<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Some words about Pace</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dailythunder.com/2009/11/some-words-about-pace/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dailythunder.com/2009/11/some-words-about-pace/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 09:12:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.dailythunder.com/2009/11/some-words-about-pace/comment-page-2/#comment-30405</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 01:40:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailythunder.com/?p=5847#comment-30405</guid>
		<description>Back when they were the Sonics and the move looked inevitable I read in the Seattle papers where Seattle was the #12 best/biggest sports market and OKC was 45th.

But, and it&#039;s a huge huge but, it&#039;s also the only game in town, much like San Antonio and Utah and a few others. No baseball or football to contend with and that is a pretty big deal. There is only so many places to spend the entertainment dollar and there are fewer options in OKC. So that is a benefit for the team.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Back when they were the Sonics and the move looked inevitable I read in the Seattle papers where Seattle was the #12 best/biggest sports market and OKC was 45th.</p>
<p>But, and it&#8217;s a huge huge but, it&#8217;s also the only game in town, much like San Antonio and Utah and a few others. No baseball or football to contend with and that is a pretty big deal. There is only so many places to spend the entertainment dollar and there are fewer options in OKC. So that is a benefit for the team.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tapdog72</title>
		<link>http://www.dailythunder.com/2009/11/some-words-about-pace/comment-page-2/#comment-30336</link>
		<dc:creator>Tapdog72</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 18:00:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailythunder.com/?p=5847#comment-30336</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-30308&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@Terry &lt;/a&gt; 

&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-30333&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@CGHill &lt;/a&gt; 
I&#039;d guess that New Orleans gets a pass due to Katrina, or they are just assuming...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-30308" rel="nofollow">@Terry </a> </p>
<p><a href="#comment-30333" rel="nofollow">@CGHill </a><br />
I&#8217;d guess that New Orleans gets a pass due to Katrina, or they are just assuming&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CGHill</title>
		<link>http://www.dailythunder.com/2009/11/some-words-about-pace/comment-page-2/#comment-30333</link>
		<dc:creator>CGHill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 17:43:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailythunder.com/?p=5847#comment-30333</guid>
		<description>Nielsen DMAs for 2009-10:

31 (+2): Salt Lake City
35 (unch): Milwaukee
37 (unch): San Antonio
45 (unch): Oklahoma City
50 (-2): Memphis
51 (+2): New Orleans

Complete list (PDF):
http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/2009-2010-dma-ranks.pdf</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nielsen DMAs for 2009-10:</p>
<p>31 (+2): Salt Lake City<br />
35 (unch): Milwaukee<br />
37 (unch): San Antonio<br />
45 (unch): Oklahoma City<br />
50 (-2): Memphis<br />
51 (+2): New Orleans</p>
<p>Complete list (PDF):<br />
<a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/2009-2010-dma-ranks.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/2009-2010-dma-ranks.pdf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terry</title>
		<link>http://www.dailythunder.com/2009/11/some-words-about-pace/comment-page-2/#comment-30317</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 16:48:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailythunder.com/?p=5847#comment-30317</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;#commentbody-30311&quot;&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-30311&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Bryan &lt;/a&gt; :&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-30308&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@Terry&lt;/A&gt;Market size does not necessarily denote metro population because it also includes reach to surounding markets and market penetration. My sense is that once OKC starts winning, market size will go up.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Good point.  &#039;Media&#039; market - yes, we prob are the smallest.  

I saw recently, here, or maybe in the newspaper, that the games are now being televised in Wichita and Topeka, adding something like 500,000 homes.  It&#039;s all good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote cite="#commentbody-30311"><p>
<strong><a href="#comment-30311" rel="nofollow">Bryan </a> :</strong><a href="#comment-30308" rel="nofollow">@Terry</a>Market size does not necessarily denote metro population because it also includes reach to surounding markets and market penetration. My sense is that once OKC starts winning, market size will go up.</p></blockquote>
<p>Good point.  &#8216;Media&#8217; market &#8211; yes, we prob are the smallest.  </p>
<p>I saw recently, here, or maybe in the newspaper, that the games are now being televised in Wichita and Topeka, adding something like 500,000 homes.  It&#8217;s all good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan</title>
		<link>http://www.dailythunder.com/2009/11/some-words-about-pace/comment-page-2/#comment-30311</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 16:29:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailythunder.com/?p=5847#comment-30311</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-30308&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@Terry&lt;/a&gt; 
Market size does not necessarily denote metro population because it also includes reach to surounding markets and market penetration. My sense is that once OKC starts winning, market size will go up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-30308" rel="nofollow">@Terry</a><br />
Market size does not necessarily denote metro population because it also includes reach to surounding markets and market penetration. My sense is that once OKC starts winning, market size will go up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terry</title>
		<link>http://www.dailythunder.com/2009/11/some-words-about-pace/comment-page-2/#comment-30309</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 16:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailythunder.com/?p=5847#comment-30309</guid>
		<description>And,to the comment about the weather -- don&#039;t know about you guys, but I love a good Thunderstorm!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And,to the comment about the weather &#8212; don&#8217;t know about you guys, but I love a good Thunderstorm!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terry</title>
		<link>http://www.dailythunder.com/2009/11/some-words-about-pace/comment-page-2/#comment-30308</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 16:09:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailythunder.com/?p=5847#comment-30308</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;#commentbody-30306&quot;&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-30306&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Tapdog72 &lt;/a&gt; :&lt;/strong&gt;Future Power Rankings on ESPN:4. Oklahoma City Thunder ....
One area in which they didn’t fare as well, however, was in the market category. Oklahoma City is the smallest NBA market and plagued by some wild weather, two factors that combine to put it well off the radar for most prospective free agents. But there’s hope: The Thunder have an excited fan base, and Oklahoma City might look like a pretty good destination if the Thunder start winning big.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Not to split hairs, but according to the U.S. Census Bureau (2008), Oklahoma City is not the smallest NBA market:

41.  Memphis (1.285 million - metro)
44.  Oklahoma City (1.206 million - metro)
46.  New Orleans (1.134 million - metro)
49.  Salt Lake City (1.115 million - metro)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote cite="#commentbody-30306"><p>
<strong><a href="#comment-30306" rel="nofollow">Tapdog72 </a> :</strong>Future Power Rankings on ESPN:4. Oklahoma City Thunder &#8230;.<br />
One area in which they didn’t fare as well, however, was in the market category. Oklahoma City is the smallest NBA market and plagued by some wild weather, two factors that combine to put it well off the radar for most prospective free agents. But there’s hope: The Thunder have an excited fan base, and Oklahoma City might look like a pretty good destination if the Thunder start winning big.</p></blockquote>
<p>Not to split hairs, but according to the U.S. Census Bureau (2008), Oklahoma City is not the smallest NBA market:</p>
<p>41.  Memphis (1.285 million &#8211; metro)<br />
44.  Oklahoma City (1.206 million &#8211; metro)<br />
46.  New Orleans (1.134 million &#8211; metro)<br />
49.  Salt Lake City (1.115 million &#8211; metro)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brett</title>
		<link>http://www.dailythunder.com/2009/11/some-words-about-pace/comment-page-2/#comment-30307</link>
		<dc:creator>Brett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 15:58:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailythunder.com/?p=5847#comment-30307</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-30306&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@Tapdog72 &lt;/a&gt; 
Thanks!  Not a bad prospect.  I think the free agents will look at us once we start winning and they realize that someone like KD likes it here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-30306" rel="nofollow">@Tapdog72 </a><br />
Thanks!  Not a bad prospect.  I think the free agents will look at us once we start winning and they realize that someone like KD likes it here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tapdog72</title>
		<link>http://www.dailythunder.com/2009/11/some-words-about-pace/comment-page-2/#comment-30306</link>
		<dc:creator>Tapdog72</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 15:34:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailythunder.com/?p=5847#comment-30306</guid>
		<description>Future Power Rankings on ESPN:
4. Oklahoma City Thunder &#124; Future Power Rating: 637

PLAYERS MANAGEMENT MONEY MARKET DRAFT 
274 (6th) 139 (9th) 125 (6th) 36 (23rd) 63 (10th) 

Oklahoma City may not make the playoffs this year, but for the three years that follow, the Thunder&#039;s hopes seems as bright as any team&#039;s. 

It starts with a rapidly improving roster that includes star forward Kevin Durant and rising talents like Russell Westbrook, James Harden and Jeff Green, as well as several intriguing prospects -- Thabo Sefolosha, B.J. Mullens, Serge Ibaka and D.J. White among them. 

Oklahoma City also ranks high in the money category, having more than $10 million to spend this summer on a free-agent splurge to cement its already strong nucleus while maintaining a very good cap situation for future seasons. The only question is whether owner Clay Bennett will commit to spending once the time comes. But thanks to the strong moves made thus far by GM Sam Presti, OKC earned a ninth-place ranking in the management category. 

The Thunder also scored well on the draft, owning both their pick and an unprotected choice from Phoenix in next year&#039;s draft before their likely ascension to the back end of the draft in future seasons. 

One area in which they didn&#039;t fare as well, however, was in the market category. Oklahoma City is the smallest NBA market and plagued by some wild weather, two factors that combine to put it well off the radar for most prospective free agents. But there&#039;s hope: The Thunder have an excited fan base, and Oklahoma City might look like a pretty good destination if the Thunder start winning big.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Future Power Rankings on ESPN:<br />
4. Oklahoma City Thunder | Future Power Rating: 637</p>
<p>PLAYERS MANAGEMENT MONEY MARKET DRAFT<br />
274 (6th) 139 (9th) 125 (6th) 36 (23rd) 63 (10th) </p>
<p>Oklahoma City may not make the playoffs this year, but for the three years that follow, the Thunder&#8217;s hopes seems as bright as any team&#8217;s. </p>
<p>It starts with a rapidly improving roster that includes star forward Kevin Durant and rising talents like Russell Westbrook, James Harden and Jeff Green, as well as several intriguing prospects &#8212; Thabo Sefolosha, B.J. Mullens, Serge Ibaka and D.J. White among them. </p>
<p>Oklahoma City also ranks high in the money category, having more than $10 million to spend this summer on a free-agent splurge to cement its already strong nucleus while maintaining a very good cap situation for future seasons. The only question is whether owner Clay Bennett will commit to spending once the time comes. But thanks to the strong moves made thus far by GM Sam Presti, OKC earned a ninth-place ranking in the management category. </p>
<p>The Thunder also scored well on the draft, owning both their pick and an unprotected choice from Phoenix in next year&#8217;s draft before their likely ascension to the back end of the draft in future seasons. </p>
<p>One area in which they didn&#8217;t fare as well, however, was in the market category. Oklahoma City is the smallest NBA market and plagued by some wild weather, two factors that combine to put it well off the radar for most prospective free agents. But there&#8217;s hope: The Thunder have an excited fan base, and Oklahoma City might look like a pretty good destination if the Thunder start winning big.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brett</title>
		<link>http://www.dailythunder.com/2009/11/some-words-about-pace/comment-page-2/#comment-30304</link>
		<dc:creator>Brett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 14:52:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailythunder.com/?p=5847#comment-30304</guid>
		<description>Has anyone seen the Future Power Rankings on ESPN?  I don&#039;t have Insider, so I can&#039;t see past the first two.  They have Durant on the main page of it, so I was curious where they put OKC.  Any heads up would be great.  Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has anyone seen the Future Power Rankings on ESPN?  I don&#8217;t have Insider, so I can&#8217;t see past the first two.  They have Durant on the main page of it, so I was curious where they put OKC.  Any heads up would be great.  Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  www.dailythunder.com/2009/11/some-words-about-pace/feed/ ) in 0.25074 seconds, on Feb 9th, 2012 at 10:17 am UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 9th, 2012 at 11:17 am UTC -->
