What exactly are we witnessing with this Durant guy?
I’ve encouraged fans to write in and be part of this blog and I got this awesome email about Kevin Durant the other day about how far he’s come and how far he could go. Really good stuff. Do yourself a favor and take 10 minutes and read it.
By John Mietus (john.mietus@gmail.com)
Not often in a lifetime does an unconventional male sporting hero come along. One whom can be defined as a true genius of his trade, a marvel of modern engineering and competitive spirit. Only a few names come to mind as I think of the sporting achievements of men in my lifetime: Gretzky, Federer, Tiger, Larry Bird, Earvin “Magic” Johnson, men whose mental genius outweighs even their physical capability.
Take Gretzky, the slowest skater, perennially on his championship Edmonton Oiler teams. Bird, the worst run/jump athlete to ever star in the NBA, Roger Federer whose thorough dissection courtesy of David Foster Wallace reads like a manual into the mind of the greatest unusual tennis champion of all time. What cannot be measured in athletics is the mind’s ability to process and react within a fraction of a second, finding the razor’s edge margin between victory and defeat, and allowing the finest of the champions to stand out not only for their physical prowess but also their mental acuity. I hesitate to even use the term “mental” as if this type of genius is something that can be taught or learned. It’s a gift. And so few have it that it remains infinitely recognizable, even in a sea of sports culture. Even within the confines of statistics and SportsCenter highlights, even within a world of critics and haters, it stands out.
I saw it in a young 17 year old Argentine making his European club football (soccer) debut with Barcelona a few years back. I remember watching Lionel Messi perform for less than five minutes and thinking, “By god, he’s going to be the best player in the world some day.” It’s an intrinsic ability to read sporting situations and react accordingly at the pinnacle of one’s judgment that set Messiover the top, as it had Bird, Tiger, and the aptly named Magic Johnson in the past. It’s in many ways a magical quality, difficult to even define.
Those that talk about professional sports don’t always understand the most fundamental aspect of the sports they discuss: The raw ability necessary to compete at the highest level is oneof the fundamental deciders as to who will move on and who will get passed over. It’s human nature to select the biggest, fastest, strongest warriors they can find in whatever their discipline happens to be. A man must fit certain natural ability requirements before he can even hope to make inroads into the professional sporting arena. And that’s where guys like Messi, etc. are such remarkable figures in sport. Their natural ability would barely make them passable players in a pickup game. There are certainly more impressive physical specimens out roaming the playing fields. My college basketball coach used to talk about guys who passed the “look test”, meaning that you took one look at them and figured they could play.
But interestingly enough, often the look test proves faulty, you really cannot judge a book by its cover, you never know who will make the best teammate or has the will to become a true champion. However, it is true that in most cases the athletes that excel are the ones predestined to the physical attributes necessary for their sport. If Larry Bird were 6’5″ tall he would not have been an NBA player. But at 6’9″ he was able to overcome his lack of run/jump ability and became one of the greatest players in the history of the game. Even at 6’9″ it took an inordinate amount of athletic genius to overcome a lack of physical ability.
Anyway long story short, the news media now is drooling all over itself to crown Lebron James the next maestro of the hardwood. He’s a physical freak, 6’9″ tall and weighing roughly 260 lbs. of sinewy muscle. He’s a force of nature in the open court, taking the ball hard to the basket in ways that perhaps only Dr. J or Darryl Dawkins in their prime could have matched. He’s a miniature Shaquille O’Neal, but with skills and court vision. He’s a monster to defend and nobody seems to be able to stop him. But he’s not a true genius of the game. He’s built exactly for what he’s been able to do. He’s taken his rightful place at the top of the league in terms of statistics, team success, and media appreciation. But he’s not going to ever be Larry Bird. He doesn’t have it. And in the next year or so he’s going to be slowly overtaken by a young man who does have it. That man’s name is Kevin Durant and he toils in obscurity, playing for a miserable team in Oklahoma City, a city that didn’t have a professional basketball team mere months ago.
Durant’s particulars are that he’s 6’9 or 6’10″ tall, tall enough to be considered for the NBA, but he comes with a wispy frame more suited for a Masai warrior than a professional athlete. His arms are spaghetti strands that drape down past his bony kneecaps. His narrow shoulders slope down into a tiny waist. His oversized feet hang off him like Christmas stockings, in size 18 shoes. He’s nothing spectacular to look at from a physical perspective, and he’s not going to be able to change his body type. What Durant has is a certain je ne sais quois to his game that nobody else in the league has. He’s barely 20 years old, with the body of a 15-year old, and yet he’s absolutely destroying people on a nightly basis in the most competitive basketball league in the world.
At 20 years old, in his second year in the league Durant averages 25 pts. 7 rebounds and 3 assists per game. Those numbers would be higher if Durant had not been played out of position by his less than intelligent first coach P.J. Carlesimo. Carlesimo chose to put Durant out of position at shooting guard where he would be kept on the perimeter and not close to the basket for most offensive and defensive possessions. Carlesimo’s firing brought in new coach Scott Brooks who promptly moved Durant to his natural small forward slot and reaped immediate statistical benefits. In the last two months Durant is up to around 28 pts, 9 rebounds, and 3.5 assists. Those stats compare favorably to Lebron’s 27, 7 and 7 in his second year in the league.
However, these numbers tell only a small fraction of the story of Durant. As opposed to the wrecking ball power of Lebron, Durant is a wiry assassin, picking his spots judiciously and much more adept at scoring the ball in a half-court offense than Lebron. Durant has continuously come up with clutch baskets during his two year career, hitting multiple game winners even as a rookie, and can be relied upon in the clutch to both take and make the big shot. Lebron does not have that same natural ability to shoot/score the basketball and in clutch situations often must pass to teammates for the last shot. That is not really a knock on Lebron, he’s making the right decisions time and time again, opting to pass out of double teams and share the ball for higher percentage shots, but it does show how Durant can pass Lebron as a player in the coming years: By being more like Michael Jordan than Lebron. Lebron doesn’t have the killer instinct of Durant, and it cannot be developed.
The description of Durant on FreeDarko.com, one of the premier basketball blogs on the web, further expounds upon Durant’s special characteristics:
“There is perhaps no greater evidence of (professionalism) than the rise of Kevin Durant. Durant’s mild-mannered off the court, but on it has a phantasmic bloodlust that’s equal parts sneaky, vicious, and just plain mysterious.”
“Durant goes to the rim stronger, faster and more insistent than we’d thought possible, while retaining all the sleek, slippery qualities that define his movements on the court. He rebounds, sometimes with a force bordering on outrage, and sets up teammates with tough passes. And on defense, there’s determination if not always results, and feats that use his length to its fullest.”
Durant is quite simply, special. He’s already passed up the vast majority of NBA players in value to a team at the tender age of 20 years old. According to HoopsDaily.com, Durant ranks sixth in overall value to a franchise behind 1. Lebron, 2. Chris Paul, 3. Dwight Howard, 4. Dwyane Wade and 5. Kobe Bryant. He’s younger than all of these players by a minimum of three years. The beginning of his prime is seven years away as he adds strength to his frame and experience in game situations. There is no ceiling that can fully capture the potential of Kevin Durant at this point. Had the Portland Trailblazers selected him No. 1 in the 2007 NBA draft instead of Greg Oden, they would currently be a championship contender with a ten year window for winning multiple trophies.
Enjoy Durant this year and prepare to see a whole lot of him in the future.

“That man’s name is Kevin Durant and he toils in obscurity, playing for a miserable team in Oklahoma City, a city that stole their professional basketball team from Seattle mere months ago.”
Jerk.
Holding back the urge to send him an expletive-filled email with all my might.
I really considered editing it, but he wrote it so he has to stand by it.
I feel you though Daniel.
EDIT: Oh what the hey, I don’t like it, so I’m changing it.
That’s a shame… what a well written piece, just to through in the whole miserable and stole parts were low and not needed. On the other hand, I agree with his evaluation of KD and the potential for greatness that exists there… How incredibly lucky are we to have his career to look forward to?…
I think we’re looking at the leagues next big scoring Superstar.
First time poster here. I have been enjoying this blog a lot. Sorry to thread jack, but I saw on espn that Amare Stoudemire is up for trade atm. One of the trade possibilties is Jeff Green, Joe Smith and Desmond Mason for Amare. I think the Suns will want a bit more than Jeff Green and expiring contracts. One thing we have on the suns is their unprotected 2010 draft pick, which if they trade Amare & Shaq will should be a very high pick. What do you guys think about this trade? Amare, KD and Russel Westbrook would be a sick threesome which could match up well with anyone in the league. Plus I think going from an aging team where he is the young pup around the old men to one where he is in a leadership role would be good for Amare. Throw in our high draft pick next year where we would’nt have to hope we get Blake Griffin (who will never be as good as Amare imo) and we would have a good core which could compete in 1 or 2 years. The article mentions Amare not wanting to sign here, but we can pay him the most money and 2010 is a packed Free Agency and not that many teams will want to pay the max.
http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/columns/story?columnist=ford_chad&page=amaredealscenario-090207
I’d rather keep Green… I’m not sold on Stoudemire fitting what we want to accomplish here… Keep the “holy trinity” together… Durant, Green, Westbrook need to grow together… and will win together.
Again, not to hijack the thread and post here, but I agree with AD. Stoudamire is truly a talent, but he already has a lot of mileage on those surgically repaired knees, and he already has a team wanting to “unload” him, which really says a lot about him.
From all reports, the clubhouse is healthy and the players love each other. Why mess with the “young upstart” theme here? We aren’t making the playoffs this year, so I say stick to the plan.
This article is amazing. I never thought that way about Durant and Lebron. But i think that Lebron does have the mental tools to be the next MJ, and he will be. While Durant will be great, i don’t think he will ever be Lebron.
Royce it is pretty easy to figure what word you edited. Now folks can debate if you should have, but since you did, you might want to note the edit at spot of the original text to make clear that the author words have been changed. I would think that would be appropriate from a journalistic standpoint but depending on what standards you want to apply I guess maybe in a blog it could be looser.
LB, I think 1 problem is whether or not the Thunder could lock Stoudemire up long term. Is he a better player than Jeff? Certainly. But I wouldn’t give up Jeff just to have Amare for a year.
Stoudemire wants to be the FP, will not work with Kevin Durant in the roster.
I also don’t think he would stay after 2010 with so many teams under the cap…
It would be a big mistake, Stoudemire is a great player, but Green is just coming into his own, and is showing signs of being a real asset, and Westbrook is only a season away from breaking out himself. Keep the three together, in another year every team in the NBA will wish they had just one of them.
As to the article, I have to agree, KD shows signs of surpassing LeBron. He has that basketball vision, LeBron is a great player, but he relies on brute force.
It was a great article about KD. One thing I don’t think I’ve seen written about KD (Although I don’t read that much basketball stuff) is how fast he can zig zag to the basket. He seems like he does it about once a game, like greased lightning and wow we have 2 points. I wish he would do that more! No doubt he is one of the best players not talked about – geez he deserved to be an all star.
And please, please, please don’t trade anyone! The team is finally working together with great results.
To those first couple of posts complaining about the writer mentioning that the Thunder were stolen from Seattle. While it is a thing of the past, and the point of the article is clearly about kevin durant (one of my favorite players) i don’t really see how even OKC fans can find fault with his bitter statement. he uses the word “stole”, im not quite sure what else i would call a man, buying a team and signing a contract that involves a “good intention to stay” clause. Then holding the city for ransom buy demanding they pay for stadium (something not even a plurality of other franchises in the NBA a granted) and then moving them to his hometown seemingly on a whim. I say “on a whim” because, while im sure OKC is a great city and i have heard nothing but good things about it, it is has less people and a much smaller TV market than Seattle…so the move was not monetarily motivated. Point being, if the dude wants to call a theft a theft, why not let him? after all, you guys wound up with the team.