<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thunder fails to ride the momentum, comes up short in Sacramento</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dailythunder.com/2009/11/thunder-fails-to-ride-the-momentum-comes-up-short-in-sacramento/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dailythunder.com/2009/11/thunder-fails-to-ride-the-momentum-comes-up-short-in-sacramento/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:46:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thunder Fails To Ride the Momentum, Comes Up Short in Sacramento &#8230; - Download Free Ringtones to Cell Phone</title>
		<link>http://www.dailythunder.com/2009/11/thunder-fails-to-ride-the-momentum-comes-up-short-in-sacramento/comment-page-1/#comment-32898</link>
		<dc:creator>Thunder Fails To Ride the Momentum, Comes Up Short in Sacramento &#8230; - Download Free Ringtones to Cell Phone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 05:02:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailythunder.com/?p=5878#comment-32898</guid>
		<description>[...] by raulgray1985 on Nov.21, 2009, under Uncategorized Maybe it was because the Thunder was coming off a cakewalk against Orlando . Maybe it&#8217;s because it was on the road. Or maybe it was because the Kings have been playing better. Whatever it was, it just didn&#8217;t feel like a lock. Really, at this point, nothing does for &#8230; He went 1-6 from 3 and it wasn&#8217;t a great shooting night for KD, but he did what great players do – when things aren&#8217;t falling for you, take it to the line and he took advantage of that in every way possible. &#8230;More [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] by raulgray1985 on Nov.21, 2009, under Uncategorized Maybe it was because the Thunder was coming off a cakewalk against Orlando . Maybe it&#8217;s because it was on the road. Or maybe it was because the Kings have been playing better. Whatever it was, it just didn&#8217;t feel like a lock. Really, at this point, nothing does for &#8230; He went 1-6 from 3 and it wasn&#8217;t a great shooting night for KD, but he did what great players do – when things aren&#8217;t falling for you, take it to the line and he took advantage of that in every way possible. &#8230;More [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kev</title>
		<link>http://www.dailythunder.com/2009/11/thunder-fails-to-ride-the-momentum-comes-up-short-in-sacramento/comment-page-1/#comment-30672</link>
		<dc:creator>Kev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 23:05:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailythunder.com/?p=5878#comment-30672</guid>
		<description>FOr Durant, I have two steals, a block, a deflection, a loose ball (picked up).


On the minus side, I counted five mistakes.  One of Durant&#039;s issues is transition.  When  he&#039;s back, he often has to pick up Krstic&#039;s man when Krstic gors to the glass.  Twice alst night he picked up a man and was covering him.  BEFORE Krstic (or whoever) recovered, he LEFT the man to get his own - this led to two easy buckets . . . his decision to leave made no sense . . .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FOr Durant, I have two steals, a block, a deflection, a loose ball (picked up).</p>
<p>On the minus side, I counted five mistakes.  One of Durant&#8217;s issues is transition.  When  he&#8217;s back, he often has to pick up Krstic&#8217;s man when Krstic gors to the glass.  Twice alst night he picked up a man and was covering him.  BEFORE Krstic (or whoever) recovered, he LEFT the man to get his own &#8211; this led to two easy buckets . . . his decision to leave made no sense . . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.dailythunder.com/2009/11/thunder-fails-to-ride-the-momentum-comes-up-short-in-sacramento/comment-page-1/#comment-30664</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 22:41:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailythunder.com/?p=5878#comment-30664</guid>
		<description>thanks, looking at other scores it looks like Russell Westbrook isn&#039;t really a good defender even though people think he is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks, looking at other scores it looks like Russell Westbrook isn&#8217;t really a good defender even though people think he is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kev</title>
		<link>http://www.dailythunder.com/2009/11/thunder-fails-to-ride-the-momentum-comes-up-short-in-sacramento/comment-page-1/#comment-30658</link>
		<dc:creator>kev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 22:00:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailythunder.com/?p=5878#comment-30658</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;#commentbody-30639&quot;&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-30639&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Dan &lt;/a&gt; :&lt;/strong&gt;I dont know how you come up with the + 3 on Durant but the kid was really lazy in the first half. I mean he was literally jogging on defense. 2nd half he turned it up a bit, but still not a great effort by him.&lt;/blockquote&gt;


by the way, as an additon to that, +3 is an average grade (at best) . . . for a guy in the rgular rotation (28-30 minutes), +6 or higher would probably be above average . . .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote cite="#commentbody-30639"><p>
<strong><a href="#comment-30639" rel="nofollow">Dan </a> :</strong>I dont know how you come up with the + 3 on Durant but the kid was really lazy in the first half. I mean he was literally jogging on defense. 2nd half he turned it up a bit, but still not a great effort by him.</p></blockquote>
<p>by the way, as an additon to that, +3 is an average grade (at best) . . . for a guy in the rgular rotation (28-30 minutes), +6 or higher would probably be above average . . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kev</title>
		<link>http://www.dailythunder.com/2009/11/thunder-fails-to-ride-the-momentum-comes-up-short-in-sacramento/comment-page-1/#comment-30655</link>
		<dc:creator>kev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 21:55:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailythunder.com/?p=5878#comment-30655</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;#commentbody-30639&quot;&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-30639&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Dan &lt;/a&gt; :&lt;/strong&gt;I dont know how you come up with the + 3 on Durant but the kid was really lazy in the first half. I mean he was literally jogging on defense. 2nd half he turned it up a bit, but still not a great effort by him.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Remember, he started out the game with a steal (and a subsequent dunk).  Durant is not in the same planet as Thabo, but he is playing the passing lanes a lot letter than last year . . . I don&#039;t have the specifics now - but I will breakdown his scoring later . . . I will give you one quick example of how I score - if Durant is lazy and doesn&#039;t close out , BUT the opponent misses - it doesnt count against him . . .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote cite="#commentbody-30639"><p>
<strong><a href="#comment-30639" rel="nofollow">Dan </a> :</strong>I dont know how you come up with the + 3 on Durant but the kid was really lazy in the first half. I mean he was literally jogging on defense. 2nd half he turned it up a bit, but still not a great effort by him.</p></blockquote>
<p>Remember, he started out the game with a steal (and a subsequent dunk).  Durant is not in the same planet as Thabo, but he is playing the passing lanes a lot letter than last year . . . I don&#8217;t have the specifics now &#8211; but I will breakdown his scoring later . . . I will give you one quick example of how I score &#8211; if Durant is lazy and doesn&#8217;t close out , BUT the opponent misses &#8211; it doesnt count against him . . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kev</title>
		<link>http://www.dailythunder.com/2009/11/thunder-fails-to-ride-the-momentum-comes-up-short-in-sacramento/comment-page-1/#comment-30653</link>
		<dc:creator>kev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 21:49:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailythunder.com/?p=5878#comment-30653</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;#commentbody-30646&quot;&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-30646&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Crow &lt;/a&gt; :&lt;/strong&gt;Kev, in your system does failing to contest a shot or a shot that goes in count as a negative? Ideally it would to some degree.&lt;/blockquote&gt;


yes - failing to contest a shot that goes counts as a negative (assuming that person had responsibility) . . .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote cite="#commentbody-30646"><p>
<strong><a href="#comment-30646" rel="nofollow">Crow </a> :</strong>Kev, in your system does failing to contest a shot or a shot that goes in count as a negative? Ideally it would to some degree.</p></blockquote>
<p>yes &#8211; failing to contest a shot that goes counts as a negative (assuming that person had responsibility) . . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crow</title>
		<link>http://www.dailythunder.com/2009/11/thunder-fails-to-ride-the-momentum-comes-up-short-in-sacramento/comment-page-1/#comment-30646</link>
		<dc:creator>Crow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 21:01:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailythunder.com/?p=5878#comment-30646</guid>
		<description>Kev, in your system does failing to contest a shot or a shot that goes in count as a negative? Ideally it would to some degree.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kev, in your system does failing to contest a shot or a shot that goes in count as a negative? Ideally it would to some degree.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crow</title>
		<link>http://www.dailythunder.com/2009/11/thunder-fails-to-ride-the-momentum-comes-up-short-in-sacramento/comment-page-1/#comment-30645</link>
		<dc:creator>Crow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 20:59:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailythunder.com/?p=5878#comment-30645</guid>
		<description>Of course the actual number of Westbrook&#039;s turnovers matters a lot and by &quot;more&quot;  I meant more by percentage. There isn&#039;t an ideal percentage breakdown but I computed the average for a quick 5 player sample of PGs last season: 


about 8% of turnovers were offensive fouls, 48% were bad passes and 44% were ball-handling errors.

So by comparison this season Russell has a much &quot;higher percentage&quot; of offensive fouls and a much lower percentage of ball-handling errors.

It might not be a &quot;very&quot; helpful split but I checked it for what it might show / be worth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course the actual number of Westbrook&#8217;s turnovers matters a lot and by &#8220;more&#8221;  I meant more by percentage. There isn&#8217;t an ideal percentage breakdown but I computed the average for a quick 5 player sample of PGs last season: </p>
<p>about 8% of turnovers were offensive fouls, 48% were bad passes and 44% were ball-handling errors.</p>
<p>So by comparison this season Russell has a much &#8220;higher percentage&#8221; of offensive fouls and a much lower percentage of ball-handling errors.</p>
<p>It might not be a &#8220;very&#8221; helpful split but I checked it for what it might show / be worth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jax Raging Bile Duct</title>
		<link>http://www.dailythunder.com/2009/11/thunder-fails-to-ride-the-momentum-comes-up-short-in-sacramento/comment-page-1/#comment-30640</link>
		<dc:creator>Jax Raging Bile Duct</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 19:30:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailythunder.com/?p=5878#comment-30640</guid>
		<description>The effort and intensity was just weak. WEEEAAAKK. Weak.

We got our butts handed to us on the boards. We allowed way to much penetration. If I weren&#039;t so disgusted with the effort, I&#039;d look up the Kings shot chart. It seemed in the first half all we gave them were layups and 5 foot jumpers. I realize the way the rules are now, that penetration is much harder to stop, but our rotating help was poor.

It really hurts us when Jeff Green gets in foul trouble and has to sit. Everyone was a foul machine last night, but Nick continues to draw more whistles in a shorter time than anyone.

So frustrated with Russell last night. He hit that early three and gave me hope, then he missed shots at point blank range the rest of the night. I don&#039;t know what happened to Thabo&#039;s shot, but it must be at a picnic with Russell&#039;s shot, because neither of them showed for the game.

It was just flat out weak.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The effort and intensity was just weak. WEEEAAAKK. Weak.</p>
<p>We got our butts handed to us on the boards. We allowed way to much penetration. If I weren&#8217;t so disgusted with the effort, I&#8217;d look up the Kings shot chart. It seemed in the first half all we gave them were layups and 5 foot jumpers. I realize the way the rules are now, that penetration is much harder to stop, but our rotating help was poor.</p>
<p>It really hurts us when Jeff Green gets in foul trouble and has to sit. Everyone was a foul machine last night, but Nick continues to draw more whistles in a shorter time than anyone.</p>
<p>So frustrated with Russell last night. He hit that early three and gave me hope, then he missed shots at point blank range the rest of the night. I don&#8217;t know what happened to Thabo&#8217;s shot, but it must be at a picnic with Russell&#8217;s shot, because neither of them showed for the game.</p>
<p>It was just flat out weak.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.dailythunder.com/2009/11/thunder-fails-to-ride-the-momentum-comes-up-short-in-sacramento/comment-page-1/#comment-30639</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 19:19:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailythunder.com/?p=5878#comment-30639</guid>
		<description>I dont know how you come up with the + 3 on Durant but the kid was really lazy in the first half.  I mean he was literally jogging on defense.  2nd half he turned it up a bit, but still not a great effort by him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dont know how you come up with the + 3 on Durant but the kid was really lazy in the first half.  I mean he was literally jogging on defense.  2nd half he turned it up a bit, but still not a great effort by him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  www.dailythunder.com/2009/11/thunder-fails-to-ride-the-momentum-comes-up-short-in-sacramento/feed/ ) in 0.25363 seconds, on Feb 9th, 2012 at 8:48 pm UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 9th, 2012 at 9:48 pm UTC -->
