<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Open mouth, insert foot.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dailythunder.com/2009/02/640/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dailythunder.com/2009/02/640/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 05:42:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Travis</title>
		<link>http://www.dailythunder.com/2009/02/640/comment-page-1/#comment-1843</link>
		<dc:creator>Travis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 22:40:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailythunder.com/?p=640#comment-1843</guid>
		<description>Kevin Durant is also the only player remotely near an All Star on his team. That can be argued either way, but Melo went through a fairly major system overhaul, and has changed from being a shoot first, score first offensive option next to AI, to a well rounded rebounder, passer, and scorer with Chauncey. Most teams take time to gel when a change like that happens, but they Nuggets have the third best record in the West right now, and I&#039;d attribute that to Melo&#039;s willingness to change his game, and make his team better. Also, I don&#039;t feel the best player on any team as bad as the Thunder deserves to be an All Star. That&#039;s what ruins baseball&#039;s All Star game. I&#039;m sure Durant will get to be an all star plenty of times when he opts out of Oklahoma after next season. Melo didn&#039;t make it in his first two years even though he had high offensive output. Sometimes you&#039;ve got to pay your dues.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kevin Durant is also the only player remotely near an All Star on his team. That can be argued either way, but Melo went through a fairly major system overhaul, and has changed from being a shoot first, score first offensive option next to AI, to a well rounded rebounder, passer, and scorer with Chauncey. Most teams take time to gel when a change like that happens, but they Nuggets have the third best record in the West right now, and I&#8217;d attribute that to Melo&#8217;s willingness to change his game, and make his team better. Also, I don&#8217;t feel the best player on any team as bad as the Thunder deserves to be an All Star. That&#8217;s what ruins baseball&#8217;s All Star game. I&#8217;m sure Durant will get to be an all star plenty of times when he opts out of Oklahoma after next season. Melo didn&#8217;t make it in his first two years even though he had high offensive output. Sometimes you&#8217;ve got to pay your dues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith</title>
		<link>http://www.dailythunder.com/2009/02/640/comment-page-1/#comment-1834</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 19:17:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailythunder.com/?p=640#comment-1834</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-1821&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@Mat&lt;/a&gt; 

I understand what you are saying, but my main point was that you can&#039;t compare last year&#039;s Melo to this year&#039;s Durant. If you can, then I should be able to compare this year&#039;s Durant to 20 year old Melo. I think Melo is one of the greatest talents in the league, but he is also having an off year. His efficiency, rebounds, and FTs are all down, and I really don&#039;t feel he&#039;s been the centerpiece of the team like an All Star should be, of course for this year only.

I don&#039;t think he&#039;s an All Star caliber player this year simply because he&#039;s not the force he was in past years (due in large part to the injury, but that&#039;s the point, he&#039;s not playing like an All Star). I think Durant is the better player this year because he is the absolute focus of every team he plays, and still sports All Star numbers and play. Next year will be a better comparison. Durant should start moving into the realm of where he will stay for the next few years, and hopefully Melo can be healthy and playing like his old self. Until then, I have to give this year to Durant, and overall career to Melo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-1821" rel="nofollow">@Mat</a> </p>
<p>I understand what you are saying, but my main point was that you can&#8217;t compare last year&#8217;s Melo to this year&#8217;s Durant. If you can, then I should be able to compare this year&#8217;s Durant to 20 year old Melo. I think Melo is one of the greatest talents in the league, but he is also having an off year. His efficiency, rebounds, and FTs are all down, and I really don&#8217;t feel he&#8217;s been the centerpiece of the team like an All Star should be, of course for this year only.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think he&#8217;s an All Star caliber player this year simply because he&#8217;s not the force he was in past years (due in large part to the injury, but that&#8217;s the point, he&#8217;s not playing like an All Star). I think Durant is the better player this year because he is the absolute focus of every team he plays, and still sports All Star numbers and play. Next year will be a better comparison. Durant should start moving into the realm of where he will stay for the next few years, and hopefully Melo can be healthy and playing like his old self. Until then, I have to give this year to Durant, and overall career to Melo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.dailythunder.com/2009/02/640/comment-page-1/#comment-1831</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 19:08:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailythunder.com/?p=640#comment-1831</guid>
		<description>Look, this article...while I appreciate the reasons for defending Durant...is very one sided.  I don&#039;t want to call it homerish...but it is borderline.

No one can deny that Durant is All-Star calibre player.  No one can also deny that Melo IS an All-Star, and will be selected to many many more before his career is over.  Everyone knows the reason Melo wasn&#039;t selected this year was because he was injured for 15 games...that is a big chunk to miss and still be selected by the coaches.

As for head to head comparisons, Durant is a better shooter, Melo a better well rounded scorer.  Melo can score from the 3 point line or driving or posting up, and has probably the best mid-range game in the League.  He quite simply was the most dominant player in the world in the FIBA championships.  It is not like he got old or worse or something...he has been injured!!!  As has already been brought out, he shot right around 50% last year and this year he is at 44%, albeit with a much smaller sample size than Durant due to the injuries.  And as a fan of the league, I can tell you when I watched Melo play earlier this year he was hurting after every shot.  You have to take a larger sample size than the first part of this year to legitimately compare the two players.  

Yes, your discussion was based on the fact that Melo said he was the best SF in the West.  That was a haughty statement, but since when have NBA atheletes but humble creatures???  Sure, some maybe are, but you cannot be shocked by that statement.  He is confident in his abilities and sometimes these comments come across as narcissistic when they are nothing more than a player believing in his skills.  Melo does tend to say some stupid stuff sometimes, but I think it makes him more real.  When have any of us been perfect in our statements about ourselves.  We all tend to want to believe we are the man...so really, I think this article has more to do with you disliking Melo than truly comparing the two players.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Look, this article&#8230;while I appreciate the reasons for defending Durant&#8230;is very one sided.  I don&#8217;t want to call it homerish&#8230;but it is borderline.</p>
<p>No one can deny that Durant is All-Star calibre player.  No one can also deny that Melo IS an All-Star, and will be selected to many many more before his career is over.  Everyone knows the reason Melo wasn&#8217;t selected this year was because he was injured for 15 games&#8230;that is a big chunk to miss and still be selected by the coaches.</p>
<p>As for head to head comparisons, Durant is a better shooter, Melo a better well rounded scorer.  Melo can score from the 3 point line or driving or posting up, and has probably the best mid-range game in the League.  He quite simply was the most dominant player in the world in the FIBA championships.  It is not like he got old or worse or something&#8230;he has been injured!!!  As has already been brought out, he shot right around 50% last year and this year he is at 44%, albeit with a much smaller sample size than Durant due to the injuries.  And as a fan of the league, I can tell you when I watched Melo play earlier this year he was hurting after every shot.  You have to take a larger sample size than the first part of this year to legitimately compare the two players.  </p>
<p>Yes, your discussion was based on the fact that Melo said he was the best SF in the West.  That was a haughty statement, but since when have NBA atheletes but humble creatures???  Sure, some maybe are, but you cannot be shocked by that statement.  He is confident in his abilities and sometimes these comments come across as narcissistic when they are nothing more than a player believing in his skills.  Melo does tend to say some stupid stuff sometimes, but I think it makes him more real.  When have any of us been perfect in our statements about ourselves.  We all tend to want to believe we are the man&#8230;so really, I think this article has more to do with you disliking Melo than truly comparing the two players.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mat</title>
		<link>http://www.dailythunder.com/2009/02/640/comment-page-1/#comment-1826</link>
		<dc:creator>Mat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 17:46:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailythunder.com/?p=640#comment-1826</guid>
		<description>&quot;two PFs selected to START in the West&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;two PFs selected to START in the West&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mat</title>
		<link>http://www.dailythunder.com/2009/02/640/comment-page-1/#comment-1825</link>
		<dc:creator>Mat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 17:45:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailythunder.com/?p=640#comment-1825</guid>
		<description>Let me start out by saying that I think it was a stupid thing to say and I don&#039;t agree with the claim that there are no other great SFs in the west. Durant is very worthy of being an All-Star, as are about 4-5 players in the West that didn&#039;t make it. Carmelo is absolutely close to being All Star caliber this year, and his numbers bear that out. 21.5 ppg 7 rpg 3.8 apg playing on a team that is 3rd in the west at 34-17 is absolutely worthy of all star consideration. You may wish to argue that other players (Durant, Al Jefferson) are more worthy, but that doesn&#039;t mean that Melo isn&#039;t worth consideration as well.

The reason the FG% is flawed is that this is why Durant&#039;s shooting NUMBERS are better but it does not mean that Durant is the better player in general. Were Durant selected to be an all star this year in light of that FG difference, I would have no problem with it whatsoever. But just because he is presently shooting a better percentage, does not make him a better overall player than a healthy Carmelo Anthony.

Last year, Carmelo shot 49% from the field, this year he is shooting 44% percent from the field. I think it&#039;s a fair statement that this is in large part due to his elbow injury. Since returning from his broken hand and having a chance to rest his elbow, he&#039;s shooting 50% from the field and his team has gone 4-1. While Durant may be having the better statistical season, at the end of the year, the Nuggets are going to have about 55 wins while OKC will be in the lottery. Carmelo&#039;s stats will look about the same as Durants, except with higher rpg and apg. I&#039;m not sure who will be the better player in the future, Durant has a very bright future ahead of him but Melo is just 24 himself and far from a finished product himself. Based off the two DEN-OKC games this year, I can&#039;t wait to see them match up in the future. 

The real problem with the All Star selections, is that there are almost always two PFs selected in the West and no SFs because the PFs are always going to have better rebounding and block numbers compared to the SFs. Personally, both players should be in PHX in a few weeks, they are easily the 2 best SFs in the West.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let me start out by saying that I think it was a stupid thing to say and I don&#8217;t agree with the claim that there are no other great SFs in the west. Durant is very worthy of being an All-Star, as are about 4-5 players in the West that didn&#8217;t make it. Carmelo is absolutely close to being All Star caliber this year, and his numbers bear that out. 21.5 ppg 7 rpg 3.8 apg playing on a team that is 3rd in the west at 34-17 is absolutely worthy of all star consideration. You may wish to argue that other players (Durant, Al Jefferson) are more worthy, but that doesn&#8217;t mean that Melo isn&#8217;t worth consideration as well.</p>
<p>The reason the FG% is flawed is that this is why Durant&#8217;s shooting NUMBERS are better but it does not mean that Durant is the better player in general. Were Durant selected to be an all star this year in light of that FG difference, I would have no problem with it whatsoever. But just because he is presently shooting a better percentage, does not make him a better overall player than a healthy Carmelo Anthony.</p>
<p>Last year, Carmelo shot 49% from the field, this year he is shooting 44% percent from the field. I think it&#8217;s a fair statement that this is in large part due to his elbow injury. Since returning from his broken hand and having a chance to rest his elbow, he&#8217;s shooting 50% from the field and his team has gone 4-1. While Durant may be having the better statistical season, at the end of the year, the Nuggets are going to have about 55 wins while OKC will be in the lottery. Carmelo&#8217;s stats will look about the same as Durants, except with higher rpg and apg. I&#8217;m not sure who will be the better player in the future, Durant has a very bright future ahead of him but Melo is just 24 himself and far from a finished product himself. Based off the two DEN-OKC games this year, I can&#8217;t wait to see them match up in the future. </p>
<p>The real problem with the All Star selections, is that there are almost always two PFs selected in the West and no SFs because the PFs are always going to have better rebounding and block numbers compared to the SFs. Personally, both players should be in PHX in a few weeks, they are easily the 2 best SFs in the West.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith</title>
		<link>http://www.dailythunder.com/2009/02/640/comment-page-1/#comment-1824</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 17:22:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailythunder.com/?p=640#comment-1824</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-1821&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@Mat&lt;/a&gt; 

Why does Melo being hurt make the numbers flawed? Correct me if I&#039;m wrong, but injury lessens your ability to plays. That is to say, if one player is injured, he probably isn&#039;t as good as a relatively equal player who is healthy.

The whole premise of this article was started by Melo claiming himself the best and only SF in the West worth consideration. That claim is ridiculous. Melo isn&#039;t even close to being All Star caliber this year. Just because someone was great in the past doesn&#039;t mean they are great NOW.

If you are going to use Melo&#039;s potential (from past seasons) to declare him the better player, you would be remiss not to use Durant&#039;s potential as well (comparisons at age). And if you do that, Durant looks like he&#039;ll be the far better player in the future, while also being the better player THIS YEAR.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-1821" rel="nofollow">@Mat</a> </p>
<p>Why does Melo being hurt make the numbers flawed? Correct me if I&#8217;m wrong, but injury lessens your ability to plays. That is to say, if one player is injured, he probably isn&#8217;t as good as a relatively equal player who is healthy.</p>
<p>The whole premise of this article was started by Melo claiming himself the best and only SF in the West worth consideration. That claim is ridiculous. Melo isn&#8217;t even close to being All Star caliber this year. Just because someone was great in the past doesn&#8217;t mean they are great NOW.</p>
<p>If you are going to use Melo&#8217;s potential (from past seasons) to declare him the better player, you would be remiss not to use Durant&#8217;s potential as well (comparisons at age). And if you do that, Durant looks like he&#8217;ll be the far better player in the future, while also being the better player THIS YEAR.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mat</title>
		<link>http://www.dailythunder.com/2009/02/640/comment-page-1/#comment-1821</link>
		<dc:creator>Mat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 16:49:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailythunder.com/?p=640#comment-1821</guid>
		<description>Why does this article and nobody in these postings seem to acknowledge that the shooting numbers presented are entirely flawed? Carmelo has had an elbow injury on his shooting arm the entire season that he has been struggling with and even missed several games with. Isn&#039;t this quite relevant to the article and why Durant is shooting better? How does this not get brought up?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why does this article and nobody in these postings seem to acknowledge that the shooting numbers presented are entirely flawed? Carmelo has had an elbow injury on his shooting arm the entire season that he has been struggling with and even missed several games with. Isn&#8217;t this quite relevant to the article and why Durant is shooting better? How does this not get brought up?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith</title>
		<link>http://www.dailythunder.com/2009/02/640/comment-page-1/#comment-1818</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 16:11:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailythunder.com/?p=640#comment-1818</guid>
		<description>I was very disappointed in Durant seemingly not even considered for the All Star game, and no one mentioning it. The biggest problem is that coaches and voters in the NBA don&#039;t decide things based on merit, they decide based on record. Lebron James has been the best basketball player in the world for the past 3 or so seasons, but has never been an MVP due to to his playing with mostly sub-par players.

The idea that Melo&#039;s past success and playoff caliber teammates make him a better player than Durant is preposterous. By that logic, Allen Iverson is a better player than Devin Harris and Vince Carter this year. Sure, Harris and Carter are more efficient scorers, defenders, and all around players, but AI has had considerably more success in his career, and the Pistons have a better record than the Nets.

I very much respect Carmelo and what he&#039;s brought to Denver, but let&#039;s not pretend he has been having a good year. Denver&#039;s success is due mostly to Nene and Billups, so record really shouldn&#039;t be as much of a factor when comparing Melo to anyone.

By the way, I really enjoy the blog. It&#039;s nice to hear someone actually extrapolate once in a while, and not just regurgitate ESPN announcers force feeding us their outdated opinions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was very disappointed in Durant seemingly not even considered for the All Star game, and no one mentioning it. The biggest problem is that coaches and voters in the NBA don&#8217;t decide things based on merit, they decide based on record. Lebron James has been the best basketball player in the world for the past 3 or so seasons, but has never been an MVP due to to his playing with mostly sub-par players.</p>
<p>The idea that Melo&#8217;s past success and playoff caliber teammates make him a better player than Durant is preposterous. By that logic, Allen Iverson is a better player than Devin Harris and Vince Carter this year. Sure, Harris and Carter are more efficient scorers, defenders, and all around players, but AI has had considerably more success in his career, and the Pistons have a better record than the Nets.</p>
<p>I very much respect Carmelo and what he&#8217;s brought to Denver, but let&#8217;s not pretend he has been having a good year. Denver&#8217;s success is due mostly to Nene and Billups, so record really shouldn&#8217;t be as much of a factor when comparing Melo to anyone.</p>
<p>By the way, I really enjoy the blog. It&#8217;s nice to hear someone actually extrapolate once in a while, and not just regurgitate ESPN announcers force feeding us their outdated opinions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.dailythunder.com/2009/02/640/comment-page-1/#comment-1810</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 13:04:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailythunder.com/?p=640#comment-1810</guid>
		<description>:O)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>:O)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.dailythunder.com/2009/02/640/comment-page-1/#comment-1806</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 06:13:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailythunder.com/?p=640#comment-1806</guid>
		<description>On the issue of there being no-one else, clearly Durant should be in the conversation, and to not mention him is a gross oversight. Still, most of the other points are moot: Durant and Anthony have a lot of similarities, and what one does better (e.g. Durant on D, passing for Anthony), the edges are not big enough to uncategorically put one about the other. Even arguing that Anthony has played on better, but still average-at-best teams could be considered unfair when Durant has never even had a chance at decent teammates most of the time. 

So agreed with your point: Durant deserves more respect. Probably wouldn&#039;t have argued it as forcefully, but what&#039;s a blog for :)?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the issue of there being no-one else, clearly Durant should be in the conversation, and to not mention him is a gross oversight. Still, most of the other points are moot: Durant and Anthony have a lot of similarities, and what one does better (e.g. Durant on D, passing for Anthony), the edges are not big enough to uncategorically put one about the other. Even arguing that Anthony has played on better, but still average-at-best teams could be considered unfair when Durant has never even had a chance at decent teammates most of the time. </p>
<p>So agreed with your point: Durant deserves more respect. Probably wouldn&#8217;t have argued it as forcefully, but what&#8217;s a blog for :)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  www.dailythunder.com/2009/02/640/feed/ ) in 0.30865 seconds, on Feb 9th, 2012 at 5:43 am UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 9th, 2012 at 6:43 am UTC -->
