Home > Commentary > Let me tell you how it’s all going to play out

Let me tell you how it’s all going to play out

The schedule came out last week and since there’s not a whole heck of a lot happening right now, why not aimlessly predict stuff? For the record, whatever number I wind up with isn’t the “official” prediction for this season’s win total, just more what I settled on right now. Feel free to add your own and tell me how wrong I am. I’m going to break this down in increments. I wouldn’t dream about doing it game-by-game because that’s FreeDarko’s thing, and they do an awesome, hilarious job of it. So put on your predicting hats and let’s get dangerous.

October 28 – November 15 (Sacramento, @Detroit, Portland, LA Lakers, @Houston, Orlando, @Sacramento, @LA Clippers, @San Antonio, LA Clippers)

The season starts with an incredibly tough stretch of games. We’ve talked about it a little before, but these first 10-15 games are going to tell us a lot about this team. The Thunder could start the season out 2-8 very easily. The best I think OKC can come out of these first 10 is 5-5. And if that happens, that would be a HUGE victory and I think really good things would be in store for this team. That would mean they’re beating teams they should, winning on the road and maybe even beating teams they shouldn’t. They’d be set up to possibly be over .500 in their first 20 because the next 10 aren’t as tough. But I don’t think 5-5 is really that realistic. Five road games, six games against 2009 playoff teams and two back-to-backs. Too tough for a team that’s going to take a little time to gel.

Prediction: 4-6
Record through 10: 4-6

Nov. 17 – Dec. 18 (@Miami, @Orlando, Washington, @LA Lakers, @Utah, Milwaukee, Houston, Philadelphia, Boston, Golden State, @Memphis, Cleveland, @Denver, Dallas, Detroit)

Fifteen games for the Thunder leading up to a difficult Christmas time stretch. There’s some tough games in this run, but the good news is that nine of the 15 are at home. With this squad, I’m not ready to call anything a certain win, because they’re not there yet. But there’s clearly some games that OKC should win. The five-game homestand right in the middle is big because that’s a chance to win some games.

Prediction: 6-9
Record through 25: 10-15

Dec. 19 – Jan. 23 (@Houston, @LA Lakers, @ Phoenix, Charlotte, @New Jersey, @Washington, Utah, @Milwaukee, @Chicago, New Orleans, Indiana, New York, San Antonio, @Dallas, Miami, @Atlanta, @Minnesota, @Memphis, @Cleveland)

Keep in mind, at the turn of the year last season, OKC was 4-29. This year, the team should be looking at a record of something like 14-18 or something like that. Well, that’s if things are going about as we expect. This stretch has the Thunder’s only four-game road trip, as well as a few games against contenders. But overall, it’s not too tough. Of the 19 games, 12 are on the road. So while the opponents aren’t ridiculously difficult, the fact that OKC is on the road is (remember, the Thunder was just 8-33 away from home last year).

Prediction: 7-12
Record through 44: 17-27

Jan. 27 – Feb. 28 (Chicago, Denver, Golden State, Atlanta, @New Orleans, @Golden State, @Portland, Dallas, @New York, @Minnesota, Phoenix, @San Antonio, Minnesota, Toronto)

So we’re just a few games past the mid-point and the Thunder’s 10 games under. Through 44 games last year, OKC was 9-35. Success, amirite? The first half of the season is much more difficult than the second and while the playoffs might not be a real possibility at this point, the second half sets up to win some games. February is an easier run and there’s a chance to get somewhat near .500 again.

Prediction: 10-4
Record through 58: 27-31

March 2 – March 21 (Sacramento, @Denver, @LA Clippers, @Sacramento, New Orleans, New Jersey, Utah, @Charlotte, @Toronto, @Indiana)

Two three-game road trips could kill any playoff hope that was built in February. It’s not like there’s a bunch of killer games, but there’s back-to-backs and games on the road – things OKC doesn’t do well. These 10 games look easy on paper, but in reality they won’t be. Going 5-5 would be excellent, but there’s bound to be some rough patches and losing streaks this season. This looks like it could be one of those areas. But the key is, instead of losing 10 straight, get a win here or there and break it up. That’s (hopefully) one of the differences between this year and last.

Prediction: 2-8
Record through 68: 29-39

March 22 – April 14 (San Antonio, Houston, LA Lakers, Portland, @Philadelphia, @Boston, @Dallas, Minnesota, @Utah, Denver, Phoenix, @Golden State, @Portland, Memphis)

Time to finish the race. After a poor streak of games in their last 10, the Thunder comes home against some tough opponents. Other teams are battling for playoff positions and seeding, while the Thunder’s trying to put a cap on an improved season and build momentum for a run next year. Eight of the Thunder’s last 14 are at home, giving OKC a chance to close on a good note. And a good note would be not falling on their faces and crawling to the finish line. Beating a contender or two, winning some on the road and taking care of business at home would be an excellent way to close the season.

Prediction: 6-8
Record after 82: 35-47

So after all this, we end up with 35 wins. To me, that sounds just about right. We can get high, possibly unrealistic hopes of 40-plus wins, but that’s based on Russell Westbrook taking a huge leap and James Harden being The Piece that was missing. It’s possible, and I’m not saying it won’t happen, because Lord knows I’d love for it to, but we can’t get ahead of ourselves and caught up in the hype. You can’t forget that this team is one of the youngest in the league and that there’s no huge rush to make this happen now. Thirty-five wins is right on pace and puts the Thunder in prime position to get in the playoff hunt for 2010-11. Which is exactly the plan.

Share:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • del.icio.us
  • Fark
  • StumbleUpon

Commentary ,

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest

Oops, sorry about that. I thought I canceled the first post before it went through.

@VisitingClipsFan.

Ha! I forget that you read the comments on this blog. I was going to make a crack about Sebastian Telfair ruining any good basketball karma you had built up by roster swapping Griffin for Randolph, but I'm gearing up for my new basketball year's resolution of NOT picking on you guys relentlessly, since Bill Simmons has that market cornered, and I know how that feels.

@VisitingClipsFan.

Ha! I forget that you read the comments on this blog. I was going to make a crack about Sebastian Telfair ruining any good basketball karma you had built up by roster swapping Griffin for Randolph, but I'm gearing up for my new basketball year's resolution of picking on you guys relentlessly, since Bill Simmons has that market cornered.

I just ran a projection on the new NBA season (rather rough, mind you), and I got OKC as the 23rd best team, with a final record of 37-45. Cleveland shows as the best team; Portland is #2, Orlando #3.

Using the segments Royce did:
5-5 (stealing one)
7-8
7-12
7-7 (Feb--much worse... I rate those tougher)
5-5 (early March--much better... I rate those easier)
6-8
-----
37-45

Jax Raging Bile Duct :@Nix

I think the Timberwolves, Bucks, Nets, and 76ers will be worse.
Agreed that the Clippers will be better. They pulled the best roster move of the year by adding Griffin and subtracting Randoph, so they’ll be better, but they’re still the Clippers.
The four teams I can’t pin down yet are Houston, Detroit, Sacremento and Memphis. Houston seems to have made a reputation for themselves by playing well without their star players, but I just can’t say. Detroit did some major overhauling, and I just can’t imagine Gordon and Villanueva fitting in with Detroit basketball, but they also have a new coach, so we’ll see. And by my last count, Memphis has one guy who plays defense, and he’s a rookie. There won’t be enough shots to go around, and I’m putting money on this being the worst ball moving team in the NBA this year. It just seems like everyone on that roster is a ball stopper. Sacremento is still rebuilding, adding talent and didn’t lose any one of significance. But I’m not sure Evans and Casspi produce substantial wins in their first year.

Yet we were still 3-1 vs. you guys last year with a much inferior squad. :p

Nice write up, Royce. Here's my take. They finished 20-30. They added Harden who is the real deal. Krstic improves with a training camp. Durant, Green & Westbrook all get a lot better just because they're more experienced. Brooks will be a better coach with eperience & a training camp. This team will have improved as much or more than any other team in the league. Winning half their games & competing for that last playoff spot is completely realistic.

@Joe
Except when it comes to the playoffs, when in a 7 game series, the best team almost always wins.

I think 30 games is on the low end, barring a major injury to one of the big three. Bear in mind that we played the last 50 games at a 31-win clip. I'm admittedly a homer but I'd put the over/under at 38 games. I also think the 8 seed is going to come down to us, Phoenix, Houston, and Golden State. If Phoenix and Houston regress as expected, I still say we can be talking up an outside shot at the 8 seed into March. But again, I'm a giant homer.

@Joe
Right on. Sports aren't fun if you know what's going to happen. They're the best reality show out there.

Optimism is good. It's what makes me smile at the beginning of every season when the team is still at .500 (0-0).

I want to relate one little gem from a few seasons ago. On opening night of the 04-05 season the Sonics, got humiliated by the Clippers by 30 points 84-114. It was devastating. I thought it was a real good indication that the team was going to suck bad. The team took it to heart and rattled off 9 straight wins, and only lost two more games in their first 20. They finished with 52 wins and went to the second round of the playoffs.

All I am saying here is that it seldom goes the way you think it will. Big surprises ahead and that's what makes the game great. If it was a foregone conclusion, who would want that?

Worst case scenario, I see this team winning 25-29 games. I just think there's too much talent to be as bad as last year. We can get hung on 23 wins, but the fact they played so much better in 2009 is really encouraging.

Again, not that I'm bitter...

@MartzMimic

This one guy, ALL BY HIMSELF, caused Durant to miss like three free throws in a row. It was real quite and he kept yelling "Brick" at the top of his lungs at just the right moment. He was so effen loud that the entire visiting side of the arena was getting pissed off. He eventually left because people started getting hostile.

I wish I could remember what team it was, but what a jerk. It's a lot different when you have several thousand people making random noise. But when it's quite, and one loud person can be heard through the whole statium, its just different.

And since my seats last year were down low in the corner by the visiting lockeroom entrance, I always got bombarded by visiting fans who would come down and stand in the ailse and lean over the rail and spill people's drinks. And the Lakers and Celtics fans were by FAR the worst.

@Bryan
I certainly agree about Lakers fans, but I thought the Celtics' fans were worse. And the worst single fan I saw was a Nuggets fan.

Agreed on who you can't figure out...but I def put Memphis on a should/sure win list.

and add Indiana to a can't figure out list. What are they trying to accomplish?

I don't care how the season goes, if they can just beat the damn lakers. Worst NBA fans in the league in my opinion. They take over the Ford Center and act like a bunch of drunkin @holes who's parents never taught them any manors. But I'm not bitter.

@Nix

I think the Timberwolves, Bucks, Nets, and 76ers will be worse.

Agreed that the Clippers will be better. They pulled the best roster move of the year by adding Griffin and subtracting Randoph, so they'll be better, but they're still the Clippers.

The four teams I can't pin down yet are Houston, Detroit, Sacremento and Memphis. Houston seems to have made a reputation for themselves by playing well without their star players, but I just can't say. Detroit did some major overhauling, and I just can't imagine Gordon and Villanueva fitting in with Detroit basketball, but they also have a new coach, so we'll see. And by my last count, Memphis has one guy who plays defense, and he's a rookie. There won't be enough shots to go around, and I'm putting money on this being the worst ball moving team in the NBA this year. It just seems like everyone on that roster is a ball stopper. Sacremento is still rebuilding, adding talent and didn't lose any one of significance. But I'm not sure Evans and Casspi produce substantial wins in their first year.

Looking at the schedule I keep thinking of all the teams that should be better this year then last.

Washington- Healthy and better
LA Clippers- Health and Blake Griffin

There are a couple of spots I would have been a bit more optimistic & some I would have given more loses, but agree with the ending total.

In that first 10 game stretch, I see 3-5 five wins. They have a pair of two game series against the Kings and the Clippers. They should be able to win at least 2 of those games, perhaps 3. They could also pick off ONE of the Detroit, Houston or Portland games.

So I'm thinking 4 and 6 as well, with 3 wins out of the two Kings/Clippers series and another versus the remaining teams.

I like the expectations. As long as there is a plan to move forward, I can wait for things to happen.

Trackbacks

  1. [...] happen, the Thunder would have to go 23-39 the rest of the way. Do you really see that happening? I saw the team being 10-15 through 25 games. Now that that’s impossible, I think MAYBE we should all start raising our expectations a [...]

  2. [...] did this last season around this time because reckless speculation and postulation is always good fun mid-August. I felt like last year I [...]