </p>
<p>Kevin Durant may have the greatest plus/minus improvement in NBA history. </p>
<p>He was one of the very worst players in the league by that measure last season, and now he&#8217;s second-best. Only Dirk Nowitzki rates better in Wayne Winston&#8217;s adjusted plus/minus. As of today, Durant&#8217;s Thunder are giving up 11.5 fewer points per hundred possessions when he&#8217;s on the floor. And they&#8217;re scoring 13.75 more. That&#8217;s unbelievable. (Interestingly, the next best player in the NBA, according to this early-season measure, is Marc Gasol. Then LeBron James and Luol Deng. If those numbers seem a little funny &#8230; it&#8217;s early yet. Plus/minus means a lot more with bigger samples.) </p>
<p>Durant&#8217;s agent, Aaron Goodwin, denies this has anything to do with a newfound regard for plus/minus. &#8220;Kevin is a great player working hard to get better on offense and defense each day,&#8221; says Goodwin. &#8221; His team overall is playing better, and they are competitive in games now. Kevin Durant wants to be one of the best to have ever played the game, and he works hard toward that goal.&#8221; </p>
<p>Meanwhile Winston is regretting his exact choice of words. &#8220;I should have said &#8216;If KD played in the future like he played in his first two years I would not want him on my team.&#8217; Clearly he has made a fantastic improvement. &#8230; I would certainly want him given how he plays now. He is first team NBA and possibly MVP.&#8221; </p>
<p>I have been asked if I regret what I wrote. Heck no! I wrote he had great potential, but playing D like that, and taking some of those shots, he had hurt his team in his first two years. </p>
<p>Problem solved. </p>
<p>Hats off to Durant for his hard work. It&#8217;s a happy story. Take a bow, Kevin! </p>
<p>(And, if you have a free minute, could you tell your fans to stop sending all that hate mail?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: f5alcon</title>
		<link>http://www.dailythunder.com/2009/12/kevin-durant-according-to-sherman-alexie/comment-page-1/#comment-36890</link>
		<dc:creator>f5alcon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 15:04:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailythunder.com/?p=6467#comment-36890</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-36888&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@Omar&lt;/a&gt; 


thats mr. alexie</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-36888" rel="nofollow">@Omar</a> </p>
<p>thats mr. alexie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Omar</title>
		<link>http://www.dailythunder.com/2009/12/kevin-durant-according-to-sherman-alexie/comment-page-1/#comment-36888</link>
		<dc:creator>Omar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 14:39:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailythunder.com/?p=6467#comment-36888</guid>
		<description>why is there a picture of ray romano next to the article?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why is there a picture of ray romano next to the article?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lefty</title>
		<link>http://www.dailythunder.com/2009/12/kevin-durant-according-to-sherman-alexie/comment-page-1/#comment-36885</link>
		<dc:creator>Lefty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 14:10:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailythunder.com/?p=6467#comment-36885</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-36830&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@Ethan &lt;/a&gt; 

&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-36852&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@thunder &lt;/a&gt; 

Let&#039;s try and refrain from personal attacks, shall we?

I mean, clearly this is a guy as passionate about his former team as we are our current team (probably moreso, because of the way it was ripped away from them). Frankly, I&#039;m tired of this whole OKC/Seattle thing, and I think most other people around here probably are, also, and this kind of thing doesn&#039;t help anyone get past it.

I agree that it sounds like he hasn&#039;t watched much Durant this year, and when I read his thing earlier yesterday I had the same sick feeling in my stomach, because if a guy like this is telling other people stuff like this, it&#039;s going to stick around, and KD isn&#039;t going to get as much credit as he deserves for the hard work he&#039;s put in and vast improvement he&#039;s made on both sides this year. Thank goodnes for Abbott, amiright?

Everyone go vote for the All-Star Game! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-36830" rel="nofollow">@Ethan </a> </p>
<p><a href="#comment-36852" rel="nofollow">@thunder </a> </p>
<p>Let&#8217;s try and refrain from personal attacks, shall we?</p>
<p>I mean, clearly this is a guy as passionate about his former team as we are our current team (probably moreso, because of the way it was ripped away from them). Frankly, I&#8217;m tired of this whole OKC/Seattle thing, and I think most other people around here probably are, also, and this kind of thing doesn&#8217;t help anyone get past it.</p>
<p>I agree that it sounds like he hasn&#8217;t watched much Durant this year, and when I read his thing earlier yesterday I had the same sick feeling in my stomach, because if a guy like this is telling other people stuff like this, it&#8217;s going to stick around, and KD isn&#8217;t going to get as much credit as he deserves for the hard work he&#8217;s put in and vast improvement he&#8217;s made on both sides this year. Thank goodnes for Abbott, amiright?</p>
<p>Everyone go vote for the All-Star Game! :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crow</title>
		<link>http://www.dailythunder.com/2009/12/kevin-durant-according-to-sherman-alexie/comment-page-1/#comment-36878</link>
		<dc:creator>Crow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 10:26:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailythunder.com/?p=6467#comment-36878</guid>
		<description>If you get 3 over PER20 and keep a top defense then you really have built something. 

And Green or Westbrook might achieve that, though competition for shot usage is a constraint on PER acheivement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you get 3 over PER20 and keep a top defense then you really have built something. </p>
<p>And Green or Westbrook might achieve that, though competition for shot usage is a constraint on PER acheivement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crow</title>
		<link>http://www.dailythunder.com/2009/12/kevin-durant-according-to-sherman-alexie/comment-page-1/#comment-36877</link>
		<dc:creator>Crow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 10:14:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailythunder.com/?p=6467#comment-36877</guid>
		<description>PER20 for a PG is Rondo or Deron Williams level.
PER 20 for a PF could be Zac Randolph or higher.

Only 21 such guys in the league. Looks like 3 teams have 2 who&#039;ve played enough to count and the Lakers will  have 3 when Gasol qualifies.

Of course PER is not enough, but I am using it as shorthand.   You need good or great defense and at least good Adjusted +/- from at least a few.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PER20 for a PG is Rondo or Deron Williams level.<br />
PER 20 for a PF could be Zac Randolph or higher.</p>
<p>Only 21 such guys in the league. Looks like 3 teams have 2 who&#8217;ve played enough to count and the Lakers will  have 3 when Gasol qualifies.</p>
<p>Of course PER is not enough, but I am using it as shorthand.   You need good or great defense and at least good Adjusted +/- from at least a few.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  www.dailythunder.com/2009/12/kevin-durant-according-to-sherman-alexie/feed/ ) in 0.27735 seconds, on Feb 9th, 2012 at 3:59 pm UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 9th, 2012 at 4:59 pm UTC -->
