Home > Bolts > Tuesday Bolts – 6.23.09

Tuesday Bolts – 6.23.09

Don’t forget to send in your submission for the Daily Thunder MockTest. Winner gets an autographed copy of thunderbolt2316Strong and Handsome: The Royce Young Story.

Eddie Sefko of the Dallas Morning News on the draft’s swingmen: “Either way, it may well describe James Harden, the Arizona State shooting guard who may or may not be the second player chosen in Thursday night’s NBA draft. He most certainly is in the conversation when it comes to figuring out who goes directly after Blake Griffin. “He’s a ready-made, step-in NBA contributor,” Mavericks president of basketball operations Donnie Nelson said. And there just aren’t many of those in this draft. In fact, Harden may be the only one at the swing positions – shooting guard and small forward.”

Taylor Griffin was “drafted” to play with the Harlem Globetrotters. I really have no idea what that means or if he’s actually a Globetrotter now, but that’s what happened: “The world-famous Harlem Globetrotters today selected University of Oklahoma senior forward Taylor Griffin as the top pick in the team’s third annual player draft, just days before his younger brother, and Sooners teammate, Blake Griffin is expected to become the number one overall selection of the upcoming NBA Draft on June 25.”

NBA.com has put together a consensus mock draft using all of the most reputable sites: OKC is taking either Hasheem Thabeet or Ricky Rubio (tie). James Harden goes fifth the Washington.

Scott Howard-Cooper with info on the Grizzlies situation: “The growing league-wide sentiment is that the Grizzlies won’t select Rubio, but by their own choice rather than being scared off. Adding size is simply more pressing and Conley still has promise. Trading out of the spot is possible. If not, Connecticut center Hasheem Thabeet is the logical choice. “That’s who they’re taking,” a rival personnel boss said. “The rest is smoke. Bet on it.”

It really sounds like the Grizzlies are taking Thabeet: “The Thunder weren’t the only team to meet with Thabeet in LA this weekend. The Grizzlies, after being snubbed by Thabeet in their workout, flew to LA and met with him for three hours. Sources close to both Thabeet and the Grizzlies expect Memphis to take him at No. 2. If they don’t, chances are they have a trade in the works.”

Rubio worked out for the Kings: “Ricky Rubio’s second Sacramento visit was much like his first, a covert operation that was seen as mysterious and methodical by some, maddening and manipulative by others. But there was one significant difference this time around: he worked out…While the session remained secret at the request of his representatives, he told The Bee it was a necessary exercise that hardly showcased his game. ‘It’s difficult to show them what I have to do on the court, because there are no teammates and nobody there,’ Rubio said at the Sacramento airport just before leaving town. ‘I can’t show them what I do on the court. This workout is not my style. I need my teammates around me to play basketball. I was alone.’”

Matt Moore of Hardwood Paroxysm on Rubio and the Grizz: “Rubio has the potential to be a game-changer (so to speak) for certain teams. New York. Minnesota. Even the Clippers though Dunleavy will give up Griffin over his cold, dead body. Or if you offer a bloated contract with little to no value, apparently, since that’s been all their other moves. Rubio could be a true facillitator for the Wizards, a franchise player for the Kings, the next evolution for the Warriors, or the Nash Toronto wants but can’t have. But to Memphis? He’s a pain the ass that may decide to play chicken with them; a player that won’t sell as many tickets as other players can (we’ve seen the way Memphis gets attached to awkward looking Spanish dudes), doesn’t provide them an inside scorer, makes their investment in Mike Conley seem completely vapid, and generally is a terrible fit.”

The Clippers aren’t budging: “The Clippers remain intent on keeping the No. 1 pick in the NBA draft, and they’re expected to make Oklahoma’s Blake Griffin the top selection. “The pick’s not going anywhere,” assistant general manager Neil Olshey said yesterday. Coach and general manager Mike Dunleavy said he hasn’t spoken to anyone seriously about trading the pick in more than two weeks. He and Olshey haven’t ruled out the possibility of acquiring another pick on or before Thursday’s draft.”

The Thunder will work out five players today: “Thunder just announced a five-player workout for today that includes Arizona’s Chase Budinger, Memphis’ Antonio Anderson, Temple’s Dionte Christmas, LSU’s Garrett Temple and Villanova’s Dwyane Anderson. It’s the second workout for Christmas, which is interesting because the Thunder doesn’t currently have a second-round pick and the No. 25 is considered way too high to draft him. I did have Christmas as a potential sleeper, though. Maybe the Thunder would like to trade into the second round and grab him, or even do a post-draft trade similar to the Kyle Weaver acquisition and bring him in.”

The Baseline’s mock: “Oklahoma City Thunder: Hasheem Thabeet. If things worked out so Thabeet slipped to No. 3 and the Thunder weren’t moving up to No. 2 to get Rubio, he’d be a great pickup, giving them a much needed interior presence.”

Empty the Bench looks at players that will be better than expected and players that will be worse. Worse – Hasheem Thabeet: ”For someone who is so big (7-3, 265) and has such good numbers, he sure didn’t seem to show up very often versus good teams. Against Pitt, Michigan State, Gonzaga, Georgetown, and Villanova, Thabeet averaged 9.8 points and 5.8 rebounds. Huh? Bring on Buffalo, Seton Hall, Western Carolina, or Chattanooga, though, and it’s back to domination. There’s no doubt he’ll get his blocks at the next level, but Thabeet gets tired too quickly when challenged, disappears for huge chunks of games, and his offensive repertoire makes Dwight Howard look like Hakeem Olajuwon.”

Blake Griffin is the NCAA 2010 cover boy: “Yeah, the market out there is great. And I’ve already been able to partner with a lot of great companies. You know, partnering with EA Sports and being on the cover of NCAA 10 is very exciting. And to be on the list of guys who have been on the cover before me is exciting. And I definitely think LA will help with that and the marketing standpoint.”

FanHouse previews the draft for teams in the Northwest Division: “There are some who believe the Thunder are onto something big here, with three-fifths of their starting lineup in place for the foreseeable future: Russell Westbrook, Kevin Durant and Jeff Green. All that leaves is center and shooting guard, and since shooting guard is considered one of the easier positions to fill, there’s a lot to like about Hasheem Thabeet here.”

Draft Express does the same: “The Thunder’s most significant need lies in the post, where the previous regime drafted unsuccessfully in the past. They are due for an upgrade at either the power forward or center positions. With the third pick in the draft, they can take their pick of this year’s top, draft-eligible big men, particularly a more defensively oriented player. They may opt to shore up their backcourt somewhat, though, adding another playmaker and perimeter shooter who is willing to play unselfishly within the team’s existing pieces. With their late first round pick, they can find another solid player to bring off of their bench and deepen their frontcourt rotation.”

UPDATE: Chad Ford reports a major trade happening with Richard Jefferson going to San Antonio for Bruce Bowen, Fabricio Oberto and Kurt Thomas.

Share:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • del.icio.us
  • Fark
  • StumbleUpon

Bolts

  1. Royce
    June 23rd, 2009 at 13:38 | #1

    @Dustin
    Vince Carter I believe. Tyson Chandler was and probably still is. Baron Davis, Marcus Camby and Zach Randolph, though those three may not entirely be financial reasons.

    I’m trying to think of more.

  2. J.G.
    June 23rd, 2009 at 13:45 | #2

    @Clark Matthews
    I know, but my point is that the Thunder will never be under the cap enough for an excess of $10 million dollars to work in a trade like that. The Denver/Clippers example is a perfect one to use because it was so unbelievably preposterous.

    Also, the Thunder have a -$7.5 million worth of cap space right now, and with Malik’s, Swift’s and Mason’s expiring contracts only equaling around $15 mil, even if you toss in Johan Petro’s trade exception, the Thunder still don’t have that $10 million extra dollars to eat that cap space come July without sending someone else to the Bucks with a significant contract…unless of course they wanted to completely handcuff themselves for the next 3 years.

    If a team has $15 million dollars in cap space just hanging around, their GM is not doing his job.

  3. J.G.
    June 23rd, 2009 at 13:46 | #3

    @Royce
    Don’t forget Chris Kaman, too.

    Or in other words, 3-4 of the Clippers starting five. :)

  4. J.G.
    June 23rd, 2009 at 13:50 | #4

    @Clark Matthews
    Looking back, I didn’t do as good a job as I could have explaining the cap space scenario so I do appreciate you pointing that out since it may have caused confusion.

  5. Keith
    June 23rd, 2009 at 13:57 | #5

    I heard rumors of Josh Smith, everyone on the Knicks, Gerald Wallace, Antwan Jamison, Shaq, and Tracy McGrady also.

    @J.G.
    http://hoopshype.com/salaries/oklahoma_city.htm
    According to that we have roughly 41 million committed to players next year. That means on July 1st, we will have somewhere between 14 and 20 million in cap space. The issue is that we are still paying for people we don’t have. We bought out Joe Smith’s 4.8 million, but it still counts against the cap. We waived Donyell Marshall and his 6 million, but were still on the hook for his salary this year. In the NBA, every contract is guaranteed, so teams are responsible for their contracts even if they get rid of the player.

  6. Keith
    June 23rd, 2009 at 14:00 | #6

    I should clarify that teams are only responsible for contracts that they buy out or waive. They obviously aren’t responsible for contracts that are traded.

  7. J.G.
    June 23rd, 2009 at 14:05 | #7

    @Keith
    Okay, first off, I’m totally with you and Clark on this whole cap space thing, but that site is an inaccurate representation of the Thunder’s salaries because they inked Livingston to a longer deal through 2009-2010 for a little under $1 million over the next two years. Why that is important is because, and here’s what I don’t think most people are factoring in, the salary cap WILL BE LOWER next year.

    Secondly, factor in the cost of a guaranteed top 3 pick, a 25th pick, the potential of Serge Ibaka coming over into the roster and I just don’t think that $14 million will hold up, looking more and more like $8-9 until the summer of 2010.

    I guess I’m just more pessimistic than others regarding cap space or I just try to find every little thing that could lower it.

  8. J.G.
    June 23rd, 2009 at 14:11 | #8

    @Keith
    The third pick makes something like $3.9 million dollars guaranteed (basically $4 mil off of our cap space next year).

    Oh yeah, Durant, Green, Krstic, Watson, Westbrook, DJ White, Chucky Atkins and DEFINITELY Thabo (at just over $800,000) all get bumps in their salaries next year, adding up to around an extra $2.725 million dollars off our cap.

    Toss in the $800,000 that the 25th pick would make and that’s about $7.5 to $8 million extra dollars that we’ll see next year off our cap.

  9. J.G.
    June 23rd, 2009 at 14:21 | #9

    Okay, crunched numbers and as of right now, with the cost of the third pick, the 25th pick and the bumps in salaries, the Oklahoma City Thunder’s salary for next year, without adding any other players, will be $50 million dollars.

    The projected salary cap for next year is $57.3 million.

    That’s only $7.3 million in cap space, not the $10 million or $14-20 million everyone seems to think we’ll have. Tack on the Ibaka possibility at atleast $1.25 million a year and a potential free agent acquisition and…well, um, yeah.

  10. Dustin
    June 23rd, 2009 at 14:27 | #10

    @ J.G.
    Thanks for all the great information.
    I forget who would you like the Thunder to draft?

  11. okiefunk
    June 23rd, 2009 at 14:30 | #11

    This may just be “okie voodoo” but did anyone else notice that the picture of KD, Westbrook and Green next to Trammel’s article was from the OU vs DAVIDSON game??? Davidson where Stephen CURRY plays!?! Is Barry trying to tell us something?

    *Or perhaps I am spending way, WAY too much time looking for hidden meanings and astral signs!

  12. MartzMimic
    June 23rd, 2009 at 14:35 | #12

    I was looking on HoopsHype and found this comment in a blip from ESPN.com talking about the Bucks-Spurs trade:

    “I understand why they did that. They have a few years left of Tim Duncan’s career, and it’s going to take a lot of improvement to win the West – the Lakers are far better at this point, and new threats like the Nuggets, Blazers and Thunder are entering the scene.”

  13. Dustin
    June 23rd, 2009 at 14:42 | #13

    New BS report with Chad Ford talking about the draft, trades, etc.

    Starts talking about the Thunder @ 21 minutes or so.

    Simmons loves the idea of Rubio and Westbrook in the backcourt together.

  14. Royce
    June 23rd, 2009 at 14:43 | #14

    @Dustin
    Nice find. Thanks.

  15. June 23rd, 2009 at 14:55 | #15

    Simmons and Ford have actually switched me over to the Rubio camp — they were very much pro-Rubio in general at #3.

    Ford’s point (which is too simple and smart for me to have come up with on my own) is that when you have Rubio, Westbrook, KD, and Green — basically 4 of the best 15 or so players to have come out in the last three years — you let the on-court issues about positions and the like work themselves out. Simmons’ point was that he would watch every single game if those 4 guys were on the same team. Great points, I’m sold. Rubio at 3!

  16. J.G.
    June 23rd, 2009 at 15:14 | #16

    @Dustin
    Wow, I definitely didn’t see Simmons warming to the idea of Rubio and Westbrook in the same backcourt. Great heads up.

  17. J.G.
    June 23rd, 2009 at 15:18 | #17

    @J.G.
    Oh, sorry I forgot to answer your question. I’m intrigued by Rubio and have been warming to the idea of him and RW in the same backcourt…but I’d say in a perfect world, if RW is the point guard of the future, I think you trade down from #3 and get Harden along with some assets, who I’m very high on and have been for awhile.

    But it’s just so up in the air, who knows? You know?

  18. Crow
    June 25th, 2009 at 00:29 | #18

    If it is Rubio-Westbrook at least it is two above average size guys. That is the way to do it.

    Lots of the 2 small PG lineups last a year then you look at the +/- and there are generally blah to terrible and eventually the coach or the GM or the stat guy quietly reduces it or phases it out. New Orleans gave up on it. Denver gave up on it. Detroit gave up on it. It never worked in Memphis.

    The two PGs with size (and some defense) together has worked in Cleveland. For awhile in Washington before Arenas got hurt and Daniels became a shadow. J-Williams -Wade won a title. Blake-Roy is sorta of that even if you don’t think of it way initially. Rose-Hinrich really ought to be milked heavy, far heavier than it has. Kidd-Terry,anybody and M Daniels in Indiana count too to me.

    If they go Rubio-Westbrook- and they get along- then a lob to the rim that Westbrook cuts or backcuts to go get should be an option off of almost any play.

Comment pages
  1. No trackbacks yet.