Home > Recap > Houston crushes the Thunder on the glass, wins game

Houston crushes the Thunder on the glass, wins game

BOX SCORE

(AP Photo/Sue Ogrocki)

(AP Photo/Sue Ogrocki)

Some losses are frustrating because of who you lost to. Some are frustrating because of how you lost. And some are frustrating because of why you lost.

And tonight’s 100-91 to the Rockets is definitely the latter.

How does this sound? Twenty-three offensive rebounds and 19 more shot attempts. That’s what Houston had in their favor Sunday night. That’s the reason the Rockets won. The. Reason. Toss 19 Oklahoma City turnovers and 1-13 from 3 on top of that and you’ve got quite a recipe for a loss. The fact the Thunder only fell by nine is actually kind of impressive. The fact OKC hit almost 50 percent of its 75 shots is really the only reason it stayed close.

Here’s the thing: I’m not terribly upset about the loss. Sure, it’s an opportunity lost. Sure, it’s a game that when you look at the box score, you’ll see a glaring reason why the team lost. Sure, it’s a game that you feel like you should have and could have won. But the Rockets are no pushover team and Oklahoma City was playing with just nine healthy bodies. Key contributors missing: Nenad Krstic, Nick Collison and Kevin Ollie. And I have to think Krstic and Collison would have helped on the boards. Actually I don’t think, I know.

Still no excuse to lose though. You shouldn’t give up 23 offensive boards to a juco team. The missing players doesn’t excuse the poor defensive rotations, the turnovers and the missed shots. So while this loss doesn’t make me want to jump off a tall structure, it still leaves a bitter taste in my mouth. Such is the NBA season with a young team.

I’m not really into questioning Scott Brooks because I know he’s far smarter than I, but I have to wonder a little why he stuck with Serge Ibaka so much in the fourth quarter instead of the much more physical Etan Thomas. Heck, maybe even a little more D.J. White would have helped. He played three VERY quality minutes late in the second quarter. The fact is, something wasn’t working on the glass. It’s not like it was all Ibaka’s fault, but when you’re being dominated like that, a shake up might help. The fact Ibaka had just two rebounds really sticks out to me. At the same time, those were valuable minutes to a young talented guy that’s learning.

So while this loss doesn't make me want to jump off a tall structure, it still leaves a bitter taste in my mouth. Such is the NBA season with a young team.

The Thunder led 54-45 at the break, but was outscored by 18 in the second half. That doesn’t sound like the team we’ve seen so far this year. It wasn’t really like they were flat out of the locker room, but yet something was missing. Maybe if a few shots would have fallen or the snowball wouldn’t have grown on the glass, things would have been different. But the fact is, an undersized Rockets squard outboarded the Thunder 46-35, with HALF of those coming on the offensive end. I don’t know if that’s a tribute to the Rockets’ heart and desire on the glass or the Thunder’s indifference, but something was wrong there. Something.

Notes:

  • Houston did all that damage inside without Luis Scola who was injured on the game’s first play. Etan Thomas inadvertently caught Scola under the eye on a dunk and bloodied the Rocket power forward, causing him to miss the rest of the contest.
  • A couple 3-pointers drop for OKC and this thing is different. Jeff Green was an uncharacteristic 0-5. Durant 0-3. Westbrook 0-2. The team, 1-13. When Serge Ibaka hits your only 3-pointer of the game, you know it’s not going to be your night.
  • I really like D.J. White. He had eight points in three minutes. If you leave him open from 15 feet or under, he’s going to make it. Guaranteed. He just will.
  • Byron Mullens was on the bench. I guess he was called back up.
  • Kevin Durant was decent, scoring 25 on 10-19 shooting, grabbed nine rebounds and had six assists. It was a full line, but KD didn’t take a free throw until four minutes left in the third and only had five attempts for the game. He turned it over six times and was 0-3 from deep again. I don’t know where his 3-point shot has gone, but I’d like to have it back. So Kevin Durant’s 3-point shot, please come back.
  • Jeff Green had two fantastic dunks, but I feel like he’s got some blood on his hands for what happened on the glass. Carl Landry shouldn’t have 21 and 10 in 29 minutes. Green had 12 points and seven boards, but just couldn’t seem to take control in the paint. I love Uncle Jeff to death, but OKC really needed him and he just didn’t come up with anything.
  • Aaron Brooks is a terrific late game player. He’s awesome on the pick and roll and he can get to the rim with ease.
  • Sometimes it can really feel like OKC can score at will. Sometimes it seems like there is no way they can put the ball in the basket. I’m sure every NBA fan feels this at times with their team, but late in the fourth Sunday, it just felt like OKC really labored to find points.
  • David Anderson just bothers me. Maybe it’s his face or the gelled hair or his unathletic game, but he annoys me. Or maybe it’s because he had 12 huge points and really hurt the team I call my favorite.
  • I honestly don’t know if there is a better off-hand dunker than Jeff Green. He throws down lefthanded extremely well. It’s a skill.
  • I thought Russell Westbrook was really good Sunday. 8-16 from the floor for 20 points, five assists, four turnovers and two blocks. He really kind of kept OKC alive in the second half. He hit some jumpers, got to he basket and created as much as he could. Aaron Brooks scored on him some late, but honestly, when Brooks gets going he’s tough for ANYBODY to defend.

Losing at home shouldn’t be acceptable, but this is really the first time the Thunder’s been shorthanded this year. Not an excuse because that’s life in the NBA, but you have to think a healthy Collison or Krstic would have helped make a difference. It’s a loss that stings because this homestand had potential to be big for the Thunder – and I guess it still can – but just the fact of why the team lost is what’s most bothersome. Houston is a workhorse team, but you just shouldn’t give up 23 offensive boards to a team that starts a 6’6 center. For some reason, OKC just can’t match Houston’s energy and effort. I don’t know why. Still though, a 9-8 November isn’t something I saw coming. And I’ll gladly take it.

Next up is the 76ers Wednesday night.

Share:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • del.icio.us
  • Fark
  • StumbleUpon

Recap

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest

@kev

Well, if I follow your logic, if Sefolosha and Green are the solution, why isn't it being done? I'll tell you, because Sef can't score and because Green is already getting his minutes at four. There are absolutely minutes and a need for a scoring three behind Durant. It would mean cutting Durant back a bit, cutting back Sef and cutting back Green at the three. Deal with it guys, you are professionals.

It's really crazy to run that second unit (Colly, Etan, Harden and Ollie) with our biggest minute starter.

Kev it doesnt have to get this tight a system and don't feel you have to change but I throw it out there anyways for your consideration if you wish:

One thing you could check is how much the game's defense varies from league average Defensive efficiency. If it is 10 points up or down then net the opponent's offense or the Thunder defense appears to have been 5 baskets better or worse than average. If your defensive ratings are exactly +5 lower or -5 than this then it would be saying the defense was soley responsible for these less or more baskets. But since there can be good offensive plays that you might feel the defense shouldn't take "blame" for (and I agree there will be such plays) the amounts can vary but ideally they would vary by the amount of good offensive plays. If the difference between the game's Defensive efficiency and league average is bigger or smaller than your net Defensive score (total positives - total negatives) then there might be more or less defensive plays to grade as bad or good.

If you want. But your impressions without a real strict accounting system still has value.

I didn't see the first half, but from what I picked up Houston had been forced into putting up a lot of jumpers, which they missed. They appeared to make a great adjustment at the half--kudos to Adelman and the players for executing.
Lacking Kristic hurt. He opens up the middle for drives, which wasn't happening in the 2nd half. The Rockets effectively shut down the paint.
What does OKC do when the 3 isn't falling? They had no answer. I wanted to see them drive and get to the line (which wasn't happening enough at all). I also wanted to see some fouls on the defensive end. Time after time the Rockets got into the paint, and I don't remember one hard foul in the second half. Thomas should at least be good for that.
It looks like a good idea to try to force OKC into being a jump-shooting team (especially without Kristic). It was last year, and this continues to be a big issue on offense. We will never have an efficient offense if we continue to settle for the mid-range jumper.

One thing I noticed that hasn't been pointed out is Jeff Green's game. In the three games against Houston (including preseason), Jeff hasn't been himself. I was worried about this last night, and this is my conclusion.

Jeff Green has tried for half his NBA career to play the 4. His entire PJ tenure he played the 3. His matchup advantage has been his quickness, to get around the traditional 4's or draw them out to the 3 point line to open up the lane for someone else. It works wonders when he plays guys like Carlos Boozer. However, when he plays Houston, and every guy on that team other than Aaron Brooks is 6'6'' to 6'9'' and is as quick as he is, he loses his advantage. Ideally, he would go to his post-up game at that point, but he never did. Jeff took a few 3's where he was open enough, but he wasn't hitting. He tried to drive a few times and every once in a while he was successful. But you never saw him successful posting up in the low block.

Mostly what I'm trying to say is that it looks like Houston's personnel takes away Jeff's matchup advantage.

The same is kind of true for Russell. In the last game he posted Brooks up several times successfully, which caused Aaron to hit the bench so someone else could take that option away. But last night this wasn't explored much.

f5alcon :DJ white scored at will def deserves more minutes when we need points

YOu know why he only played three minutes I presume . . .

Collison's injury is a factor in Durant's minutes, in my opinion. It's pretty obvious that Brooks does not trust the anyone other than Green and Collison at the 4. With Nick out, that means more run for Jeff at the 4 and less time at the 3 to spell Durant. As much as we think he might be trade bait, Nick does have a role on the squad.

Vince :Yeah, I don’t think a backup 3 is really a pressing need here. We can very easily run a 9-man rotation with KD playing (for argument’s sake) 36 minutes a game with the other 12 going to Green — if we want to go big — or Sefalosha if we want to play a bit smaller. If you get a backup 3 his minutes are going to be coming from Ibaka, White, and Harden, not necessarily from KD. KD isn’t playing 45 minutes because we don’t have a backup 3; he’s playing 45 minutes because we don’t have (or Brooks hasn’t found) a unit without him in which Brooks has confidence.

agree . . . we don't need a backup three - We already need to find more minutes for Harden - having Thabo play more at the three (along with Green ) would do - Harden can even play there for 2-3 minutes if necessary . . .

Have to agree... but I think that with Ibaka's development, there is now more potential than before. By the end of the season, I think Brooks will have it figured out.... and there is always trade season right around the corner.

Yeah, I don't think a backup 3 is really a pressing need here. We can very easily run a 9-man rotation with KD playing (for argument's sake) 36 minutes a game with the other 12 going to Green -- if we want to go big -- or Sefalosha if we want to play a bit smaller. If you get a backup 3 his minutes are going to be coming from Ibaka, White, and Harden, not necessarily from KD. KD isn't playing 45 minutes because we don't have a backup 3; he's playing 45 minutes because we don't have (or Brooks hasn't found) a unit without him in which Brooks has confidence.

and the 3rd string SF is Sefolsha

@MartzMimic

Our second string SF is Uncle Jeff

@Joe
You're right. I think we've asked before who our second-string SF is. It causes me to be the NBA Live version of Scott Brooks and run KD out there 48 minutes every game.

I guess with Durant getting big big minutes, our scouting ought to focus on small forwards in the draft. We absolutely need somebody to come in and score from the three position both for the team sake and also so that Brooks can see that the fall off won't be catastrophic and actually sit Duarant a bit.

FWIW I really like Quincy Poindexter at Washington. Great shooter and very physical.

Re: Ibaka - he's SO young and SO talented. You live with the bad games while he's learning. No complaints here on his minutes last night.

DJ white scored at will def deserves more minutes when we need points

As I recall, in the loss in Houston, the Rockets killed the Thunder in transition. Oklahoma City was slow getting back and they took advantage of it. That wasn't the case last night as the Thunder seemed to get back on defense. I have to give Adelman and the players a lot of credit for adjusting.

@andrew
And Kobe also missed 6 weeks in the 1999-2000 season because of a hand injury. He didn't play anywhere close to 82 games at 41+ minutes a game that year. In fact Bryant didn't even play an 80 game year until the 2001-2002 season.

And I know Kobe was "known as" a defensive guy early on, but I can't say that Kobe gave 100% effort on both sides of the court when everyone who watched him back in his early days knows how off and on he was defensively prior to about three years ago (sure having Shaq down low might have played a part in that since Shaq would clean up and erase a lot of mistakes, but that just proves my point about him not having to expend as much energy on the defensive side as KD is having to...at least in my mind, haha). And we are talking about Kobe Bryant here. When he is the guy you're comparing ANYONE to, then it's a bit of a stretch, right?

And I still stand by the AI and Lebron comparisons as Kobe is, well, the exception to almost every NBA truism out there.

And Kev is right, it may have worked for Kobe and now works for Lebron, but it's painfully obvious that KD is getting tired and we can certainly say that KD doesn't have Kobe or Lebron's build to help absorb the wear and tear of 41+ minutes a game like they can.

I agree with Ibaka in the 3rd and 4th quarters. Thomas wasn't doing a great job securing the ball. At times I thought Thomas was playing volleyball.

I wish White played more minutes.

Interesting note about Mullen.

Crow :Kev, I tend to take your defensive evaluations as hitting most or all of the clearly good stuff and then the glaring bad but not necessarily all the sorta bad. You give out +30 and -6 in a game that arguably the defense lost.
I tend to think some of those extra offensive rebounds deserved -’s for the defender who should have prevented.And the inside shots and putbacks would add even more to the negative column, in my mind.

again, valid points Crow, and I looked at my numbers - two reasons why I stand by them

1) most of the offensive rebounds came off penetration, so you cant blame the bigs for not blocking out because their first responsibility is to stop layups . . .

2) perimeter guys almost NEVER block out . . .

I usually dont subtract points from guards for not blocking out because the perimeter guys almost never do it - I was shocked when I started looking closely . . .

and, +24 is still below average (season average before this game was 31 . . .

Only twice this season has a team given up more offensive rebounds. But there have been cases of as many as 37 in game during the last 20 years.

Kev, I tend to take your defensive evaluations as hitting most or all of the clearly good stuff and then the glaring bad but not necessarily all the sorta bad. You give out +30 and -6 in a game that arguably the defense lost.

I tend to think some of those extra offensive rebounds deserved -'s for the defender who should have prevented.
And the inside shots and putbacks would add even more to the negative column, in my mind.

My last thought: Does anyone else think that Houston's uniforms looked way too much like they were bought at McDonald's?

Keith, Valid points except that (like JG said) Durant is getting tired - maybe those other guys were better conditioned, but if Durant cant play 42 then you have to take him out, especially if you have a 10 pt lead in the first quarter . . .

@J.G.
Actually, Kobe started as a defensive guy who had to earn minutes by guarding guys like MJ. Also, while I imagine Durant is a bit fatigued by the end of games, that is more about conditioning than minutes. As andrew pointed out, superstar players tend to play a whole lot of minutes. In fact, it wasn't until more recently (last decade) that superstars are having their minutes limited. Jordan played 40 mpg over his first 4 full seasons. Bird and Magic averaged 38 mpg. And those were teams that ran way way faster than today's teams. 40 minutes on the Thunder is probably only as tiring as 35 minutes for the old Bulls, Lakers, or Celtics.

@J.G.

just to defend my comparisons a little.. Kobe was first team all nba defense in 99-00.. only his 4th year in the league.. and before he had a superstar reputation.. also in 2002-03 he was first team while averaging 41.5 minutes per game

@andrew
Watch the Rockets game again and look at the jumpshots KD took in the first quarter (when he was fresh) versus the shots he took in the second quarter (exhausted after playing 17 and a half straight minutes).

He went 4-6 in the first quarter; 0-3 in the second quarter.

Now he went 3-5 and 2-4 in the second half, but only one of those shots was out past the free throw line. All of the others were from 12 feet or even closer.

And while I understand the comparisons, AI was never known for his defense, Kobe only recently, Lebron only recently. Since Durant has jumped on the defensive bandwagon full force, those minutes WILL take a toll on him late in games or during periods of extended playing time and no rest.

But even with all of that, my fear is not for the games right now (though there is some) as much as it is for the rest of the 82 game schedule, and if we're lucky enough to make a playoff run.

oh and 3 of our 4 bench players have only played 38 games COMBINED..

J.G. :@Kev

Just to hammer home the point, Durant has topped 40 minutes in 10 of 16 games this season.
Why is he averaging only 38.7 minutes a game then?
Blowout losses. They skew the average. If you take out the blowout losses to Orlando and to the Lakers, you get a truly horrific average:
41.13 minutes a game.

I would first of all like to say that I do think we need to get Durant a little more rest some nights. However, I do not think it is the big deal some are making it out to be. I have no problem with Durant averaging 40-41 minutes a game. Allen Iverson had 7 seasons where he averaged over 42 minutes a game, including 2001-2002 when he averaged 43.5. Kobe has 5 seasons where he averaged over 40 minutes. Lebron averaged 42.4 in his SECOND season in the league and has 4 seasons of over 40 minutes a game. So while Durant is hard to compare with any of these 3(especially Iverson) it is definitely not unprecedented for a superstar player to average over 40 minutes a game. They are the best players on their team, and therefore it benefits the team to play them as much as they can without hurting performance. I personally have not noticed Durant losing lift on his jump shot late in games(He is missing 3's no matter when he shoots them). So to say that 41 minutes per game is a horrific average is a little bit of an exaggeration. Basically, I trust in Scotty and if he thinks Durant needs to play 45 minutes one night I am not going to second guess that. (Especially when we only have 9 players to use)

Start Harden Brooks!

Yeah, my mistake. It must have been that I was surprised to see him still on the floor when the starters came back in the second quarter. Apparently he goes out with 2 or 3 minutes gone in the 2nd most nights.

andrew :@spike
Don’t they usually leave Durant in to start the 2nd and play him with the bench? and then he goes out and a few starters come back in with like 8ish minutes left in quarter?

Andrew is correct . . .

After seeing Ibaka get more minutes it is funny to remember everyone around here freaking out about starting Ibaka after the Lakers game. I think he is going to be a good player in time, but he will probably be inconsistent this year. I think that this year will consist of a Krstic, Thomas, Collison, Ibaka, White rotation that will be based on match-ups and who is playing well. We should get used to the big man carousel because it's going to continue.

@spike

Don't they usually leave Durant in to start the 2nd and play him with the bench? and then he goes out and a few starters come back in with like 8ish minutes left in quarter?

Yeah, I was shocked to see that Durant didn't go on his normal pattern and be subbed out to start the 2nd.

Regarding the offensive rebounds, it really was amazing how many outside shots were so terrible, the rebound was so unpredictable and it bounced outside to a Houston guard. Lots of that. Then, a lot of Carly Landry and Chuck Hayes being Carl Landry and Chuck Hayes. Those guys are playing heavy minutes for a 9-8 team, so it's not like they're not good basketball players.

The Rockets are just a tough match up because they always play so smart and it seems like they have a way of shaking the confidence of the Thunder players somehow. It's like they take on Battier's personality or something.

A frustrating game because it felt like the Thunder were the better team, but the ball just kept bouncing the wrong way.

Scott Brooks has little trust in the team without KD because the team is bad without KD, at least this season.

J.G. :@Kev Just to hammer home the point, Durant has topped 40 minutes in 10 of 16 games this season.
Why is he averaging only 38.7 minutes a game then?
Blowout losses. They skew the average. If you take out the blowout losses to Orlando and to the Lakers, you get a truly horrific average:
41.13 minutes a game.

sad . . . I am rewatching the game - we were up 26-16 in the 1st - perfect time to take Durant out earlier than usual . . .

@Kev
Just to hammer home the point, Durant has topped 40 minutes in 10 of 16 games this season.

Why is he averaging only 38.7 minutes a game then?

Blowout losses. They skew the average. If you take out the blowout losses to Orlando and to the Lakers, you get a truly horrific average:

41.13 minutes a game.

@dylan

o my.... denver was up 40-25 after the first quarter and they lost!! to minnesota of all teams... the clippers came back from 21 today to win too... strange day

dylan :At least we didn’t lose at home to Minnesota like Denver just did

WOW. I just watched Minnesota get destroyed by Phoenic two nights ago. So much for Denver being "an elite team" (words from superstar J R Smith).

J.G. :@justin To piggyback on this, I also don’t think he’s as bad of a 3 pt shooter as he’s shown, but a part of me wonders how sturdy his legs are going to be when he doesn’t sub out until the 6:35 minute mark of the second quarter. Yes, that’s right folks. 17:25 until his first sub-out and a LUDICROUS 45 minutes played.
I know Kev is with me on this one, but it’s getting to the point to where I honestly don’t know what Brooks is thinking with regards to KD’s minutes, ESPECIALLY with him expending so much effort on the defensive end now (Hallelujah!).
I was not at all surprised to see Durant struggling with his jumper so much in the second half. It was inevitable.

Amen.

We have been talking about this forever. You can read between the lines: Brooks has little trust without his Ace. Brooks has to go over that. We did go 5-2 last year without Durant, so having play 37-39 minutes instead of 45 isnt asking for too much. Does Durant EVER come out in the first quarter? (Foul trouble doesn't count) NO I don't think so.

Kev :
Overall, despite what people think, we lost to a good team. I dont mind losing to Houston, it’s the bad losses (see the LA Clippers) that bother me . . .

True... Houston seems to just be one of those tough match ups for them... oh well, it's a long season.

At least we didn't lose at home to Minnesota like Denver just did

@justin
To piggyback on this, I also don't think he's as bad of a 3 pt shooter as he's shown, but a part of me wonders how sturdy his legs are going to be when he doesn't sub out until the 6:35 minute mark of the second quarter. Yes, that's right folks. 17:25 until his first sub-out and a LUDICROUS 45 minutes played.

I know Kev is with me on this one, but it's getting to the point to where I honestly don't know what Brooks is thinking with regards to KD's minutes, ESPECIALLY with him expending so much effort on the defensive end now (Hallelujah!).

I was not at all surprised to see Durant struggling with his jumper so much in the second half. It was inevitable.

Regarding Kevin Durant's three pointer, many people felt that the 40+% 3pt shot he displayed last season was something of a fluke since he was in the 20's in his rookie year. Even Dirk Nowitzki, a player similar to Durant at least offensively, shoots the three only about 35+ most years. I don't think KD is as bad as he's shown from 3pt range but I don't think he's a 40+ shooter either. 35% sounds about right for him.

Overall, despite what people think, we lost to a good team. I dont mind losing to Houston, it's the bad losses (see the LA Clippers) that bother me . . .

I think Scott pushed the right buttons - I have no problem with Ibaka in the game in the 4th . . .

B-RY :I’ve also noticed a trend with Ibaka.
Because he is given the task of protecting the rim, he get’s himself out of position after leaping for the block. I’ve seen it in every game he has played. He leaps out of the building for a block then loses a shot at the rebound and is out of the position to contest the next shot.
I’m not sure what you do to remedy the problem, but he is getting exploited.

Blame the penetration off the pick and roll, it's either that or watch the guy score a layup .

I have to go against the grain guarding DJ - has he ever played an important minute for the Thunder? Scott doesn't trust him on the defensive end, and based on DJ's performance, he's justified in not trusting him.

Defensive Discussion

There is a big uproar over Houston’s work on the glass, and rightfully so. But part of the problem is Houston’s design. They gave us a heavy dose of pick and roll with speedy Aaron Brooks out top. I bet there aren’t two guys in the NBA that are quicker with the ball. I’m not blaming Russell – he actually didn’t have a bad defensive game. But when you have to rotate help after the pick (Aaron Brooks was getting around the hedge guy easily) then those help guys are NOT in a position to block out; not that a lot of blocking out goes on in the NBA anyway (especially outside). Anyway, we were too busy helping, and Houston knows how to feast on the missed shots. The solution? We have to do a better job out top with BOTH defenders on the pick and roll. Of course, that’s easier said than done.

Defensive Dominator – Kevin Durant (+16)

Yes, I said it: Dominator! This was the second highest total this year for the Thunder (Thabo had a +23 in the November 3rd contest vs. the Lakers).

First of all, only ONE mistake. In the first quarter, Aaron Brooks got loose on a pick and roll out top. Serge Ibaka AND Jeff Green rightfully came to the rescue and cut off Aaron. Durant was the third guy, he took a step inside and didn’t trust his teammates to take care of Brooks; you can’t do that if you are guarding a sharpshooter, and Shane Battier made him paid for it. Battier hit a three while Durant attempted to recover.

That was it for the bad – Durant filled up my scoresheet with great plays. He had three blocks: one on Trevor Ariza inside, one on Kyle Lowry outside, and a serious rejection on Chase Budinger that sent the ball out of bounds! He also had three deflections, one of which Mike Wilks scooped up.

In the last seven games, Durant has a total of fifty-five defensive points, which is basically a (+8) average. That matches Thabo’s average for the season. In the previous seven games, he was averaging (+4). I am proud of Kevin for being more CONSISTENT with his effort. Too bad this sterling effort came in a loss.

James Harden (+5)

Of all the perimeter defenders, Harden is the most consistent. I just praised Durant for his constant effort, but Durant’s length and height aids him in scoring (defensively) high on lots of nights. Harden’s season scores don’t show a lot of stellar efforts, but on the flipside, he only has one negative score. (I didn’t officially keep score the first game of the season when he was embarrassed). Tonight, he had two steals, a deflection, and he picked up a loose ball. He also had two mistakes.

Serge Ibaka (+5)

A solid night for Serge. Among his positives: He drew a charge on Carl Landry. I am sure Nick Collison was smiling form the bench.

Mike Wilks (+2)

Russell Westbrook (+2)

One of the defensive plays of the night came when Russell had a POWERSTUFF of rookie Jermaine Taylor! Taylor had only played a total of fourteen minutes before today’s game. Welcome to the NBA rookie!

Jeff Green (zero)

DJ White (zero)

Etan Thomas (-1)

The way Etan started, I figured he would score better, but he was guarding forwards all night, and he had trouble staying with them.

Thabo Sefolosha (-5)

Thabo is my favorite Thunder player, as most of you are already aware. Still, I have to call him out when he has a bad game. He made way too many mistakes – hence his putrid score (for him anyway). I counted six. Five of them were against Trevor Ariza. Three of those five occured when Sefolosha was ball-watching, and he lost sight of his man. Those three mistakes accounted for seven points. If you ask him, he will say he was trying to help out his team, but you can’t sleep on Trevor.

The sixth mistake came in the second half when he was guarding Carl Landry. Maybe Brooks was getting tired of watching Thabo get schooled by Trevor, so he put Durant on him. Imagine that, Durant getting called to the defensive rescue! Don’t laugh, I think that actually happened. I really think it was a good move, because Durant did bother Trevor with his length. But the Thunder paid for it on the other end. In the 4th quarter, Landry, who has a good post game, took undersized Thabo right to the block. Often, when guards are trying to defend post players, they front the man to attempt to deter the pass. The problem: if the pass is completed over their head, it’s an easy layup or dunk. Knowing this, the Thunder properly rotated help on the backside of Landry after the pass was successfully completed. However, the ball was rotated around, and rookie Chase Budinger knocked down an open three. Thabo was probably following orders to front Landry, but, as you can see, this put too much strain on the help defense.